Skip to main content
Log in

A low-power voltage-controlled oscillator with current-switched technique

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A low-power voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) with current-switched technique is presented. The circuit is implemented in 0.18-μm CMOS technology. In the design, a large inductor is used for low-power and low-phase-noise application, whereas a switched capacitor bank and two pairs of MOS varactors are adopted for coarse tuning and fine tuning respectively. The proposed VCO is biased at the boundary of the current and voltage limited region for a good trade-off between power consumption and phase noise. The phase noise of the proposed VCO is reduced in each sub-band by a current-switched technique, and a phase noise improvement of as much as 2.75 dB has been achieved. The proposed VCO has a measured tuning range of 15.2 % from 4.34 to 5.05 GHz and dissipates an average power of 3.78 mW at 1.2 V supply voltage, whereas its measured phase noise and figure of merit FOMT are −113.0 dBc/Hz and −183.7 at 1 MHz offset from the frequency of 4.36 GHz respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hegazi, E., Sjoland, H., & Abidi, A. A. (2001). A filtering technique to lower LC oscillator phase noise. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 36(12), 1921–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreani, P., & Sjoland, H. (2002). Tail current noise suppression in RF CMOS VCOs. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37(3), 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levantino, S., Samori, C., Bonfanti, A., Gierkink, S. L. J., Lacaita, A. L., & Boccuzzi, V. (2002). Frequency dependence on bias current in 5-GHz CMOS VCOs: impact on tuning range and flicker noise upconversion. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37(8), 1003–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jerng, A., & Sodini, C. G. (2005). The impact of device type and sizing on phase noise mechanisms. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 40(2), 360–3695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kenneth, K. O., Park, N., & Yang, D. J. (2002). 1/f noise of NMOS and PMOS transistors and their implications to design of voltage controlled oscillators, In IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Symposium (pp. 59–62).

  6. De Muer, B., Borremans, M., Steyaert, M., & Li Puma, G. (2000). A 2-GHz low-phase-noise integrated LC-VCO set with flicker noise up-conversion minimization. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 35(7), 1034–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Astis, G. D., Cordeau, D., Paillot, J.-M., & Dascalescu, L. (2005). A 5-GHz fully integrated full PMOS low-phase-noise LC VCO. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 40(10), 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, Z., & Niknejad, A. M. (2011). A 4-port-inductor-based VCO coupling method for phase noise Reduction. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 46(8), 1772–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ugur Uyanik, H., & Tarim, N. (2007). Compact low voltage high-Q CMOS active inductor suitable for RF applications. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 51, 191–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kytonaki, E.-S. A., & Papananos, Y. (2011). A low-voltage differentially tuned current-adjusted 5.5-GHz quadrature VCO in 65-nm CMOS technology. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Part II: Express Briefs, 58(5), 254–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, Y.-H., Jang, S.-L., Lee, S.-H., Yen, R.-H., & Jhao, J–. J. (2007). 5-GHz low power current-reused balanced CMOS differential Armstrong VCO. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters, 17(2), 139–141.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzel, F., Erzgraber, H., & Ilkov, N. (2000). A new approach to fully integrated CMOS LC-oscillators with a very large tuning range, In IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (pp. 573–576).

  13. Lu, L.-H., Hsieh, H–. H., & Liao, Y.-T. (2006). A wide tuning-range CMOS VCO with a differential tunable active inductor. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Technique, 54(9), 3462–3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berny, A. D., Niknejad, A. M., & Meyer, R. G. (2003). A wideband low-phase-noise CMOS VCO, In IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (pp. 555–558).

  15. Rael, J., & Abidi, A. (2000). Physical processes of phase noise in differential LC oscillators, In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (pp. 569–572).

  16. Tiebout, M. (2001). Low-power low-phase-noise differentially tuned quadrature VCO design in standard CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 36(7), 1018–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, T. H., & Hajimiri, A. (2000). Oscillator phase noise: A tutorial. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 35(3), 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-S., & Wang, Y.-C. (2009). A 38% tuning bandwidth low phase noise differential voltage controlled oscillator using a 0.5 μm E/D-PHEMT process. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters, 19(7), 467–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu, Y.-K., & Chuang, H.-R. (2003). A fully integrated 5.8 GHz U-NII band 0.18-μm CMOS VCO. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters, 13(7), 287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai, M.-D., Cho, Y.-H., & Wang, H. (2005). A 5-GHz low phase noise differential colpitts CMOS VCO. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters, 15(5), 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixiong Sheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheng, Z., Yu, F. A low-power voltage-controlled oscillator with current-switched technique. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 76, 103–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-013-0081-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-013-0081-3

Keywords

Navigation