Skip to main content

Evaluation of Commodity Trading Advisors using fixed and variable and benchmark models

Abstract

This paper examines the performance of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) using fixed and variable benchmarking models. In order to avoid the troublesome passive and active commodity and managed futures benchmarks (indices) when examining the performance of CTAs, we innovate by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Because this alternative class has non-linear returns due to long/short positions, and derivatives (i.e., dynamic trading strategies), DEA can alleviate the problems usually associated with these indices. The effectiveness of using benchmarking models in a DEA setting will provide investors with an alternative technique in assessing the performance and identifying efficient CTAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Brorsen, B.W., and J.P. Townsend. (2002). “Performance Persistence for Managed Futures.” Journal of Alternative Investments, 4, 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diz, F. (2001). “Are Investors Over-Invested in Equities?” Derivatives Quarterly, 7, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diz, F., G.N. Gregoriou, F. Rouah and S.E. Satchell. (2005). “Simple and Cross Efficiency of CTAs using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Finance, 11, 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diz, F. and S. Waksman. (1998). “On the Value of Different Measures of Volatility to Rank Commodity Trading Advisors.” Derivatives Quarterly, 4, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F.R. and C.W. Ma. (1988). “Commodity Fund Performance: Is the Information Contained in Fund Prospectuses Useful?” Journal of Futures Markets, 8, 589–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F.R. and M.O. Caglayan. (2001). “Hedge Fund and Commodity Fund Investment Styles in Bull and Bear Markets.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 27, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W. and D.A. Hsieh. (2000). “Performance Characteristics of Hedge Funds and CTA Funds: Natural Versus Spurious Biases.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, G. (2001). “Benefits of Commodity Investments.” CISDM Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Gregoriou, G.N. (2003). “Performance Evaluation of Funds of Hedge Funds using Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of Wealth Management, 5, 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, G.N., K. Sedzro, and J. Zhu. (2005). “Hedge Fund Performance Appraisal using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research, 164, 555–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, S., T. Krukemyer, and C.R. Zulauf. (1992). “Are Public Commodity Funds a Good Investment?” In C. Peters (ed.), Managed Futures, Probus Publishing Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, S., C.R. Zulauf, and B. Ward. (1994). “The Predictability of Managed Futures Returns.” Journal of Derivatives, 2, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kat, H.M. (2003). “Ten Things Investors Should Know About Hedge Fund.” Journal of Wealth Management, 5, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kat, H.M. (2004). “Managed Futures and Hedge Funds: A Match Made in Heaven.” In G.N. Gregoriou, V.N. Karavas, F.S. LHabitant, and F. Rouah (eds.), Commodity Trading Advisors; Risk, Performance, Analysis and Selection, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, H. (1996). “The Stability of Variance and Return Forecasts: A Monte Carlo Simulation.” CISDM Working Paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schneeweis, T. (1996). The Benefits of Managed Futures. London: EMFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis, T. and G. Georgiev. (2002). “The Benefits of Managed Futures.” CISDM Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schneeweis, T., U. Savanayana, and D. McCarthy. (1991). “Alternative Commodity Trading Vehicles: A Performance Analysis.” Journal of Futures Markets, 11, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis, T. and R.T. Spurgin. (1997). “Comparison of Commodity and Managed Futures Benchmark Indices.” Journal of Derivatives, 4, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis, T., R.T. Spurgin, and G. Georgiev. (2001). “Benchmarking Commodity Trading Advisor Performance with a Passive Futures-Based Index.” CISDM Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schneeweis, T., R.T. Spurgin, and D. McCarthy. (1996). “Informational Content in Historical CTA Performance.” CISDM Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schneeweis, T. and R.T. Spurgin. (1996). “Comparison of Commodity and Managed Futures Benchmark Indices.” CISDM Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schneeweis, T., R. Spurgin and M. Potter. (1996). “Managed Futures and Hedge Fund Investment for Downside Equity Risk Management.” Derivatives Quarterly, 3, 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, K. and J. Zhu. (2001). “Portfolio Evaluation and Benchmark Selection: A Mathematical Programming Approach.” Journal of Alternative Investments, 4, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, K. and J. Zhu. (2003). “Classifying Hedge Funds Using Data Envelopment Analysis.” In G.N. Gregoriou, V.N. Karavas, and F. Rouah (eds.), Hedge Funds: Strategies, Risk Assessment and Returns. Beard Books, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2003) Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Kluwer Publications, Norwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg N. Gregoriou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gregoriou, G.N., Chen, Y. Evaluation of Commodity Trading Advisors using fixed and variable and benchmark models. Ann Oper Res 145, 183–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0030-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0030-y

Keywords

  • Managed futures
  • Benchmark
  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • Performance