Skip to main content

The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time

Annals of Operations Research volume 226, pages 1–27 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper deals with a special case of the non-homogeneity problem related to the determination of the global benchmark technology when measuring productivity changes over time. The authors propose a new way of constructing the global framework of the Malmquist index which applies the minimum extrapolation principle on the aggregation of the experienced contemporaneous technologies. The proposed index, called overall Malmquist index, preserves the role of each contemporaneous technology in the determination of the newly-proposed best practice technology, whereby an acceptable level of discrimination between non-homogeneous observations is provided. With respect to both computational and test properties, the proposed index possesses the circularity property, generates a single measure of productivity change and is immune to infeasibility under variable returns to scale. Furthermore, unlike in the global form, previously computed results by the overall Malmquist index are more stable and less sensitive to changes in the shape of the best practice technology when a new time period is incorporated. Similar to traditional indices, it can be decomposed into various components such as efficiency change, scale efficiency change, and best practice change. The suggested index will be illustrated by means of a real-world example from banking. In particular, it will be compared to the contemporaneous and global forms of the Malmquist index introduced into the literature by Färe et al. (J Product Anal 3:85–101, 1992) and Pastor and Lovell (Econ Lett 88:266–271, 2005) , respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Aghdam, R. F. (2011). Dynamics of productivity change in the Australian electricity industry: Assessing the impacts of electricity reform. Energy Policy, 39, 3281–3295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrell, P. J., & Tind, J. (2001). A dual approach to nonconvex frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alirezaee, M. R., & Afsharian, M. (2010). Improving discrimination of DEA models in multiple time periods evaluation. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17, 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althin, R. (2001). Measurement of productivity changes: Two Malmquist index approaches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Zofio, J. L. (2013). On the inconsistency of the Malmquist–Luenberger index. European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 738–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., Aggarwall, V., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balk, B. M., & Althin, R. (1996). A new, transitive productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 31, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., Rao, D. S. P., & Donnell, C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. A., Førsund, F. R., & Jansen, E. S. (1992). Malmquist indexes of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking 1980–1989. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho, A. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Dievert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index number and the measurement of input output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98, 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., & Färe, R. (1994). Hicks’ neutrality and trade biased growth: A taxonomy. Journal of Economic Theory, 64, 554–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., & Golany, B. (1985). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces. Annals of Operations Research, 2, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of the decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Yang, H. (2011). A cross-country comparison of productivity growth using the generalised metafrontier Malmquist productivity index: With application to banking industries in Taiwan and China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2003). A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 83, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye, L., Kuosmanen, T., & Post, G. T. (2001). FDH directional distance functions with an application to European commercial banks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, H., Wodchis, W., & Laporte, A. (2011). Efficiency and technological change in health care services in Ontario: An application of Malmquist productivity index with bootstrapping. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 721–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corton, M. L., & Berg, S. V. (2009). Benchmarking central American water utilities. Utilities Policy, 17, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. M. (1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1992). Productivity developments in Swedish pharmacies: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84, 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fethi, M. D., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, S. S. (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. A., & Wilson, P. (1998). Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitto, S., & Mancuso, P. (2012). Bootstrapping the Malmquist indexes for Italian airports. International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1999). A generalized Malmquist productivity index. TOP, 7, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1998). A quasi-Malmquist productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. (2003). Some remarks on productivity and its decompositions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. (1969). Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 564–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., & Ruttan, V. W. (1970). Agricultural productivity differences among countries. The American Economic Review, 60, 895–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisali, E., & Yawe, B. (2011). Total factor productivity growth in Uganda’s telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2010). Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega, 38, 484–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Cassoma, B., Asbu, E. Z., & Barry, S. (2008). A performance assessment method for hospitals: The case of municipal hospitals in Angola. Journal of Medical Systems, 32, 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P., & Shiu, A. (2010). Economic growth telecommunications development and productivity growth of the telecommunications sector: Evidence around the world. Telecommunications Policy, 34, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K. (2003). The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifferent surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M., & Page, J. M. (1982). Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1967–1978. The Economic Journal, 92, 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, D. H. (2010). A global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, D. H., & Lee, J. (2010). A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empirical Economics, 38, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradi, J. C., & Zhu, H. (2013). A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega, 41, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Asmild, M., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2011). The biennial Malmquist productivity change index. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45, 210–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88, 266–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2007). Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index. Economic Theory, 33, 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires, H. M., & Fernandes, E. (2012). Malmquist financial efficiency analysis for airlines. Transportation Research Part E, 48, 1049–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski, V. V. (2004). Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1311–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski, V. V. (2005). Selective convexity in DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 552–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M. C. A. S., & Thanassoulis, E. (2008). A circular Malmquist-type index for measuring productivity. Working Paper RP08-02. Aston University Birmingham B47ET, UK.

  • Portela, M. C. A. S., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010). Malmquist-type indices in the presence of negative data: An application to bank branches. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 1472–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., Horncastle, A., & Maugg, T. (2011). Productivity change in the water industry in England and Wales: Application of the meta-Malmquist index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 2173–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C., & Desli, E. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87, 1033–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shestalova, V. (2003). Sequential Malmquist indices of productivity growth: An application to OECD industrial activities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Productivity growth in industrialized countries. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Texas, Austin TX 78712.

  • Tovar, B., Ramos-Real, F. J., & de Almeida, E. F. (2011). Firm size and productivity: Evidence from the electricity distribution industry in Brazil. Energy Policy, 39, 826–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H., & Malnero, A. (1994). Nonparametric approaches to the assessment of the relative efficiency of bank branches. CORE Discussion Paper 9447, Université Catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research & Econometrics, Belgium.

  • Wang, C., Lee, J., & Chang, Y. (2012). Measuring productivity in the biotechnology industry using the global Malmquist index. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 807–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. (1999). Technical progress, inefficiency and productivity change in U.S. banking 1984–1993. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31, 212–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. (2012). Theoretical and empirical studies of productivity growth in the agricultural economics: Cases of China and the United States. Physics Procedia, 24, 1475–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zofio, J. L. (2007). Malmquist productivity index decompositions: A unifying framework. Applied Economics, 39, 2371–2387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zofio, J. L., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1998). Yet another Malmquist productivity index decomposition. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

  • Zofio, J. L., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2001). Graph efficiency and productivity measures: An application to US agriculture. Applied Economics, 33, 1433–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Sciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Fallersleber-Tor-Wall 23, 38100,  Braunschweig, Germany

    Mohsen Afsharian & Heinz Ahn

Authors
  1. Mohsen Afsharian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heinz Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Afsharian.

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Table 4.

Table 4 Descriptive statistics of the inputs and outputs used in this study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afsharian, M., Ahn, H. The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time. Ann Oper Res 226, 1–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1668-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1668-5

Keywords

  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • Productivity measurement
  • Malmquist productivity index
  • Overall Malmquist index
  • Banking

JEL Classification

  • C44
  • C67
  • D24