Intentional-overlapping for multicarrier schemes based on user-specific filters

  • Z. Esad Ankaralı
  • Alphan Şahin
  • Hüseyin Arslan


In this study, we introduce controlled overlapping in time and frequency between neighboring symbols in multicarrier schemes to increase spectral efficiency. Conventionally, multicarrier schemes are designed based on Nyquist criterion to avoid inter-carrier interference and inter-symbol interference. Also, the time–frequency lattice and the prototype filter are designed considering the worst-case of time-varying multipath channel. However, this approach ignores to make use of multi-user diversity and leads excessive spacings between successive symbols in time and frequency. Unlike the conventional methods, in this study, symbols are allowed to be overlapped (depending on time–frequency dispersion of their individual channels) as long as the signal-to-interference ratios observed by all users are kept above a certain level. Additionally, in order to achieve more flexibility in packing symbols, user specific filters that have different time–frequency characteristics are utilized. This enables further spectral efficiency improvement in our system design.


FMT Roll-off factor Root raised cosine Intentional overlapping Adaptive filtering 


  1. 1.
    Saltzberg, B. (1967). Performance of an efficient parallel data transmission system. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, 15(6), 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, R. W. (1966). Synthesis of band-limited orthogonal signals for multichannel data transmission. Bell System Technical Journal, 45, 1775–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mazo, J. E. (1975). Faster-than-Nyquist signaling. Bell System Technical Journal, 54, 1451–1462.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rusek, F., & Anderson, J. (2005). The two dimensional Mazo limit. In Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on information theory (ISIT) (pp. 970–974).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rusek, F., & Anderson, J. B. (2006). Successive interference cancellation in multistream faster-than-Nyquist signaling. In Proceedings of the International wireless communication and mobile computing conference (pp. 1021–1026). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mishra, A., Rozner, E., Banerjee, S., & Arbaugh, W. (2005). Exploiting partially overlapping channels in wireless networks: turning a peril into an advantage. In ACM/USENIX internet measurement conference.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mishra, A., Shrivastava, V., Banerjee, S., & Arbaugh, W. (2006). Partially overlapped channels not considered harmful. In SIGMETRICS performance evaluation review (Vol. 34).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2008). How much improvement can we get from partially overlapped channels? In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC (pp. 2957–2962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, H., Yu, H., Liu, X., Chuah, C., & Mohapatra, P. (2007). Scheduling multiple partially overlapped channels in wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of ICC.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ankarali, Z. E., Sahin, A., & Arslan, H. (2012). Adaptive roll-off factor utilization in FMT-based FBMC burst structures. In SDR forum, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cherubini, G., Eleftheriou, E., & Olcer, S. (1999). Filtered multitone modulation for VDSL. In Proceedings of the IEEE global telecommunication conference (GLOBECOM), Rio de Janeiro (Vol. 2, pp. 1139–1144).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cherubini, G., Eleftheriou, E., & Olcer, S. (2002). Filtered multitone modulation for very high-speed digital subscriber lines. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 20(5), 1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sahin, A., Güvenç, I., & Arslan, H. (2012). A survey on multicarrier communications: Prototype filters, lattice structures, and implementation aspects. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, abs/1212.3374.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chuang, J. C. I. (1987). The effects of time delay spread on portable radio communications channels with digital modulation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, SAC-5, 879–889.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moré J. J. (1978). The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Numerical analysis, (pp. 105–116). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Esad Ankaralı
    • 1
  • Alphan Şahin
    • 1
  • Hüseyin Arslan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations