Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing market efficiency on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange using the overlapping serial test

Annals of Operations Research volume 243, pages 273–300 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

It has been suggested that stock exchanges may be tested for market efficiency by using tests for assessing random number generators. This paper uses such a test to assess the efficiency of small, mid and large cap indices on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, while making adjustments for thin trading which occurs during the sample period. The efficiency of these indices is examined using individual share level data as well as index level data over a stable period and a period containing the 2008 financial crisis. This study finds evidence suggesting that small cap stocks exhibit a high degree of non-randomness in price movements. Some inefficiencies also appear to be present in mid and large cap stocks, however to a much lesser extent, with large cap stocks exhibiting higher levels of efficiency. Many of the stocks investigated appear to exhibit lower levels of efficiency during the crisis period. This may be a result of increased irrationality during periods of uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. See Roux and Gilbertson (1978) for more.

  2. The total number of shares analysed by Kruger et al. (2012) was 109. We analysed 111 shares in this paper. It is not apparently obvious if the set of shares studied by Kruger, Toerien and MacDonald is a proper subset of the set of shares studied in this paper.

  3. The number of shares removed from the sample are as follows: 32 Small, 17 Mid, and 6 Large Cap shares.

  4. The psi-square statistic could not be calculated for a small cap share despite our relaxation of Marsaglia’s (2005) assumption (see ticker YRK in Table 8 in the “Appendix”).

References

  • Affleck-Graves, J. P., & Money, A. H. (1975). A note on the random walk model and South African share prices. South African Journal of Economics, 43(3), 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, M. D., Butler, K. C., & Simonds, R. R. (1987). Nonsynchronus security trading and market index autocorrelation. Journal of Finance, 42(1), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. (2010). Essentials of investments (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonga-Bonga, L. (2012). The evolving efficiency of the South African stock exchange. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(9), 997–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., & Chen, C. (2013). Patterns in stock market movements tested as random number generators. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1965a). Random walks in stock market prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 21(5), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1965b). The behaviour of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. (1953). The serial test for sampling numbers and other tests for randomness. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 49(2), 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J., & Gover, T. N. (1967). The generalized serial test and the binary expansion of \(\surd \)2. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 130(1), 102–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadassin, I. (1976). An investigation into the behaviour of earnings and share prices of South African listed companies. Investment Analysts Journal, 8(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferis, K., & Smith, G. (2004). Capitalisation and weak-form efficiency in the JSE securities exchange. South African Journal of Economics, 72(4), 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferis, K., & Smith, G. (2005). The changing efficiency of African stock markets. South African Journal of Economics, 73(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesburg Stock Exchange. (2013). Index reviews—Committee papers: Quarterly review, JSE. http://www.jse.co.za/Products/FTSE-JSE/Indexreviews.aspx

  • Kemp, A. G., & Reid, G. C. (1971). The random walk hypothesis and the recent behaviour of equity prices in Britain. Economica, 38(149), 28–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlbrenner, P. W. (2003). The design and analysis of a true random number generator in a field programmable gate array. Masters Thesis. George Mason University.

  • Kruger, R., Toerien, F., & MacDonald, I. (2012). Nonlinear serial dependence in share returns on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The African Finance Journal, 14(2), 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K.-P. (2007). Ranking market efficiency for stock markets: A nonlinear perspective. Physica A, 376(1), 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangani, R. (2007). Distributional properties of JSE prices and returns. Investment Analysts Journal, 66(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsaglia, G. (1985). A current view of random number generators. In Computer science and statistics: Proceedings of the 16th symposium on the interface, March 1984 (pp. 151–158). Atlanta: Elsevier.

  • Marsaglia, G. (2005). Monkeying with the goodness-of-fit test. Journal of Statistical Software, 14(13), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlambo, C., Biekpe, N., & Smit, E. vd M. (2003). Testing the random walk hypothesis on thinly-traded markets: The case of four African stock markets. The African Finance Journal, 5(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Q., Van Vuuren, G., & Styger, P. (2009). Further evidence of long memory in the South African stock market. South African Journal of Economics, 77(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M. (1994). Introduction to the special issue on finance. Interfaces, 24(3), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, F. J. P., & Gilberston, B. P. (1976). The behaviour of shares prices on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. (Report; no. F76/67). South Africa: Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co., Ltd.

  • Roux, F. J. P., & Gilbertson, B. P. (1978). The behaviour of share prices on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Jefferis, K., & Ryoo, H.-J. (2002). African stock markets: Multiple variance ratio tests of random walks. Applied Financial Economics, 12(7), 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebel, P. J. (1977). The limited efficiency of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The Investment Analysts Journal, 10(1), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Tsang, W. (2007). An empirical study on the power of the overlapping serial test. In Proceedings of the Asia simulation conference 2007 (pp. 375–383), Seoul.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Finance and Tax, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa

    Michael A. Noakes & Kanshukan Rajaratnam

  2. African Collaboration for Quantitative Finance and Risk Research (ACQuFRR), University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa

    Kanshukan Rajaratnam

Authors
  1. Michael A. Noakes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kanshukan Rajaratnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanshukan Rajaratnam.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

Table 5 Summary of tests of market efficiency on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
Full size table
Table 6 Univariate statistics of small cap shares
Full size table
Table 7 Univariate statistics of mid cap shares
Full size table
Table 8 Univariate statistics of large cap shares
Full size table
Table 9 Results for small cap shares over the stable and unstable periods
Full size table
Table 10 Results for mid cap shares over the stable and unstable periods
Full size table
Table 11 Results for large cap shares over the stable and unstable periods
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noakes, M.A., Rajaratnam, K. Testing market efficiency on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange using the overlapping serial test. Ann Oper Res 243, 273–300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1751-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1751-y

Keywords

search

Navigation