Resilience in Community: A Social Ecological Development Model for Young Adult Sexual Minority Women
Family support and rejection are associated with health outcomes among sexual minority women (SMW). We examined a social ecological development model among young adult SMW, testing whether identity risk factors or outness to family interacted with family rejection to predict community connectedness and collective self-esteem. Lesbian and bisexual women (N = 843; 57 % bisexual) between the ages of 18–25 (M = 21.4; SD = 2.1) completed baseline and 12-month online surveys. The sample identified as White (54.2 %), multiple racial backgrounds (16.6 %), African American (9.6 %) and Asian/Asian American (3.1 %); 10.2 % endorsed a Hispanic/Latina ethnicity. Rejection ranged from 18 to 41 % across family relationships. Longitudinal regression indicated that when outness to family increased, SMW in highly rejecting families demonstrated resilience by finding connections and esteem in sexual minority communities to a greater extent than did non-rejected peers. But, when stigma concerns, concealment motivation, and other identity risk factors increased over the year, high family rejection did not impact community connectedness and SMW reported lower collective self-esteem. Racial minority SMW reported lower community connectedness, but not lower collective self-esteem. Families likely buffer or exacerbate societal risks for ill health. Findings highlight the protective role of LGBTQ communities and normative resilience among SMW and their families.
KeywordsLesbian Bisexual Women Young Adult Family Resilience
This work was supported by Grant R01 AA018292 (PI: Kaysen). Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Institute Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism under award number T32 AA007455 and National Institute of Mental Health under award number T32 MH082709. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lindsey Zimmerman, firstname.lastname@example.org, National Center for PTSD, Dissemination and Training Division, 795 Willow Rd. Bldg. 334 (NC-PTSD), B-270, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
- Balsam, K. F., Beadnell, B., & Molina, Y. (2012). The Daily Heterosexist Experiences Questionnaire: Measuring minority stress among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46(1), 3–25. doi: 10.1177/0748175612449743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- DeHaan, S., Kuper, L. E., Magee, J. C., Bigelow, L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013). The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: A mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 421–434. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.661489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kertzner, R. M., Meyer, I. H., Frost, D. M., & Stirratt, M. J. (2009). Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: the effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(4), 500–510. doi: 10.1037/aoO16&18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Legate, N., Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2012). Is coming out always a “good thing?” exploring the relations of autonomy support, outness, and wellness for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 145–152. doi: 10.1177/1948550611411929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 740-795). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mohr, J., & Fassinger, R. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 66–90.Google Scholar
- Moradi, B., Wiseman, M. C., DeBlaere, C., Goodman, M. B., Sarkees, A., Brewster, M. E., & Huang, Y. P. (2010). LGB of color and white individuals’ perceptions of heterosexist stigma, internalized homophobia, and outness: Comparisons of levels and links. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(3), 397–424. doi: 10.1177/0011000009335263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., & Hunter, J. (2004). Ethnic/racial differences in the coming-out process of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: A comparison of sexual identity development over time. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10(3), 215–228. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.10.3.215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., & Hunter, J. (2011). Different patterns of sexual identity development over time: Implications for the psychological adjustment of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Sex Research, 48(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1080/00224490903331067.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryan, C. (2009). Supportive families, healthy children: Helping families with lesbian, gay, bisexual & transgender children. San Francisco, CA: Family Acceptance Project, Marian Wright Edelman Institute, San Francisco State University.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). A practitioner’s resource guide: Helping families to support their LGBT children. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar