Skip to main content
Log in

Interpolation and the projective Beth property in well-composed logics

  • Published:
Algebra and Logic Aims and scope

We study the interpolation and Beth definability problems in propositional extensions of minimal logic J. Previously, all J-logics with the weak interpolation property (WIP) were described, and it was proved that WIP is decidable over J. In this paper, we deal with so-called well-composed J-logics, i.e., J-logics satisfying an axiom (⊥ → A) ∨ (A → ⊥). Representation theorems are proved for well-composed logics possessing Craig’s interpolation property (CIP) and the restricted interpolation property (IPR). As a consequence, we show that only finitely many well-composed logics share these properties and that IPR is equivalent to the projective Beth property (PBP) on the class of well-composed J-logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Johansson, “Der Minimalkalkül, ein reduzierter intuitionistischer Formalismus,” Comp. Math., 4, 119–136 (1937).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Craig, “Three uses of Herbrand–Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory,” J. Symb. Log., 22, 269–285 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Barwise and S. Feferman (eds.), Model-Theoretic Logics, Springer, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. M. Gabbay and L. Maksimova, Interpolation and Definability: Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2005).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Schütte, “Der Interpolationssatz der intuitionistischen Prädikatenlogik,” Math. Ann., 148, No. 3, 192–200 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. D. M. Gabbay, Semantical Investigations in Heyting’s Intuitionistic Logic, Synthese Library, 148, Reidel, Dordrecht (1981).

  7. E. W. Beth, “On Padoa’s method in the theory of definitions,” Indag. Math., 15, No. 4, 330–339 (1953).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. L. Maksimova, “Craig’s theorem in superintuitionistic logics and amalgamable varieties of pseudo-Boolean algebras,” Algebra Logika, 16, No. 6, 643–681 (1977).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L. L. Maksimova, “Intuitionistic logic and implicit definability,” Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 105, Nos. 1–3, 83–102 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. L. Maksimova, “Decidability of the projective Beth property in varieties of Heyting algebras,” Algebra Logika, 40, No. 3, 290–301 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. L. L. Maksimova, “Implicit definability and positive logics,” Algebra Logika, 42, No. 1, 65–93 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Maksimova, “Problem of restricted interpolation in superintuitionistic and some modal logics,” Log. J. IGPL, 18, No. 3, 367–380 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. L. Maksimova, “The projective Beth property and interpolation in positive and related logics,” Algebra Logika, 45, No. 1, 85–113 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. L. L. Maksimova, “Decidability of the weak interpolation property over the minimal logic,” Algebra Logika, 50, No. 2, 152–188 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Maksimova, “Interpolation and joint consistency,” in We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of D. Gabbay. Vol. 2, S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A. d’Avila Garcez, et al. (eds.) King’s Coll. Publ., London (2005), pp. 293–305.

  16. L. L. Maksimova, “Joint consistency in extensions of the minimal logic,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 51, No. 3, 604–619 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Maksimova, “Interpolation and definability over the logic Gl,” Stud. Log., 99, Nos. 1–3, 249–267 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. L. L. Maksimova, “Interpolation and definability in extensions of the minimal logic,” Algebra Logika, 44, No. 6, 726–750 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L. L. Maksimova, “Projective Beth properties in modal and superintuitionistic logics,” Algebra Logika, 38, No. 3, 316–333 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Kreisel, “Explicit definability in intuitionistic logic,” J. Symb. Log., 25, No. 4, 389–390 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Maksimova, “Restricted interpolation in modal logics,” in Adv. Modal Log., Vol. 4, King’s Coll. Publ., London (2003), pp. 297–311.

  22. A. I. Mal’tsev, Algebraic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Miura, “A remark on the intersection of two logics,” Nagoya Math. J., 26, 167–171 (1966).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Odintsov, “Logic of classic refutability and class of extensions of minimal logic,” Log. Log. Phil., 9, 91–107 (2001).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. L. L. Maksimova, “A weak form of interpolation in equational logic,” Algebra Logika, 47, No. 1, 94–107 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Jonsson, “Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive,” Math. Scand., 21, 110–121 (1967).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. L. Maksimova.

Additional information

Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 244-275, March-April, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maksimova, L.L. Interpolation and the projective Beth property in well-composed logics. Algebra Logic 51, 163–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-012-9180-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-012-9180-y

Keywords

Navigation