Advertisement

A low-rate identification method for digital predistorters based on Volterra kernel interpolation

  • Peter SingerlEmail author
  • Heinz Koeppl
Article

Abstract

A novel identification and digital predistortion scheme of weakly nonlinear passband systems such as RF power amplifiers (PA) is presented. It is well known that for the identification of weakly nonlinear systems, despite the spectral regrowth, it suffices to sample the input-output (I/O) data of the system at the Nyquist rate of the input signal. Many applications such as linearization (digital predistortion) and mixed signal simulations require system models at a higher sampling rate than Nyquist. Up to now the construction of such high-rate predistorters has been done by oversampling the corresponding I/O data. This leads to high computational complexity, ill-posedness of the estimation, and high demand on the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) sampling rate for the implementation. This paper discusses an efficient way to obtain high-rate predistorters from low-rate system models and shows the validity of the proposed scheme for a 5th-order complex baseband PA model, where adjacent channel power suppression of 20 dB is achieved.

Keywords

Digital predistortion Nonlinear system identification Volterra kernel interpolation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank D. Schwingshackl and C. Vogel from the Graz University of Technology for their helpful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Benedetto, S., Biglieri, E., & Daffara, R. (1979). Modeling and performance evaluation of nonlinear satellite links—a Volterra series approach. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 15, 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benedetto, S., & Biglieri, E. (1999). Principles of digital transmission with wireless applications. Kluwer Academic/Plenium Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavers, J. K. (1989). Amplifier linearization using a digital predistorter with fast adaption and low memory requirenments. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 37, 1885–1890.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cripps, S. C. (1999). RF power amplifiers for wireless communications. Boston, London: Artech House.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cripps, S. C. (2002). Advanced techniques in RF power amplifier design. Boston, London: Artech House.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, L., Raich, R., & Zhou, G. T. (2002). A Hammerstein predistortion linearization design based on the indirect learning architecture. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2002. Proceedings. (ICASSP ’02), May 2002 (pp. 2689–2692).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, L., Zhou, G. T., Morgan, D. R., Ma, Z., & Kenney, S. (2002). Memory polynomial predistorter based on the indirect learning architecture. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM, Nov. 2002 (pp. 967–971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eun, C., & Powers, E. J. (1997). A new Volterra predistorter based on the indirect learning architecture. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank, W.A. (1996). Sampling requirements for Volterra system identification. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 3, 266–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao, X. Y., & Snelgrove, W. M. (1990). Adaptive linearization schemes for weakly nonlinear systems using adaptive linear and nonlinear FIR filters. In IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Aug. 1990 (pp. 9–12).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennington, P. B. (2000). High linearity RF amplifier design. Boston, London: Artech House.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathews, V. J., & Sicuranza, G. L. (2000) Polynomial signal processing. John Wiley & Sons, INC.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raich, R., Qian, H., & Zhou, G. T. (2003). Digital baseband predistortion of nonlinear power amplifiers using orthogonal polynomials. in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Proceedings. (ICASSP ’03), Apr. 2003 (pp. 689–692).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rugh, W. J. (2002). Nonlinear system theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schetzen, M. (1980). The Volterra and Wiener theories of nonlinear systems. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singerl, P., & Koeppl, H. (2005). Volterra kernel interpolation for system modeling and predistortion purposes. In IEEE International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS) (Vol. 1, pp. 251–254). Iasi, Romania, July 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singerl, P., & Kubin, G. (2005) Chebyshev approximation of baseband Volterra series for wideband RF power amplifiers. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), (Vol. 3, pp. 2655–2658). Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeqing, Q., Qi, L., & Tianren, Y. (2003). Analysis of different predistortion structures and efficient least-square adaptive algorithms. in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2, 461–464.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Christian Doppler Laboratory for Nonlinear Signal ProcessingGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Infineon Technologies Austria AGVillachAustria
  3. 3.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations