American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 48, Issue 3–4, pp 395–411 | Cite as

Like a Fish Out of Water: Reconsidering Disaster Recovery and the Role of Place and Social Capital in Community Disaster Resilience

Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper we draw on the findings of a critical, multi-sited ethnographic study of two rural communities affected by a wildfire in British Columbia, Canada to examine the salience of place, identity, and social capital to the disaster recovery process and community disaster resilience. We argue that a reconfiguration of disaster recovery is required that more meaningfully considers the role of place in the disaster recovery process and opens up the space for a more reflective and intentional consideration of the disorientation and disruption associated with disasters and our organized response to that disorientation. We describe a social-psychological process, reorientation, in which affected individuals and communities navigate the psychological, social and emotional responses to the symbolic and material changes to social and geographic place that result from the fire’s destruction. The reorientation process emphasizes the critical importance of place not only as an orienting framework in recovery but also as the ground upon which social capital and community disaster resilience are built. This approach to understanding and responding to the disorientation of disasters has implications for community psychologists and other service providers engaged in supporting disaster survivors. This includes the need to consider the complex dynamic of contextual and cultural factors that influence the disaster recovery process.

Keywords

Social capital Disaster Trauma recovery Community disaster resilience Place Ethnography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Completion of this article was made possible in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Grant #41020040177 awarded to Bonita C. Long and the Michael Smith Health Research Foundation Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Fellowships awarded to Robin S. Cox.

