Abstract
The influence of match length and re-matching on the effectiveness of school-based mentoring was studied in the context of a national, randomized study of 1,139 youth in Big Brothers Big Sisters programs. The sample included youth in grades four through nine from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. At the end of the year, youth in intact relationships showed significant academic improvement, while youth in matches that terminated prematurely showed no impact. Those who were re-matched after terminations showed negative impacts. Youth, mentor, and program characteristics associated with having an intact match were examined. Youth with high levels of baseline stress and those matched with college student mentors were likely to be in matches that terminated prematurely, while rejection-sensitive youth and mentors who had previous mentoring experience were more likely to be in intact relationships. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkins, L. C. (2010). Testing parameter significance in instrumental variables probit estimators: Some simulation results. Unpublished manuscript.
Angrist, J., Imbens, G., & Rubin, D. (1996). Identification of causal effects with instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.
Bernstein, L., Rappaport, C., Olsho, L., Hunt, D., & Levin, M. (2009). Impact evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education’s Student Mentoring Program. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Bostic, J. Q., Shadid, L. G., & Blotcky, M. J. (1996). Our time is up: Forced terminations during psychotherapy training. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 50, 347–359.
Coie, J., & Dodge, K. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815–829.
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. (1996). The implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.
Downey, G., Feldman, S., Khuri, J., & Friedman, S. (1994). Maltreatment and child depression. In W. M. Reynolds & H. F. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 481–508). New York: Plenum.
Downey, G., Lebolt, A., Rincón, C., & Freitas, A. L. (1998). Rejection sensitivity and children’s interpersonal difficulties. Child Development, 69, 1074–1091.
Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15, 668–673.
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002a). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.
DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (2005). Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., Parra, G. R., & Pugh-Lilly, A. O. (2002b). Testing a new model of mentoring. In J. E. Rhodes (Ed.), New directions for youth development: A critical view of youth mentoring (pp. 21–57). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
DuBois, D. L., & Rhodes, J. E. (2006). Youth mentoring: Bridging science with practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 547–565.
Egeland, B., Jacobvitz, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (1988). Breaking the cycle of abuse: Relationship predictors. Child Development, 59, 1080–1088.
Gennetian, L., Morris, P., Bos, J., & Bloom, H. (2005). Constructing instrumental variables from experimental data to explore how treatment produces effects. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Learning more from experiments: Evolving analytic approaches (pp. 75–114). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Grossman, J. B., & Johnson, A. (1999). Assessing the effectiveness of mentoring programs. In J. B. Grossman (Ed.), Contemporary issues in mentoring (pp. 25–47). Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199–206.
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.
Hayes, A. M., Castonguay, L. G., & Goldfried, M. R. (1996). Effectiveness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 623–627.
Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., Feldman, A. F., McMaken, J., & Jucovy, L. Z. (2007). Making a difference in schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring. Child Development, 82, 346–361.
Herrera, C., Sipe, C. L., & McClanahan, W. S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Reasoning, 11, 213–218.
Iwata, S. (2001). Recentered and rescaled instrumental variable estimation of tobit and probit models with errors in variables. Econometric Reviews, 24, 319–335.
Karcher, M. J. (2005). The effects of school-based developmental mentoring and mentors’ attendance on mentees’ self-esteem, behavior, and connectedness. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 65–77.
Karcher, M. J. (2008). The study of mentoring in the learning environment (SMILE): A randomized study of the effectiveness of school-based mentoring. Prevention Science, 9, 99–113.
Karcher, M. J., Davidson, A. J., Rhodes, J. E., & Herrera, C. (2010). Pygmalion in the program: The role of teenage peer mentors’ attitudes in shaping their mentees’ outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, 14, 212–227.
Keller, T. E. (2005). The stages and development of mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 82–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Larose, S., Bernier, A., & Soucy, N. (2005). Attachment as a moderator of the effect of security in mentoring on subsequent perceptions of mentoring and relationship quality with college teachers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 399–415.
Larson, R., Hansen, D., & Walker, K. (2005). Everybody’s gotta give: Adolescents’ development of initiative within a youth program. In J. Mahoney, R. Larson, & J. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lerner, R. M., & Galambos, N. L. (1998). Adolescent development: Challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 413–446.
London, B., Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Paltin, I. (2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 481–506.
McDowell, D. J., Kim, M., O’Neil, R., & Parke, R. D. (2002). Children’s emotional regulation and social competence in middle childhood: The role of maternal and paternal interactive style. Marriage & Family Review, 34, 345–364.
MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2006). Mentoring in America 2005: A snapshot of the current state of mentoring. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Morrow, K. V., & Styles, M. B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brother Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Pierce, K. M., Hamm, J. V., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). Experiences in after-school programs and children’s adjustment in first-grade classrooms. Child Development, 70, 756–767.
Pryce, J. M. (2006). Up-close and personal: A view of school-based mentoring relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Ragins, B. R., & Scandura, T. A. (1997). The way we were: Gender and the termination of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 945–953.
Rhodes, J. E., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Mentoring relationships and programs for youth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 254–258.
Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, A. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71, 1662–1671.
Rhodes, J. E., Liang, B., & Spencer, R. (2009). First do no harm: Ethical principles for youth mentoring relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 452–458.
Rhodes, J. E., Reddy, R., Roffman, J., & Grossman, J. B. (2005). Promoting successful youth mentoring relationships: A preliminary screening questionnaire. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 147–168.
Rhodes, J. E., & Spencer, R. (2005). Someone to watch over me: Mentoring programs in the after-school lives of youth. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 419–435). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119–148.
Schwartz, S., Rhodes, J., Chan, C. & Herrera, C. (in press). The impact of school-based mentoring on youth with different relational profiles. Developmental Psychology.
Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. The School Counselor, 40, 327–334.
Spencer, R. (2006). Understanding the mentoring process between adolescents and adults. Youth and Society, 37, 287–315.
Styles, M., & Morrow, K. (1992). Understanding how youth and elders form relationships: A study of four linking lifetimes programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Wheeler, M. E., Keller, T. E., & Dubois, D. L. (2010). Review of three recent randomized trials of school-based mentoring. Social Policy Report, 24, 1–27.
Williams, L., & Winter, H. (2009). Guidelines for an effective transfer of cases: The needs of the transfer triad. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 146–158.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Carla Herrera, Keoki Hansen, and the support of the William T. Grant Foundation and the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grossman, J.B., Chan, C.S., Schwartz, S.E.O. et al. The Test of Time in School-Based Mentoring: The Role of Relationship Duration and Re-Matching on Academic Outcomes. Am J Community Psychol 49, 43–54 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9435-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9435-0