Advertisement

American Journal of Dance Therapy

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 334–357 | Cite as

Dance/Movement Therapy: Learning to Look Through Video Microanalysis

  • Rebecca Houghton
  • Beatrice Beebe
Article

Abstract

This study examines the movement behavior of a therapist and her client during one dance/movement therapy (DMT) session, through the lens of mother-infant face-to-face communication research conducted with video microanalysis. Dance/movement therapy and mother-infant interaction research have in common a focus on the details of movement patterns and how these patterns are coordinated between two people. Microanalysis of movement patterns operates as a “social microscope,” revealing aspects of a subterranean world of communication within the dyad, which are too rapid for the naked eye to grasp in real time. We present a microanalysis of the movement patterns of the first 80 s of a DMT session conducted by the first author with an adolescent diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Our goal was to describe moments of coordination and patterns of disruption and repair that were not visible in the video when played in real time. We present drawings based on the video microanalysis to illustrate two clinically meaningful moments in the first 80 s of the session. Through this detailed description and the drawings, we illustrate: (a) how the therapist in training understood more about her own process of learning to become a dance/movement therapist; (b) what microanalysis of a very short segment of time can reveal about this specific dyad; (c) how microanalysis may be useful to the DMT profession.

Keywords

Autism Dance/movement therapy Mother-infant research Video microanalysis Training dance/movement therapists 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank JT Yost for the illustrations, and Kristen Kim and Andrea Tocci for assistance with the manuscript and drawings. Rebecca Houghton thanks Julie Miller and Christina Devereaux. Beatrice Beebe thanks the Bernard and Esther Besner Infant Research Fund.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartenieff, I., & Lewis, D. (1980). Body movement; coping with the environment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe, B. (1982). Micro-timing in mother-infant communication. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Nonverbal communication today. Joshua Fishman, Ed. Contributions to the sociology of language. (Vol. 33, pp. 169–195). New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
  4. Beebe, B. (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother-infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60, 7–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beebe, B. (2014). My journey in infant research and psychoanalysis: Microanalysis, a social microscope. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(1), 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., Blatt, S., … Andrews, H. (2007). Six-week postpartum maternal self-criticism and dependency and 4-month mother-infant self- and interactive contingency. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1360–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., Feldstein, S., & Andrews, H. (2008). Six-week postpartum maternal depressive symptoms and 4-month mother–infant self- and interactive contingency. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29, 442–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., & Lachmann, F. (1992). A dyadic systems view of communication. In N. Skolnick & S. Warshaw (Eds.), Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 61–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Markese, S., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Feldstein, S. (2010). The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother–infant interaction. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 3–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1994). Representation and internalization in infancy: Three principles of salience. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 11, 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Beebe, B., Messinger, D., Bahrick, L. E., Margolis, A., Buck, K. A., & Chen, H. (2016). A systems view of mother–infant face-to-face communication. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 556–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beebe, B., & Stern, D. (1977). Engagement-disengagement and early object experiences. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures (pp. 35–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beebe, B., Stern, D., & Jaffe, J. (1979). The kinesic rhythm of mother-infant interactions. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Of speech and time: Temporal speech patterns in interpersonal contexts (pp. 23–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Bromberg, Y., Herbst-Paparne, R., Sossin, K. M., Beebe, B., & Ward, A. W. (2016, April). Maternal dependency and self-criticism embodied in infant sequential shape flow facial patterns. Poster, Division 39, American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  16. Chace, M. (1945). Rhythm in movement as used in St. Elizabeth’s Hospital. In J. L. Moreno (Ed.), Group psychotherapy, a symposium (pp. 243–245.) New York: Beacon HouseGoogle Scholar
  17. Chace, M. (1953). Use of dance action in a group setting. Los Angeles, CA: Paper presented at the American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  18. Cohn, J., & Beebe, B. (1990). Sampling interval affects time-series regression estimates of mother-infant influence. Infant Behavior and Development, Abstracts Issue, 13, 317.Google Scholar