References

  1. Bakker-Rabdau, C., & Bakker, M. (1973). No trespassing!: Explorations in human territoriality. London, UK: Coventure Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Banyard, V. L., & Miller, K. E. (1998). The powerful potential of qualitative research for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(4), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton, D. (1999). The threat to belonging in Enniskillen: Reflections on the Remembrance Day bombing. In E. S. Zinner & M. B. Williams (Eds.), When a community weeps: Case studies in group survivorship (pp. 191–211). Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of social capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B., & Perkins, D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Buttimer, A. (1980). Home, reach, and the sense of place. In A. Buttimer & D. Seamon (Eds.), The human experience of space and place (pp. 166–187). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Casey, E. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (1990). Discovering chronic illness: Using Grounded Theory. Social Science and Medicine, 30(11), 1161–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. (1999). Stories of suffering: Subjective tales and research narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 9(3), 362–382.Google Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (2001). Grounded theory in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 160–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Coburn, D. (2004). Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: Class, neoliberalism, and health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 41–56.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. Chichester, UK: Horwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cox, H. M., & Holmes, C. A. (2000). Loss, healing, and the power of place. Human Studies, 23(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox, R. S., Long, B. C., Jones, M. I., & Handler, R. J. (2008). Sequestering of suffering: Critical discourse analysis of natural disaster media coverage. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(4), 469–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. Sociological Quarterly, 34(1), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derose, K. P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Social capital and health care access. Medical Care Research and Review, 66(3), 272–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diaz, J., & Dayal, A. (2008). Sense of place: A model for community based psychosocial support programs. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 1, 1174–4707.Google Scholar
  22. DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 354–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. C. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edmondson, R. (2003). Social capital: A strategy for enhancing health? Social Science and Medicine, 57(9), 1723–1733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenstat, S. A., & Bancroft, L. (1999). Domestic violence. New England Journal of Emergency Medicine, 341(12), 886–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erickson, B. (2003). Social networks: The value of variety. Contexts, 2(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erikson, K. (1976a). Loss of community at Buffalo Creek. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133(3), 302–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Erikson, K. (1976b). Everything in its path. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  30. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. vanDijk (Ed.), Introduction to discourse analysis (pp. 258–284). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Fordham, M. H., & Ketteridge, A. M. (1998). “Men must work and women must weep:” Examining gender stereotypes in disasters. In E. Enarson & B. Morrow (Eds.), The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes (pp. 81–94). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition: People and policy in the metropolis. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Giroux, H. A. (2006). Reading Hurricane Katrina: Race, class, and the biopolitics of disposability. College Literature, 33(3), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Guiliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(3), 267–274.Google Scholar
  38. Gundry, L. K. (2005). Home as a locus of work and career. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 30(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Hanna, K. S., Dale, A., & Ling, C. (2009). Social capital and quality of place: Reflections on growth and change in a small town. Local Environment, 14(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harner, J. (2001). Place identity and copper mining in Sonora, Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 660–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hart, M., & Ben-Yoseph, M. (2005). Introduction: Shifting meanings of home. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 30, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Healy, K., Haynes, M., & Hampshire, A. (2007). Gender, social capital and location: Understanding the interactions. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(2), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2003). Intergroup behaviour and social identity. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 407–431). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Holman, E. A., & Cohen Silver, R. (1998). Getting “stuck” in the past: Temporal orientation and coping with trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1146–1163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huckin, T. (2002). Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness. Discourse and Society, 13(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (1993). A test of the support deterioration model in the context of a natural disaster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 395–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (1995). In search of altruistic community: Patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(4), 447–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (2004). Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: Altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. In R. J. Ursano, A. Norwood, & C. Fullerton (Eds.), Bioterrorism: Psychological and public health interventions (pp. 200–229). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
  51. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  52. Kleine, S. S., & Baker, S. M. (2004). An integrative review of material possession attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1–35. http://www.amsreview.org/articles/kleine01-2004.pdf.
  53. Koopman, C., Classen, C., & Spiegel, D. (1996). Dissociative responses in the immediate aftermath of the Oakland/Berkeley firestorm. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 521–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lang, R. (1979). The dwelling door: Towards a phenomenology of transition. In D. Seamon & R. Mugerauer (Eds.), Dwelling, place and environment: Towards a phenomenology of person and world (pp. 210–214). Dordrecht, NL: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leavell, V. (2007). The new Thai capitalism: Development or disaster? Retrieved on September 23, 2009 from http://www.clpmag.org/article.php?article=The-New-Thai-Capitalism-Development-or-Disaster_159.
  57. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In S. M. Low & I. Altman (Eds.), Place attachment: Human behavior and environment (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Martin, E. (1994). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  61. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  62. McFarlane, A. C., Clayer, J. R., & Bookless, C. L. (1997). Psychiatric morbidity following a natural disaster: An Australian bushfire. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32(5), 261–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Milligan, M. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction, 21(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., & Watson, P. J. (2002a). 60, 000 disaster victims speak: Part II. Summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 65, 240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002b). 60,000 Disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981–2001. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 65, 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Norris, F., Stevens, S., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K., & Pfefferbaum, R. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 1573–2770.Google Scholar
  69. Ofosuhene, M. (2005). Urban connections with rural areas in home-based business: Implications for sustainable rural development in Saskatchewan. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  70. Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Paasi, A. (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing ‘regional identity’. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on child social adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paton, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: Integrating individual, community, institutional, and environmental perspectives. In D. Paton & D. Johnston (Eds.), Disaster resilience: An integrated approach (pp. 305–318). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  74. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Sage University Papers Series on qualitative research methods (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Pidgeon, N. F., & Henwood, K. L. (1997). Using grounded theory in psychological research. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 245–273). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  76. Raphael, B., & Wilson, J. P. (1993). Theoretical and intervention considerations in working with victims of disasters. In J. Wilson & B. Raphael (Eds.), International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes (pp. 105–117). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placement. London, UK: Pion.Google Scholar
  78. Seamon, D. (1979). A geography of the lifeworld: Movement, rest and encounter. London, UK: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  79. Shotter, J. (2003). Real presences’: Meaning as living movement in a participatory world. Theory and Psychology, 13(4), 435–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Statistics Canada. (2001a). 2001 census of Canada: Community profiles. Retrieved on March 2, 2004 from http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/PlaceSearchForm1.cfm.
  81. Statistics Canada. (2001b). A profile of the Canadian population, where we live. Retrieved on March 2, 2004 from: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/PlaceSearchForm1.cfm.
  82. Statistics Canada. (2005). Social engagement and civic participation: Are rural and small town populations really at an advantage? Rural and Small Town Canada, 6, doi: http://www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/listpub.cgi?catno=21-006-XIE2005004.
  83. Stehlik, D., Lawrence, G., & Gray, I. (2000). Gender and drought: The experiences of Australian women in the drought of the 1990’s. Disasters, 24(1), 38–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stephens, C. (2007). Social capital in its place: Using social theory to understand social capital and inequalities in health. Social Science and Medicine, 66(5), 1174–1184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Stone, W., Gray, M., & Hughes, J. (2003). Social capital at work. Melbourne, AT: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  86. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Thompson-Nicola Regional District. (2003). A route to recovery: Report of the North Thompson Recovery Plan Task Force. Kamloops, BC: Thompson-Nicola Regional District.Google Scholar
  88. Turner, J., & Reynolds, K. (2003). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes (pp. 133–152). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  89. VanBreda, A. D. (2001). Resilience theory: A literature review. Gezina, SA: South African Military Health Service, Military Psychological Institute, Social Work and Research Development.Google Scholar
  90. Wakefield, S. E., & Poland, B. (2004). Family, friend, or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development. Social Science and Medicine, 60(12), 2819–2832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wellman, B., & Frank, K. (2001). Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from personal communities. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  92. Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  93. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social and Applied SciencesRoyal Roads UniversityVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Applied Research DivisionJustice Institute of British ColumbiaNew WestminsterCanada

Personalised recommendations