Skip to main content
Log in

Using linear programming to analyze and optimize stochastic flow lines

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a linear programming approach to analyze and optimize flow lines with limited buffer capacities and stochastic processing times. The basic idea is to solve a huge but simple linear program that models an entire simulation run of a multi-stage production process in discrete time, to determine a production rate estimate. As our methodology is purely numerical, it offers the full modeling flexibility of stochastic simulation with respect to the probability distribution of processing times. However, unlike discrete-event simulation models, it also offers the optimization power of linear programming and hence allows us to solve buffer allocation problems. We show under which conditions our method works well by comparing its results to exact values for two-machine models and approximate simulation results for longer lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Kader, W. (2006). Capacity improvement of an unreliable production line–an analytical approach. Computers & Operations Research, 33, 1695–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altiok, T. (1996). Performance analysis of manufacturing systems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1993). Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, Y., & Gershwin, S. B. (1992). Manufacturing flow line systems: A review of models and analytical results. Queuing Systems Theory and Applications, 12(1–2), 3–94. Special issue on queuing models of manufacturing systems.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, D. (1962). A waiting line with interrupted service, including priorities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 24, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershwin, S. B. (1994). Manufacturing systems engineering. Englewood Cliffs: PTR/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershwin, S.B., & Schick, I. (1983). Modeling and analysis of three-stage transfer lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers. Operations Research, 31(2), 354–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershwin, S. B., & Schor, J. E. (2000). Efficient algorithms for buffer space allocation. Annals of Operations Research, 93, 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helber, S. (1999). Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems : Vol. 473. Performance analysis of flow lines with non-linear flow of material. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helber, S. (2001). Cash-flow-oriented buffer allocation in stochastic flow lines. International Journal of Production Research, 39, 3061–3083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helber, S., & Henken, K. (2010). Profit-oriented shift scheduling of inbound contact centers with skills-based routing, impatient customers, and retrials. Operations Research Spectrum, 32, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y., Eyler, M., & Chien, T. (1979). A gradient technique for general buffer storage design in production line. International Journal of Production Research, 17, 6 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isermann, R. (1987). Digitale Regelsysteme. Band I: Deterministische Regelungen. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johri, P. K. (1987). A linear programming approach to capacity estimation of automated production lines with finite buffers. International Journal of Production Research, 25, 851–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelton, W. D., Sadowski, R. P., & Sturrock, D. T. (2006). Simulation with Arena with CDROM (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (1991). Simulation modeling and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberopoulos, G., Papadopoulos, C. T., Tan, B., Smith, J. M., & Gershwin, J. M. (Eds.) (2006). Stochastic modeling of manufacturing systems. Advances in design, performance evaluation, and control issues. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matta, A., & Chefson, R. (2005). Formal properties of closed flow lines with limited buffer capacities and random processing times. In J. M. Felix-Teixera & A. E. C. Brito (Eds.), The 2005 European simulation and modelling conference (pp. 190–198), Porto.

  • Schruben, L. W. (2000). Mathematical programming models of discrete event system dynamics. In J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, & P. A. Fishwick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2000 winter simulation conference (pp. 381–385).

  • Swain, J. J. (2007). Simulation software survey. OR/MS Today, 34(5).

  • Tan, B. (2003). State-space modeling and analysis of pull-controlled production systems. In S. B. Gershwin, Y. Dallery, C. T. Papadopoulos, & Smith MacGregor, J. (Eds.), Analysis and modeling of manufacturing systems (pp. 363–398). Amsterdam: Kluwer. Chapter 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijms, H. C. (1994). Stochastic models. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran-Gia, P. (1996). Analytische Leistungsbewertung verteilter Systeme. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Helber.

Additional information

The authors thank the anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helber, S., Schimmelpfeng, K., Stolletz, R. et al. Using linear programming to analyze and optimize stochastic flow lines. Ann Oper Res 182, 193–211 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0692-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0692-3

Keywords

Navigation