Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advances in energy and environmental issues in China: theory, models, and applications

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we review the energy efficiency in China, and the following topics are discussed. (i) Some useful empirical analyses applied on the energy efficiency based on some expanded models, (ii) the relationship among environment, energy and economic growth, (iii) some important environmental efficiency evaluation indexes, and (iv) some latest researches on the emission system. Finally, some policy recommendations are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carbone, J., Helm, C., & Rutherford, T. (2009). The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(3), 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. (1997). Energy consumption and economic growth in Brazil, Mexico and Venezuela: a time series analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 4(11), 671–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., Chen, C., & Liu, H. (2000). Economic-statistical design of X charts for non-normal data by considering quality loss. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(8), 939–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, A., Buchner, B., & Carraro, C. (2007). Allocation in the European emissions trading scheme: rights, rents and fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., et al. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Resource document, Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. http://www.yale.edu/esi/.

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C., et al. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., & Wang, S. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34, 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Dong, S., Li, X., et al. (2011). Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy, 39(2), 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Meng, W., Li, X., et al. (2010). DEA models with undesirable outputs. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malueg, D., & Yates, A. (2009). Strategic behavior, private information, and decentralization in the European union emissions trading system. Environmental & Resource Economics, 43(3), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtadi, H. (1995). Public spending, political structure and growth: evidence for the Middle East and North Africa from an international perspective. Working papers 9506, Economic Research Forum.

  • Oh, W., & Lee, K. (2004). Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea. Energy Economics, 26(1), 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oueslati, W. (2002). Environmental policy in an endogenous growth model with human capital and endogenous labor supply. Economic Modelling, 19, 487–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1959). Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics, 1, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G., Bi, J., & Wang, J. (2010). Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6172–6179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woerdman, E. (2000). Organizing emissions trading: the barrier of domestic permit allocation. Energy Policy, 8, 613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuana, J. H., Kang, J. G., Zhao, C. H., & Hu, Z. G. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. Energy Economics, 30(6), 3077–3094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaim, O. (2004). Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecological Economics, 48, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha, D., Zhou, D., & Ding, N. (2009). The contribution degree of sub-sectors to structure effect and intensity effects on industry energy intensity. in China from 1993 to 2003. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by National Natural Science Funds of China for Innovative Research Groups (No. 70821001), National Natural Science Funds of China (Nos. 70901069, 71222106), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20133402110028) and Soft Science Research Fund of Shaanxi Province (No. 11020503021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J., Song, M. & Yang, L. Advances in energy and environmental issues in China: theory, models, and applications. Ann Oper Res 228, 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1528-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1528-3

Keywords

Navigation