Skip to main content
Log in

On the Wildness of Cambrian Lattices

  • Published:
Algebras and Representation Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this note, we investigate the representation type of the cambrian lattices and some other related lattices. The result is expressed as a very simple trichotomy. When the rank of the underlined Coxeter group is at most 2, the lattices are of finite representation type. When the Coxeter group is a reducible group of type \({\mathbb {A}_{1}^{3}}\), the lattices are of tame representation type. In all the other cases they are of wild representation type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong, D.: Generalized noncrossing partitions and combinatorics of Coxeter groups. Mem. Amer. Math Soc. 202(949), x + 159 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baryshnikov, Y.: New developments in singularity theory (Cambridge, 2000), volume 21 of NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem., pp 65–86. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht (2001)

  3. Borceux, F.: Handbook of categorical algebra. 1, volume 50 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaptal, N: Objets indécomposables dans certaines catégories de foncteurs. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 268, A934—A936 (1969)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapoton, F.: Stokes posets and serpent nests. DMTCS 18(3), 1–16 (2016). arXiv:1505.05990

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Drozd, Y.: Tame and wild matrix problems. In: Representation theory, II (Proc. Second Internat. Conf., Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ont., 1979), volume 832 of Lecture Notes in Math., pp. 242–258. Springer, Berlin-New York (1980)

  7. Garver, A., McConville, T.: Oriented flip graphs and noncrossing tree partitions. ArXiv e-prints (2016)

  8. Happel, D., Zacharia, D.: Homological properties of piecewise hereditary algebras. J. Algebra 323(4), 1139–1154 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleiner, M.: Partially ordered sets of finite type. Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 28, 32–41 (1972)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ladkani, S.: Universal derived equivalences of posets. ArXiv e-prints (2007)

  11. Ladkani, S: Universal derived equivalences of posets of cluster tilting objects. ArXiv e-prints (2007)

  12. Ladkani, S.: Which canonical algebras are derived equivalent to incidence algebras of posets? . Comm. Algebra 36(12), 4599–4606 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenzing, H., Meltzer, H.: Sheaves on a weighted projective line of genus one and representations of a tubular algebra. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Representations of Algebras (Ottawa, ON, 1992), volume 14 of Carleton-Ottawa Math. Lecture Note Ser., p. 25. Carleton Univ., Ottawa (1992)

  14. Lenzing, H.: Coxeter transformations associated with finite-dimensional algebras. In: Computational methods for representations of groups and algebras (Essen, 1997), volume 173 of Progr. Math. Birkhäuser, Basel (1999)

  15. Leszczyński, Z.: The completely separating incidence algebras of tame representation type. Colloq. Math. 94(2), 243–262 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Leszczyński, Z.: Representation-tame incidence algebras of finite posets. Colloq. Math. 96(2), 293–305 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Loupias, M.: Indecomposable representations of finite ordered sets. In: Representations of algebras (Proc. Internat. Conf., Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ont., 1974), pp. 201–209. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 488. Springer, Berlin (1975)

  18. Loupias, M.: Représentations indécomposables des ensembles ordonnés finis. In: Séminaire d’Algèbre Non Commutative (année 1974/75), Exp. No. 7, pp. 15 pp. Publ. Math. Orsay, No. 154–7543. Univ. Paris XI, Orsay (1975)

  19. Nazarova, L. A.: Partially ordered sets of infinite type. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 39(5), 963–991 (1975)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Reading, N: Cambrian lattices. Adv. Math. 205(2), 313–353 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Reading, N.: Sortable elements and Cambrian lattices. Algebra Universalis 56 (3-4), 411–437 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rickard, J.: Why is the A 6 preprojective algebra of wild representation type? mathoverflow.net, Question 202259 (2015)

  23. Simson, D.: Linear representations of partially ordered sets and vector space categories, volume 4 of Algebra, Logic and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Montreux (1992)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baptiste Rognerud.

Additional information

Presented by: Yuri Drozd

Le premier auteur abénéficié d’une aide de l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche (projet Carma, référence ANR-12-BS01-0017).

Le second auteur a bénéficié d’un financement de l’IDEX BMM/PN/AM/N 2016-096c.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapoton, F., Rognerud, B. On the Wildness of Cambrian Lattices. Algebr Represent Theor 22, 603–614 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9789-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9789-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation