Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 158, Issue 1, pp 205–218 | Cite as

Depreciation games

Article

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to show how Game Theory can be used in the day-to-day running of a company. No precedent, as far as we know, in the literature of the application of Cooperative Game Theory in order to obtain new depreciation methods for a fixed asset which is owned by a company. To this end, we will first illustrate the usual depreciation methods employed in accountancy. Then, with the objective of finding new depreciation methods, we will establish the relationship between Game Theory and Accountancy. On the basis of this relationship we introduce some new depreciation methods. Finally, a family of solutions is defined which improves the properties of traditional and previously introduced methods.

Keywords

Game theory Cost allocation Depreciation Accountancy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aivazian, V. A., & Callen, J. L. (1983). Core theory and uniformity in accounting: rationalizing the accounting rulemaker. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2, 225–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcelus, F. J., Bhadury, J., & Srinivasan, G. (1997). On the interaction between indirect cost allocations and the firm’s objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 445–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callen, J. L. (1978). Financial cost allocations: a game-theoretic approach. In The accounting review (pp. 303–308). Google Scholar
  4. Cushing, B. E. (1999). Economic analysis of accountants’ ethical standards: the case of audit opinion shopping. Accounting and Public Policy, 18, 339–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2005a). IFRS in your pocket 2005. Google Scholar
  6. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2005b). Deloitte’s comparison of international financial reporting standards and United States GAAP. Google Scholar
  7. Dubey, P. (1982). The Shapley value as Aircraft Landing Fees. Management Science, 28, 869–874. Google Scholar
  8. FASB (2004). FASB and IASB discuss plans for the future. http://www.fasb.org.
  9. FASB (2005a). Memorandum of understanding. http://www.fasb.org.
  10. FASB (2005b). Statements of financial accounting standards. http://www.fasb.org.
  11. Kimmel, P. D., Weygandt, J. J., & Kieso, D. E. (2004). Accounting principles (7th ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  12. Kliger, D., & Levikson, B. (2002). Pricing no claims discount systems. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 191–204. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Littlechild, S. C. (1970). Marginal-cost pricing with joint costs. Economic Journal, 80(318), 323–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Littlechild, S. C. (1974). A simple expression for the nucleolus in a special case. International Journal of Game Theory, 3, 21–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Littlechild, S. C. (1975). Common costs, fixed charges, clubs and games. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 117–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Littlechild, S. C., & Owen, G. (1973). A simple expression for the Shapley value in a special case. Management Science, 20, 370–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Littlechild, S. C., & Owen, G. (1976). A further note on the nucleolus of the airport game. International Journal of Game Theory, 5, 91–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. March, J. G. (1987). Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 153–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Official Journal of the European Union (2002). Regulation 1606/2002 of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. http://europa.eu.int.
  20. Official Journal of the European Union (2003). Regulation 1725/2003 of 29 September 2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with regulation 1606/2002, July 19, 2002. http://europa.eu.int.
  21. Owen, G. (1995). Game theory (3rd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  22. Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163–1170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Annals of Mathematics Studies : Vol. 28. Contributions to the theory of games II (pp. 307–317). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  24. Shubik, M. (1962). Incentives, decentralized control, the assignment of joint costs and internal pricing. Management Science, April 1962, 325–343. Google Scholar
  25. Tijs, S. H., & Driessen, T. S. H. (1986). Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Science, 32, 1015–1028. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Operations Research CenterUniversity Miguel Hernández of ElcheElche (Alicante)Spain

Personalised recommendations