Advertisement

American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 46, Issue 1–2, pp 152–166 | Cite as

Participatory Action Research (PAR) in Middle School: Opportunities, Constraints, and Key Processes

  • Emily J. Ozer
  • Miranda L. Ritterman
  • Maggie G. Wanis
Original Paper

Abstract

Late childhood and early adolescence represent a critical transition in the developmental and academic trajectory of youth, a time in which there is an upsurge in academic disengagement and psychopathology. PAR projects that can promote youth’s sense of meaningful engagement in school and a sense of efficacy and mattering can be particularly powerful given the challenges of this developmental stage. In the present study, we draw on data from our own collaborative implementation of PAR projects in secondary schools to consider two central questions: (1) How do features of middle school settings and the developmental characteristics of the youth promote or inhibit the processes, outcomes, and sustainability of the PAR endeavor? and (2) How can the broad principles and concepts of PAR be effectively translated into specific intervention activities in schools, both within and outside of the classroom? In particular, we discuss a participatory research project conducted with 6th and 7th graders at an urban middle school as a means of highlighting the opportunities, constraints, and lessons learned in our efforts to contribute to the high-quality implementation and evaluation of PAR in diverse urban public schools.

Keywords

Participatory action research Middle school Children Adolescents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a William T. Grant Scholars’ Award to the first author, and by funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Center as part of the Center of Excellence for Youth Violence Prevention (Center for Culture, Immigration and Youth Violence Prevention at UC-Berkeley). The authors express appreciation to Thomas Cook, Tom Weisner, Meredith Minkler, Lawrence Green, and Marc Zimmerman for their consultation; Elizabeth Hubbard, Marieka Schotland, Sarah Jones, and Carmelo Sgarlato for collaboration with the research, and Jeremy Cantor and Jessica Camacho for their assistance in data collection.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Berg, M., Coman, E., & Schensul, J. J. (2009). Youth action research for prevention: A multi-level intervention designed to increase efficacy and empowerment among urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 345–359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(1), 31–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cahill, C., Rios-Moore, I., & Threatts, T. (2008). Open eyes-different eyes: PAR as a process of personal and social transformation. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. California Center for Civic Participation and Youth Development. (2004). Youth voices in community design. CA: Sacramento.Google Scholar
  5. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2007). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cargo, M., Grams, G., Ottoson, J., Ward, P., & Green, L. (2003). Empowerment as fostering positive youth development and citizenship. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Supplement 1), S66–S79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2004). Youth participation in evaluation and research as a way of lifting new voices. Children Youth and Environments, 14(2), 84–98.Google Scholar
  8. Checkoway, B., Dobbie, D., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2003). Youth participation in community evaluation research as an emerging social movement. Community Youth Development Journal, 4(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Compas, B. E., Oppedisano, G., Connor, J. K., Gerhardt, C. A., Hinden, B. R., Achenbaach, T. M., et al. (1997). Gender Differences in depressive symptoms in adolescence: Comparison of national samples of clinically-referred and non-referred youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 617–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Damon, W. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Buchanan, C., Wigfield, A., Reuman, D., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage/environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. (2003). Schools as developmental contexts In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 129–148). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Galaif, E. (2007). Suicidality, depression, and alcohol use among adolescents: A review of empirical findings. International journal of adolescent medicine and health, 19(1), 27–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. García Coll, C. T., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., McAdoo, H. P., Crnic, K., Wasik, B. H., et al. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ginwright, S., Noguera, P., & Cammarota, J. (Eds.). (2006). Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Granger, R. C. (2002). Creating the conditions linked to positive youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 95, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 455–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Helitzer, D., Yoon, S. J., Wallerstein, N., & Garcia-Velarde, L. D. (2000). The role of process evaluation in the training of facilitators for an adolescent health education program. Journal of School Health, 70(4), 141–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Holden, D. J., Crankshaw, E., Nimsch, C., Hinnant, L. W., & Hund, L. (2004). Quantifying the impact of participation in local tobacco control groups on the psychological empowerment of involved youth. Health Education & Behavior, 31(5), 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Israel, B., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 149–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., EA, P., Becker, A., Alllen, A., & Guzman, J. R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community based participatory research principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 53–76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Jennings, L., Parra-Medina, D., Hilfinger Messias, D., & McLoughlin, K. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 31–55.Google Scholar
  28. Kirshner, B. (2007). Supporting youth participation in school reform: Preliminary notes from a university-community partnership. Children Youth and Environments, 17(2), 354–363.Google Scholar
  29. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  30. Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Little, J. W., & McLaughlin, M. (1993). Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. London, J. (2001). Youth REP: Step by step: An introduction to youth-led evaluation and research. Oakland, CA: Youth in Focus.Google Scholar
  33. London, J., Zimmerman, K., & Erbstein, N. (2003). Youth-led research and evaluation: Tools for youth, organizational, and community development. New Directions in Evaluation, 98, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mediratta, K., Shah, S., McAlister, S., Fruchter, N., Mokhtar, C., & Lockwood, D. (2008). Organized communities, stronger schools: A preview of research findings. Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar
  37. Midgley, C., & Feldlaufer, H. (1987). Students’ and teachers’ decision-making fit before and after the transition to junior high school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7(2), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing student voice in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morrell, E. (2007). Six summers of YPAR: Learning, action, and change in urban education. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nieto, S. (1996). Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream. Harvard Education Review.Google Scholar
  42. Ozer, E. J., Cantor, J. P., Cruz, G. W., Fox, B., Hubbard, E., & Moret, L. (2008). The diffusion of youth-led participatory research in urban schools: The role of the prevention support system in implementation and sustainability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 278–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Haynes, N. J., Mintz, S., & La Paro, K. M. (2006). Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS) manual: Middle/secondary version pilot. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  44. Rappaport, J., Swift, C., & Hess, R. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  45. Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “the culture of the school and the problem of change”. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schensul, J. L., Berg, M. J., & Sydlo, S. (2004). Core elements of participatory action research for educational empowerment and risk prevention with urban youth. Practicing Anthropology, 26(2), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shor, I. (1996). When students have the power: Negotiating authority in critical pedagogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Simmons, R. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  49. Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spencer, M. B., Dupree, D., & Hartmann, T. (1997). A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST): A self-organization perspective in context. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 817833 Google Scholar
  51. Spencer, M. B., Fegley, S. G., & Harpalani, V. (2003). A theoretical and empirical examination of identity as coping: Linking coping resources to the self processes of African American youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suleiman, A., Soleimanpour, S., & London, J. (2006). Youth action for health through youth-led research. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1/2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sydlo, S. J., Schensul, J. J., Owens, D. C., Brase, M. K., Wiley, K. N., Berg, M. J., et al. (2000). Participatory action research curriculum for empowering youth. Hartford, CT: The Institute for Community Research.Google Scholar
  54. Trickett, E. J., & Todd, D. M. (1972). The high school culture: An ecological perspective. Theory into Practice, 11(1), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wallerstein, N., Sanchez, V., & Velarde, L. (2004). Freirian praxis in health education and community organizing: A case study of an adolescent prevention program. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing & community building for health (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 171–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 171–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Weinstein, R. S. (2002a). Overcoming inequality in schooling: A call to action for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 21–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Weinstein, R. S. (2002b). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: The youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Authors 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily J. Ozer
    • 1
  • Miranda L. Ritterman
    • 2
  • Maggie G. Wanis
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Community Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity of California at Berkeley School of Public HealthBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Division of EpidemiologyUniversity of California at Berkeley School of Public HealthBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations