Moving Knowledge into Action: Developing the Rapid Synthesis and Translation Process Within the Interactive Systems Framework
- 701 Downloads
The Interactive Systems Framework (ISF) for Dissemination and Implementation presents an overall framework for translating knowledge into action. Each of its three systems requires further clarification and explanation to truly understand how to conduct this work. This article describes the development and initial application of the Rapid Synthesis and Translation Process (RSTP) using the exchange model of knowledge transfer in the context of one of the ISF systems: the Prevention Synthesis and Translation System (see [special issue “introduction” article] for a translation of the Wandersman et al. (Am J Community Psychol 41:3–4, 2008) article using the RSTP). This six-step process, which was developed by and for the Division of Violence Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in collaboration with partners, serves as an example of how a federal agency can expedite the transfer of research knowledge to practitioners to prevent violence. While the RSTP itself represents one of the possible functions in the Prevention Synthesis and Translation System, the resulting products affect both prevention support and prevention delivery as well. Examples of how practitioner and researcher feedback were incorporated into the Rapid Synthesis and Translation Process are discussed.
KeywordsSynthesis Translation Dissemination Implementation Violence
Rapid Synthesis and Translation Process
Interactive Systems Framework
Prevention Synthesis and Translation System
Prevention Delivery System
Prevention Support System
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Division of Violence Prevention
Rape Prevention Education
- Backer, T. E., David, S. L., & Soucy, G. (1995). Introduction. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (Vol. 155, pp. 147–168). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
- Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Yearbook of medical informatics: Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, N., Wethington, H., Kettel Khan, L., Grunbaum, J. A., Robin, L., Pitt Barnes, S., et al. (2010). Applying the systematic screening and assessment method to childhood obesity prevention. New Directions for Evaluation, 2010(125), 33–49.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 1055–1071.Google Scholar
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC Injury Research Agenda, 2009–2018. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc.
- Reardon, R., Lavis, J., & Gibson, J. (2006). From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide. Toronto, ON: Institute for Work and Health.Google Scholar
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2009). The synthesis project. Retrieved from http://rwjf.org/pr/synthesisabout.jsp.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar