Skip to main content
Log in

Decidability of the interpolation problem and of related properties in tabular logics

  • Published:
Algebra and Logic Aims and scope

Propositional modal and positive logics are considered as well as extensions of Johansson’s minimal logic. It is proved that basic versions of the interpolation property and of the Beth definability property, and also the Hallden property, are decidable on the class of tabular logics, i.e., logics given by finitely many finite algebras. Algorithms are described for constructing counterexamples to each of the properties mentioned in handling cases where the logic under consideration does not possess the required property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. W. Beth, “On Padoa’s method in the theory of definitions,” Indag. Math., 15, No. 4, 330-339 (1953).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Craig, “Three uses of Herbrand–Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory,” J. Symb. Log., 22, No. 3, 269-285 (1957).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Jonsson, “Extensions of relational structures,” in Theory of Models, Proc. Int. Symp., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965), pp. 146-157.

  4. J. Barwise and S. Feferman (eds.), Model-Theoretic Logics, Springer, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. M. Gabbay and L. Maksimova, Interpolation and Definability: Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, Clarendon Press, Oxford (2005).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Maksimova, “Decidable properties of logical calculi and of varieties of algebras,” in Logic Colloquium’ 03, Lect. Notes Log., 24, Assoc. Symb. Log. (2006), pp. 146-166.

  7. L. L. Maksimova, “Craig’s theorem in superintuitionistic logics and amalgamable varieties of pseudo-Boolean algebras,” Algebra Logika, 16, No. 6, 643-681 (1977).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. L. Maksimova, “Implicit definability and positive logics,” Algebra Logika, 42, No. 1, 65-93 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L. L. Maksimova, “Definability and interpolation in non-classical logics,” Stud. Log., 82, No. 2, 271-291 (2006).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Chagrov, “Undecidable properties of provability logic,” Algebra Logika, 29, No. 5, 350-367 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chagrov and M. Zakharyaschev, Modal Logics, Oxford Log. Stud., 35, Clarendon, Oxford (1997).

  12. A. I. Mal’tsev, Algebraic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Maksimova, “Restricted interpolation in modal logics,” in Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 4, King’s Coll. Publ., London (2003), pp. 297-311.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hallden, “On the semantic non-completeness of certain Lewis calculi,” J. Symb. Log., 16, 127-129 (1951).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Komori, “Logics without Craig’s interpolation property,” Proc. Jap. Acad., Ser. A, 54, 46-48 (1978).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Kreisel, “Explicit definability in intuitionistic logic,” J. Symb. Log., 25, No. 4, 389-390 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Maksimova, “Interpolation and joint consistency,” in We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of D. Gabbay, Vol. 2, King’s Coll. Publ., London (2005), pp. 293-305.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. L. Maksimova, “Modal logics and varieties of modal algebras: Beth properties, interpolation, and amalgamation,” Algebra Logika, 31, No. 2, 145-166 (1992).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. L. L. Maksimova, “An analog for the Beth theorem in normal extensions of modal logic K4,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 33, No. 6, 118-130 (1992).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Czelakowski, “Logical matrices and the amalgamation property,” Stud. Log., 41, No. 4, 329-341 (1982).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. L. L. Maksimova, “Intuitionistic logic and implicit definability,” Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 105, Nos. 1-3, 83-102 (2000).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. L. L. Maksimova, “Restricted interpolation and the projective Beth property in equational logic,” Algebra Logika, 42, No. 6, 712-726 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Henkin, J. D. Monk, and A. Tarski, Cylindric Algebras, Part II, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985).

  24. L. L. Maksimova, “Projective Beth properties in modal and superintuitionistic logics,” Algebra Logika, 38, No. 3, 316-333 (1999).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Ono, “Interpolation and the Robinson property for logics not closed under the Boolean operations,” Alg. Univ., 23, No. 2, 111-122 (1986).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Czelakowski and D. Pigozzi, “Amalgamation and interpolation in abstract algebraic logic,” in Models, Algebras and Proofs, Sel. Papers X Latin Am. Symp. Math. Log., Lect. Not. Pure Appl. Math., 23, Marcel Dekker, New York (1999), pp. 187-265.

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Sain, “Beth’s and Craig’s properties via epimorphisms and amalgamation in algebraic logic,” in Algebraic Logic and Universal Algebra in Computer Science, Lect. Notes Comp. Sci., 425, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990), pp. 209-226.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Hoogland, “Definability and interpolation. Model-theoretic investigations,” ILLC Diss. Ser., DS-2001-05, Amsterdam (2001).

  29. L. L. Maksimova, “A weak form of interpolation in equational logic,” Algebra Logika, 47, No. 1, 94-107 (2008).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Maksimova, “On variable separation in modal and superintuitionistic logics,” Stud. Log., 55, No. 1, 99-112 (1995).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Wronski, “Remarks on Hallden-completeness of modal and intermediate logics,” Bull. Sect. Log., 5, No. 4, 126-129 (1976).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. W. Rautenberg, Klassische und Nicht-Klassische Aussagenlogik, Vieweg, Braunschweig (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. Rautenberg, “Splitting lattices of logics,” Arch. Math. Log. Grundl., 20, 155-159 (1980).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. B. Jonsson, “Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive,” Math. Scand., 21, 110-121 (1967).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. L. L. Maksimova, “Interpolation and definability in extensions of the minimal logic,” Algebra Logika, 44, No. 6, 726-750 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. V. A. Yankov, “The relationship between deducibility in the intuitionistic propositional calculus and finite implicational structures,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 151, No. 6, 1293-1294 (1963).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. H. Ono, “Substructural logics and residuated lattices—An introduction,” in Trends Log. Stud. Log. Libr., 21, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003), pp. 193-228.

    Google Scholar 

  38. L. Maksimova, “Interrelation of algebraic, semantical and logical properties for superintuitionistic and modal logics,” in Logic, Algebra, and Computer Science, Banach Cent. Publ., 46, Polish Acad. Sci., Inst. Math., Warszawa (1999), pp. 159-168.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. L. Maksimova.

Additional information

Supported by RFBR (project No. 09-01-00090a), by the Grants Council (under RF President) for State Aid of Leading Scientific Schools (grant NSh-335.2008.1), and by the Russian Ministry of Education through the Analytical Departmental Target Program (ADTP) “Development of Scientific Potential of the Higher School of Learning” (project No. 2.1.1.419).

Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 754-792, November-December, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maksimova, L.L. Decidability of the interpolation problem and of related properties in tabular logics. Algebra Logic 48, 426–448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-009-9070-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-009-9070-0

Keywords

Navigation