Skip to main content

Intra-body communications: radio-frequency versus ultrasonic


Ultrasonics have been used in a number of biomedical and civil application ranging from medical ultrasound devices to beam deformation non-destructive testing. Ultrasonic pressure waves have been used naturally for thousands of years by animals for navigation and communication, with the prime examples being bats with ultrasonic navigation through air and dolphins with ultrasonic communication and navigation in water. This paper investigates on signal propagation within the human being by means of intra-body communications without radio-frequency waves but, instead, with lower (if not deeply lower) frequency waves. An exhaustive review of up-to-date propagation modes in water-like vectors is performed and experimental measurements allow the setting up of a comparison with conventional propagation. A practical demonstrator has been developed to characterize within a low frequency range the ultrasonic wave one-direction propagation in piece of meat.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19


  1. 1.

    Zimmerman, T. (1995) Personal area networks (PAN) : Near-field intrabody communication. Master Thesis, MIT.

  2. 2.

    Wegmueller, M. (2007) Intra-Body Communication for Biomedical Sensor Networks, PhD. Thesis, ETH Zurich.

  3. 3.

    Pun, S., Gao, Y. M., Mak, P. U., Du, M., Vai, M. I. (2009) Modeling for intra-body communication with bone effect, In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC.

  4. 4.

    Handa, T., Shoji, S., Ike, S., Takeda, S., Sekiguchi, T. (1997) A very low-power consumption wireless ECG monitoring system using body as a signal transmission medium. In 1997 International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators.

  5. 5.

    Seyedi, M., Kibret, B., Lai, D., & Faulkner, M. (2013). A survey on intrabody communications for body area network applications. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 60(8), 2067–2079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mast, T. D. (2000). Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 1, 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lees, S., Ahern, J. M., & Leonard, M. (1983). Parameters influencing the sonic velocity in compact calcified tissues of various species. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aroyan, J. L. (1996). Three-dimensional numerical simulation of biosonar signal emission and reception in the common dolphin, Ph.D, Thesis, University of California Santa Cru.

  9. 9.

    Mast, T. D., Hinkelman, L. M., Metlay, L. A., Orr, M. J., & Waag, R. C. (1999). Simulation of ultrasonic pulse propagation, distortion, and attenuation in the human chest wall. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3665–3677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Galluccio, L., Melodia, T., Palazzo, S., Santagati, G. (2012). Challenges and implications of using ultrasonic communications in intra-body area networks. In 9th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), (pp. 182,189).

  11. 11.

    McGough, R. J., Nariyoshi, P., Yang, Y., Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., Beard, P. B. (2011). FOCUS. MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francois Rivet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivet, F., Owen, N., Lai, D.T.H. et al. Intra-body communications: radio-frequency versus ultrasonic. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 87, 289–299 (2016).

Download citation


  • Intra-body communications
  • Ultrasonic
  • Body area network