  19. Cohn, J., Campbell, S., & Ross, S. (1991). Infant response in the still-face paradigm at 6 months predicts avoidant and secure attachments at 12 months. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohn, J., & Tronick, E. (1989). Specificity of infant’s response to mother’s affective behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(2), 242–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dosamentes-Alperson, E. (1974). Carrying experiencing forward through authentic body movement. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 3(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dosamentes-Alperson, E., & Merrill, N. (1980). Growth effects of experiential movement psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 17, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Espenak, L. (1981). Dance therapy: Theory and application. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  24. Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (1998). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–273). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C., & Jasnow, M. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66(2), 1–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kestenberg Amighi, J., Loman, S., Lewis, P., & Sossin, M. (1999). The meaning of movement, developmental and clinical perspectives of the Kestenberg movement profile. New York: Brunner Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Kronen, J. (1982). Maternal facial mirroring at four months. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(4B), 1237–1238.Google Scholar
  29. Laban, R. (1956). Principles of dance and movement notation. London: MacDonald & Evans.Google Scholar
  30. Levy, F. J. (1992). Dance/movement therapy: A healing art (Rev ed.). Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Dance.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis, P. (1990). The Kestenberg Movement Profile in the psychotherapeutic process with borderline disorders. In P. Lewis & S. Loman (Eds.), The Kestenberg Movement Profile: Its past, present applications, and future directions. Antioch New England Graduate School: Keene, NH.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, P., & Avstreih, A. (1984). Object relations and self- psychology within psychoanalytic and Jungian dance-movement therapy. In P. Lewis (Ed.), Theoretical approaches in dance-movement therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 35–55). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, P. & Loman, S. (1992). Movement components of affect: Tension flow attributes within the Kestenberg Movement Profile (KMP). American Dance Therapy Association 27th Annual Conference Proceedings. Columbia, MD: American Dance Therapy Association.Google Scholar
  34. Loman, S., & Merman, H. (1996). The KMP: A tool for dance/movement therapy. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 18(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malatesta, C., & Haviland, J. (1982). Learning display rules: The socialization of emotion expression in infancy. Child Development, 53, 991–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McGarry, L. M., & Russo, F. A. (2011). Mirroring in dance/movement therapy: Potential mechanisms behind empathy. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, G., Cohn, J., & Campbell, S. (1997). Mother’s affective behavior with infant siblings: Stability and change. Developmental Psychology, 33, 856–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Reale, A., Sossin, M., Beebe, B., Ward, A., & Endres, L. (2012). Maternal facial “growing and shrinking” patterns relate to maternal self-criticism and dependency in a mother-infant microanalysis. Poster, 13th World Congress of the World Association for Infant Mental Health, Cape Town, South Africa, April 17–21.Google Scholar
  41. Sander, L. (1977). The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language (pp. 133–156). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Schoop, T. (1974). Won’t you join the dance?. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Smallwood, J. (1978). Dance therapy and the transcendent function. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 2(1), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sossin, K. M. (2002). Interactive movement patterns as ports of entry in infant-parent psychotherapy: Ways of seeing nonverbal behavior. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 97–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stern, D. (1971). A microanalysis of the mother-infant interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 10, 501–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Stern, D. (1995). The motherhood constellation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Tortora, S. (2006). The dancing dialogue: Using the communicative power of movement with young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Tortora, S. (2011). The need to be seen: From Winnicott to the mirror neuron system, dance/movement therapy comes of age. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 33, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analyses of infant communicative. In H. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 227–270). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginnings of human communication. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tronick, E. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44, 112–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social emotional development of infants and young children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  55. Tronick, E., & Cohn, J. (1989). Infant-mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development, 60(1), 85–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tronick, E., & Gianiano, A. (1986). Interactive mismatch and repair: Challenges to the coping infant. Zero to Three, 6(3), 1–6.Google Scholar
  57. Weinberg, K., & Tronick, E. (1991). Stability of infant social and coping behaviors and affective displays between 6 and 15 months: Age-appropriate tasks and stress bring out stability. Seattle, Washington: Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
  58. Zelner, S., Beebe, B., Jaffe, J. (1982, April). The organization of vocalization and gaze in early mother-infant interactive regulation. International Conference Infant Studies, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Dance Therapy Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Registered Dance/Movement TherapistPortlandUSA
  2. 2.New York State Psychiatric Institute #108, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations