Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Planning of a Multi-Station System with Sojourn Time Constraints

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a dynamic production system where multiple products must visit stations where inventories are constrained by maximum and minimum sojourn times with neither negative flow nor backlog being allowed. A resource availability constraint limits the aggregate throughput of the stations. The objective is to minimize the sum of flow and inventory cost. The problem is broken down into several single-product serial systems that serve as subroutines of a Lagrangian relaxation routine. This model is implemented in a spreadsheet so that it can be used by the officials of a Chilean institution for planning the operations and defining the optimal allocation of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altiok, T. (2000). “Tandem Queues in Bulk Port Operations.” Annals of Operations Research 93, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auslander, A., R. Cominetti, and M. Haddou. (1997). “Asymptotic Analysis for Penalty and Barrier Methods in Convex and Linear Programming.” Mathematics of Operational Research 22, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D., G. Evans, and M. Naim. (1998). “Pipeline Information Survey: A UK Perspective.” Omega 26, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. and B. Arntzen. (1999). “The Simultaneous Planning of Production, Capacity, and Inventory in Seasonal Demand Environments.” Operations Research 47, 795–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. (1998). “Stationary Policies in Multiechelon Inventory Systems with Deterministic Demand and Backlogging.” Operations Research 46, S26–S34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, Y. and S.B. Gershwin. (1992). “Manufacturing Flow Line Systems: A Review of Models and Analytical Results.” Queueing Systems Theory and Applications 12, 3–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (1979). “The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems.” Management Science 22, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRONTLINE SYSTEMS 2000. Premium Solver Platform. http://www.frontsys.com

  • Ganesh, A.J. (1998). “Large Deviations of the Sojourn Time for Queues in Series.” Annals of Operations Research 79, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govil, M. and M. FU. (1999). “Queueing Theory in Manufacturing: A Survey.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 18, 214–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S.C., D.B. Kletter, and W.B. Hetzel. (1998). “A Dynamic Model for Requirements Planning with Application to Supply Chain Optimization.” Operations Research 46, S35–S49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.C. (1998). “Can We Have Confidence in Generic Structures?” Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, 936–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, L., Z. Przasnysky, and K. Seal. (1997). “Spreadsheets and OR/MS Models: An End-User Perspective.” Interfaces 26, 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo, M. and M. Singer. (1999). “A Shifting Bottleneck Heuristic for Minimizing the Total Weighted Tardiness in a Job Shop.” Naval Research and Logistics 46, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosling, K. (1998). “Optimal Inventory Policies for Assembly Systems Under Random Demands.” Operations Research 37, 365–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (2000). “Forecasting Policies for Scheduling a Stochastic Due Date Job Shop.” International Journal of Production Research 38, 3623–3637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (2001). “Decomposition Methods for Large Job Shops.” Computers and Operations Research 28, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., P. Donoso, and S. Jara. (2002). “Fleet Configuration Subject to Stochastic Demand: An Application in the Distribution of Liquefied Petroleum gas.” Journal of the Operations Research Society 53, 961–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., P. Donoso, and F. Poblete. (2002). “Semi-Autonomous Planning Using Linear Programming in the Chilean General Treasury.” European Journal of Operations Research 140, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maaren, H. and T. Terlaky (1997). “Inverse Barriers and CES Functions in Linear Programming.” Operational Research Letters 20, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B. and S. Yeralan. (1997). “A Decomposition Model for Continuous Materials Flow Production Systems.” International Journal of Production Research 35, 2759–2772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., H. Yan, and S. Sethi. (1999). “Optimal Production Planning in Pull Flow Lines with Multiple Products.” European Journal of Operational Research 119, 582–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Singer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, M., Donoso, P. & Noguer, J.L. Optimal Planning of a Multi-Station System with Sojourn Time Constraints. Ann Oper Res 138, 203–222 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2454-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2454-1

Keywords

Navigation