American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 51, Issue 1–2, pp 123–139 | Cite as

Sense of Community and Informal Social Control Among Lower Income Households: The Role of Homeownership and Collective Efficacy in Reducing Subjective Neighborhood Crime and Disorder

  • Mark R. LindbladEmail author
  • Kim R. Manturuk
  • Roberto G. Quercia
Original paper


We examine the link between homeownership, collective efficacy, and subjective neighborhood crime and disorder. Although prior research suggests that homeownership provides social benefits, the housing downturn and foreclosure crisis, coupled with mounting evidence that people self-select into housing, raise questions about the role of homeownership. We adjust for respondents’ decision to own or rent using a nationwide sample of lower-income households. We account for demographic and neighborhood characteristics as well as ratings of individual efficacy. We present a structural equation model that identifies how sense of community and informal social control jointly contribute to collective efficacy. The latent collective efficacy construct mediates the impact of homeownership on resident’s perceptions of neighborhood disorder. Such perceptions matter because they have been linked to resident’s physical and mental health. Our findings demonstrate that when coupled with sustainable mortgages, homeownership exerts a robust yet indirect effect in reducing subjective neighborhood crime and disorder. Our model also links collective efficacy to neighborhood racial homogeneity, a finding which presents challenges for the study of diversity and community. We discuss sense of community research as well as sustainable mortgages and implications of the foreclosure crisis for the future of homeownership opportunities among lower income households and neighborhoods.


Housing Mortgages Crime prevention Community development Asset building Neighborhood homogeneity and diversity 



Funding for this study was provided by the Ford Foundation. Survey data was collected by RTI International. We thank Seb Prohn, Catherine Zimmer, Ling Wang, Sarah Riley, Tianji Cai, Jasperlynn Kao, and other researchers at the UNC Center for Community Capital for consultation and assistance. We also thank anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.


  1. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellair, P. E., & Browning, C. R. (2010). Contemporary disorganization research: An assessment and further test of the systemic model of neighborhood crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(4), 496–521. doi: 10.1177/0022427810375578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, X. S. (2008). On half-blind men and elephants: Understanding greater ethnic diversity and responding to “good-enough” evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brisson, D., & Altschul, I. (2011). Collective efficacy predicting experience of material hardship in low-income neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 47(4), 541–563. doi: 10.1177/1078087411400043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodsky, A. E., O'Campo, P. J., & Aronson, R. E. (1999). PSOC in community context: Multi-level correlates of a measure of psychological sense of community in low-income, urban neighborhoods. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 659–679.Google Scholar
  8. Cantillon, D. (2006). Community social organization, parents, and peers as mediators of perceived neighborhood block characteristics on delinquent and prosocial activities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37(1–2), 111–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantillon, D., Davidson, W. S., & Schweitzer, J. H. (2003). Measuring community social organization: Sense of community as a mediator in social disorganization theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(4), 321–339. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(03)00026-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, J. H., & Mulcahy, M. (2010). Twenty years of housing policy: what’s new, what’s changed, what’s ahead? Housing Policy Debate, 20(4), 551–576. doi: 10(1080/10511482).2010.51098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J. H., McMillan, D. W., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswik’s lens: A first look. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox, K. R. (1982). Housing tenure and neighborhood activism. Urban Affairs Review, 18(1), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1989). Sense of community and political participation. Journal of community psychology, 17(2), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1993). Psychological sense of community and support for public school taxes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz, R. D., & Haurin, D. R. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(3), 401–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ding, L., Quercia, R. G., Li, W., & Ratcliffe, J. (2011). Risky borrowers or risky mortgages: Disaggregating effects using propensity score models. Journal of Real Estate Research, 33(2), 245–277.Google Scholar
  17. DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. (1998). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowner’s better citizens?. Mass., USA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunham, H. W. (1986). The community today—place or process—commentary. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engelhardt, G. V., Eriksen, M. D., Gale, W. G., & Mills, G. B. (2010). What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D. (2004). Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well-being? Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
  21. Green, R. K., & White, M. J. (1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(3), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guest, A. M., & Oropesa, R. S. (1986). Informal social ties and political activity in the metropolis. Urban Affairs Review, 21(4), 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. (2009). Propensity score analysis. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbert, C. E., & Belsky, E. S. (2008). The homeownership experience of low-income and minority households: A review and synthesis of the literature. Cityscape, 10(2), 5–60.Google Scholar
  26. Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D. (2007). Community social and place predictors of sense of community: a multilevel and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(5), 563–581. doi: 10.1002/Jcop.20165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lyons, W. E., & Lowery, D. (1989). Citizen responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: A partial test of a general model. The Journal of Politics, 51(04), 841–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manturuk, K., Lindblad, M., & Quercia, R. (2009). Homeownership and Local Voting in Disadvantaged Urban Neighborhoods. CityScape, 11(3).Google Scholar
  29. Manturuk, K., Lindblad, M., & Quercia, R. (2010). Friends and neighbors: Homeownership and social capital among low- to moderate-income families. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 471–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00494.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community psychology, 14(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, N. A., Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Armstead, T. L., Schneider, J. E., & Sheffer, M. A. (2008). Community organizations and sense of community: Further development in theory and measurement. Journal of community psychology, 36(6), 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prezza, M., Amici, M., Roberti, T., & Tedeschi, G. (2001). Sense of community referred to the whole town: Its relations with neighboring, loneliness, life satisfaction, and area of residence. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 29–52.Google Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quercia, R. G., Freeman, A., & Ratcliffe, J. (2011). Regaining the dream: How to renew the promise of homeownership for America’s working families. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  35. Riley, S. F., Ru, H., Lindblad, M. R., & Quercia, R. G. (2010). The community advantage program survey: Data collection update and analysis of panel attrition. Retrieved from
  36. Riley, S. F., Ru, H., & Quercia, R. G. (2009). The community advantage program database: Overview and comparison with the current population survey. Cityscape, 11(3), 247–256.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, D., & Wilkinson, D. (1995). Sense of community in a remote mining town: Validating a Neighborhood Cohesion scale, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 137–148. doi: 10.1007/BF02506926.Google Scholar
  38. Rohe, W., Shannon Van Zandt, & George McCarthy. (2000). The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research. Research Institute for Housing American Report.Google Scholar
  39. Rohe, W. M., & Stegman, M. A. (1994). The impact of home ownership on the social and political involvement of low-income people. Urban Affairs Review, 30(1), 152–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rohe, W. M., Van Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Social benefits and costs of homeownership. Low-income homeownership: Examining the unexamined goal, pp. 381–406.Google Scholar
  41. Ross, C. E. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(2), 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(3), 258–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Pribesh, S. (2001). Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 568–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rossi, P. H., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from National Surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rotolo, T. (2000). Town heterogeneity and affiliation: A multilevel analysis of voluntary association membership. Sociological Perspectives, 43(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saegert, S., Fields, D., & Libman, K. (2009). Deflating the dream: Radical risk and the neoliberalization of homeownership. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community; prospects for a community psychology (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Shlay, A. B. (2006). Low-income homeownership: American dream or delusion? Urban Studies, 43(3), 511–531. doi: 10.1080/00420980500452433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  52. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2010). Report to Congress on the Root Causes of the Foreclosure Crisis (pp. 1–64).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark R. Lindblad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kim R. Manturuk
    • 1
  • Roberto G. Quercia
    • 1
  1. 1.UNC Center for Community CapitalUniversity of North Carolina–Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations