Skip to main content
Log in

Balancing fleet size and repositioning costs in LTL trucking

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an optimization modeling approach for analyzing the trade-off between the cost of a larger fleet of tractors and the cost of repositioning tractors for a trucking company operating a consolidation network, such as a less-than-truckload (LTL) company. Specifically, we analyze the value of using extra tractor repositioning moves (in addition to the ones required to balance resources throughout the network) to reduce the fixed costs of owning or leasing a tractor fleet during a planning horizon. We develop network flow optimization models, some with side constraints and nonlinear objective functions, using event-based, time-expanded networks to determine appropriate fleet sizes and extra repositioning moves under different repositioning strategies, and we compare the optimal costs of the strategies. For repositioning costs, two different cost schemes are explored: one linear and one nonlinear. Computational experiments using real data from a national LTL carrier compare the total system costs obtained with four different strategies and show that extra repositioning may indeed enable fleet size reductions and concomitant cost savings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaujon, G., & Turnquist, M. (1991). A model for fleet sizing and vehicle allocation. Transportation Science, 25(1), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceder, A. (2005). Estimation of fleet size for variable bus schedules. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1903, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceder, A., & Stern, H. (1981). Deficit function bus scheduling with deadheading trip insertions for fleet size reduction. Transportation Science, 15(4), 338–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejax, P., & Crainic, T. (1987). A review of empty flows and fleet management models in freight transportation. Transportation Science, 21(4), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y., & Hall, R. (1997). Fleet sizing and empty equipment redistribution for center-terminal transportation networks. Management Science, 43(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erera, A., Morales, J., & Savelsbergh, M. (2005). Global intermodal container management for the chemical industry. Transportation Research Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(6), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erera, A., Morales, J., & Savelsbergh, M. (2009). Robust optimization for empty repositioning problems. Operations Research, 57(2), 468–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, G., & Powell, W. (2002a). An adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for single-period fleet management problems I: Single period travel times. Transportation Science, 36, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, G., & Powell, W. (2002b). An adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for single-period fleet management problems II: Multiperiod travel times. Transportation Science, 36, 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papier, F., & Thonemann, U. (2008). Queueing models for sizing and structuring rental fleets. Transportation Science, 42(3), 302–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H., Bish, E., & Zhu, X. (2006). Airline fleet assignment concepts, models, and algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 172(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H., & Tuncbilek, C. (1997). Static and dynamic time-space strategic models and algorithms for multilevel rail-car fleet management. Management Science, 43(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H., & Ceder, A. (1983). An improved lower bound to the minimum fleet size problem. Transportation Science, 17(4), 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnquist, M., & Jordan, W. (1986). Fleet sizing under production cycles and uncertain travel times. Transportation Science, 20(4), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, J., Redmer, A., & Sawicki, P. (2008). Multiple objective optimization of the fleet sizing problem for road freight transportation. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 42(4), 379–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Savelsbergh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbajal, J.A., Erera, A. & Savelsbergh, M. Balancing fleet size and repositioning costs in LTL trucking. Ann Oper Res 203, 235–254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0924-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0924-1

Keywords

Navigation