Skip to main content
Log in

Composite-variable modeling for service parts logistics

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 July 2006

Abstract

Service parts logistics focuses on providing repair parts for computer, medical, and other high-cost equipment, typically in a very short period of time. Problems within this domain are often challenging to solve, due to the complexity of the network, tight constraints on time and warehouse capacity, and the high costs of inventory and transportation resources. Mathematical modeling can be critical in solving such difficult problems, but basic modeling approaches often suffer from complicating factors such as large numbers of constraints and integer variables, non-linearities, and weak linear programming relaxations. To address some of these difficulties, we present a modeling framework based on composite variables---variables that encompass multiple decisions. We begin by considering the problem of how to stock those repair parts which are both high cost and very low demand. We then discuss how this relatively simple problem can become much more computationally challenging when we expand the scope to consider a more global view of the system. As an example, we consider what happens when warehouse capacity constraints are added. We show that a basic modeling approach to this new problem is intractable for many instances of realistic size. We then present a composite-variable model and show how it enables us to improve tractability significantly. Our experience suggests potential opportunities to be found in modeling other SPL problems within a composite-variable framework as well. We conclude by presenting modeling approaches to address a broad class of problems within this challenging and important arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfredsson, P. and J. Verrijdt. (1999). “Modeling Emergency Supply Flexibility in a Two-Echelon Inventory System.” Management Science, 45, 1416–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelgren, L.H. (1969). “A Column Generation Algorithm for a Ship Scheduling Problem.” Transportation Science, 3, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armacost, A., C. Barnhart, and K. Ware. (2002). “Composite Variable Formulations for Express Shipment Service Network Design.” Transportation Science, 36, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axsäter, S. (1990). “Modelling Emergency Lateral Transshipments in Inventory Systems.” Management Science, 36, 1329–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, C., E. Johnson, G. Nemhauser, M. Savelsbergh, and P. Vance. (1998). “Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs.” Operations Research, 46, 316–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, C., A. Farahat, and M. Lohatepanont. (2004). “Airline Fleet Assignment: An Alternative Model and Solution Approach Based on Composite Variables.” Submitted to Operations Research.

  • Cheung, K.L. and W. Hausman. (1995). “Multiple Failures in a Multi-Item Spares Inventory Model.” IIE Transactions, 27, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceria, S., P. Nobili, and A. Sassano. (1997). “Set Covering Problem.” In Mauro Dell'Amico, Francesco Maffioli, and Silvano Martello (eds.), Annotated Bibliographies in Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization.

  • Cohen, M., C. Cull, H. Lee, and D. Willen. (2000). “Saturn7apos;s Supply-Chain Innovation: High Value in After-Sales Service.” Sloan Management Review, Summer, 93–101.

  • Cohen, M., P. Kamesam, P. Kleindorfer, H. Lee, and A. Tekerian. (1990). “Optimizer: IBM's Multi-Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics.” INTERFACES, 20, 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., P. Kleindorfer, and H. Lee. (1986). “Optimal Stocking Policies for Low Usage Items in Multi-Echelon Inventory Systems.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 33, 17–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., Y.-S. Zheng, and V. Agrawal. (1997). “Service Parts Logistics: A Benchmark Analysis.” IIE Transactions, 29, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. (2002). “Composite-Variable Modeling for Large-Scale Problems in Transportation and Logistics.” Dissertation, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Cohn, A. and C. Barnhart. (2003). “Improving Crew Scheduling By Incorporating Key Maintenance Routing Decisions.” Operations Research, 51, 387–396.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Crainic, T. and J.-M. Rousseau. (1987). “The Column Generation Principle and the Airline Crew Scheduling Problem.” Infor, 25, 136–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G. and P. Wolfe. (1960). “Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs.” Operations Research, 8, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desaulniers, G., J. Desrosiers, Y. Dumas, M. Solomon, and F. Soumis. (1997). “Daily Aircraft Routing and Scheduling.” Management Science 43, 841–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A. (1970). “Elements of Large-Scale Mathematical Programming.” Management Science 16, 652–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. (1985). “A Multi-Echelon Inventory Model for a Repairable Item with One-for-One Replenishment.” Management Science, 31, 1247–1256.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. (1987). “Recent Advances in the Decomposition Approach to Linear Programming.” Mathematical Programming Study, 31, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., I. Lustig, J. Farvolden, and W. Powell. (1993). “Multicommodity Network Flows: The Impact of Formulation on Decomposition.” Mathematical Programming, 62, 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahotepanont, M. and C. Barnhart. (2004). “Airline Schedule Planning: Integrated Models and Algorithms for Schedule Design and Fleet Assignment.” Transportation Science, 38, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1999). Large Scale Linear and Integer Optimization: A Unified Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Muckstadt, J. and M. Isaac. (1981). “An Analysis of Single Item Inventory Systems With Returns.” Naval Research Logistics, 28, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H. and W. Adams. (1994). “A Hierarchy of Relaxations and Convex Hull Characterizations for Mixed-Integer Zero-One Programming Problems.” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 52, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbrooke, C. (1968). “METRIC: A Multi-Echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control.” Operations Research, 16, 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbeck, F. (2000). “On Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition in Integer Programming and Ways to Perform Branching in a Branch-and-Price Algorithm.” Operations Research, 48, 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbeck, F. and L. Wolsey. (1996). “An Exact Algorithm for IP Column Generation.” Operations Research Letters, 19, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2001). “Service Parts Logistics: Modeling, Analysis, and Application.” Disseration, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Mainville Cohn.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0055-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohn, A.M. Composite-variable modeling for service parts logistics. Ann Oper Res 144, 17–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0011-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0011-1

Keywords

Navigation