Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 232, Issue 1, pp 151–177 | Cite as

Modeling and solving a logging camp location problem

  • Sanjay Dominik JenaEmail author
  • Jean-François Cordeau
  • Bernard Gendron


Harvesting plans for Canadian logging companies tend to cover wider territories than before. Long transportation distances for the workers involved in logging activities have thus become a significant issue. Often, cities or villages to accommodate the workers are far away. A common practice is thus to construct camps close to the logging regions, containing the complete infrastructure to host the workers. The problem studied in this paper consists in finding the optimal number, location and size of logging camps. We investigate the relevance and advantages of constructing additional camps, as well as expanding and relocating existing ones, since the harvest areas change over time. We model this problem as an extension of the Capacitated Facility Location Problem. Economies of scale are included on several levels of the cost structure. We also consider temporary closing of facility parts and particular capacity constraints that involve integer rounding on the left hand side. Results for real-world data and for a large set of randomly generated instances are presented.


Logging camps Capacitated facility location problem Mixed integer programming 



We would like to thank Mathieu Blouin and Jean Favreau from FPInnovations for their valuable support throughout this study and for providing the data used in the experiments. The authors are also grateful to MITACS, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and FPInnovations for their financial support.


  1. Albareda-Sambola, M., Fernandez, E., Hinojosa, Y., & Puerto, J. (2009). The multi-period incremental service facility location problem. Computers & Operations Research, 36(5), 1356–1375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballou, R. H. (1968). Dynamic warehouse location analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 5(3), 271–276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bredström, D., Jönsson, P., & Rönnqvist, M. (2010). Annual planning of harvesting resources in the forest industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(2), 155–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canel, C., Khumawala, B. M., Law, J., & Loh, A. (2001). An algorithm for the capacitated, multi-commodity multi-period facility location problem. Computers & Operations Research, 28(5), 411–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlsson, D., D’Amours, S., Martel, A., & Rönnqvist, M. (2009). Supply chain planning models in the pulp and paper industry. INFOR. Information Systems and Operational Research, 47(3), 167–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Correia, I., & Captivo, M. (2003). A Lagrangean heuristic for a modular capacitated location problem. Annals of Operations Research, 122, 141–161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Amours, S., Rönnqvist, M., & Weintraub, A. (2008). Using operational research for supply chain planning in the forest products industry. INFOR. Information Systems and Operational Research, 46(4), 265–281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dias, J. (2006). Capacitated dynamic location problems with opening, closure and reopening of facilities. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 17(4), 317–348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gendron, B., & Crainic, T. (1994). Relaxations for multicommodity capacitated network design problems (Technical report). Publication CRT-945, Centre de recherche sur les transports, Université de Montréal. Google Scholar
  10. Geoffrion, A. M., & Graves, G. W. (1974). Multicommodity distribution system design by benders decomposition. Management Science, 20(5), 822–844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gouveia, L., & Saldanha da Gama, F. (2006). On the capacitated concentrator location problem: a reformulation by discretization. Computers & Operations Research, 33(5), 1242–1258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamacher, H., & Nickel, S. (1998). Classification of location models. Location Science, 6(1–4), 229–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmberg, K. (1994). Solving the staircase cost facility location problem with decomposition and piecewise linearization. European Journal of Operational Research, 75(1), 41–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmberg, K., & Ling, J. (1997). A Lagrangean heuristic for the facility location problem with staircase costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(1), 63–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klose, A., & Drexl, A. (2005). Facility location models for distribution system design. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(1), 4–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, C. Y. (1991). An optimal algorithm for the multiproduct capacitated facility location problem with a choice of facility type. Computers & Operations Research, 18(2), 167–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melo, M., Nickel, S., & Saldanha da Gama, F. (2005). Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: a mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Computers & Operations Research, 33(1), 181–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Melo, M., Nickel, S., & Saldanha da Gama, F. (2009). Facility location and supply chain management—a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 401–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Owen, S. H., & Daskin, M. S. (1998). Strategic facility location: a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(3), 423–447. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paquet, M., Martel, A., & Desaulniers, G. (2004). Including technology selection decisions in manufacturing network design models. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 17(2), 117–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peeters, D., & Antunes, A. P. (2001). On solving complex multi-period location models using simulated annealing. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(1), 190–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Revelle, C., & Eiselt, H. (2005). Location analysis: a synthesis and survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(1), 1–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Revelle, C., Eiselt, H., & Daskin, M. S. (2008). A bibliography for some fundamental problem categories in discrete location science. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(3), 817–848. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rönnqvist, M. (2003). Optimization in forestry. Mathematical Programming, 284, 267–284. Google Scholar
  25. Shulman, A. (1991). An algorithm for solving dynamic capacitated plant location problems with discrete expansion sizes. Operations Research, 39(3), 423–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, H. K., Laporte, G., & Harper, P. R. (2009). Locational analysis: highlights of growth to maturity. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, S140–S148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sridharan, R. (1991). A Lagrangian heuristic for the capacitated plant location problem with side constraints. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42(7), 579–585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sridharan, R. (1995). The capacitated plant location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 87(2), 203–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Troncoso, J., & Garrido, R. (2005). Forestry production and logistics planning: an analysis using mixed-integer programming. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 625–633. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Warszawski, A. (1973). Multi-dimensional location problems. Operational Research Quarterly, 24(2), 165–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weintraub, A., & Romero, C. (2006). Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: a review and comparison. Interfaces, 36(5), 446–457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wesolowsky, G. O. (1973). Dynamic facility location. Management Science, 19(11), 1241–1248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wesolowsky, G. O., & Truscott, W. G. (1975). The multiperiod location-allocation problem with relocation of facilities. Management Science, 22(1), 57–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay Dominik Jena
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jean-François Cordeau
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bernard Gendron
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Département d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelleUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Canada Research Chair in Logistics and TransportationHEC MontréalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur les réseaux d’entreprise, la logistique et le transport (CIRRELT)MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations