American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 46, Issue 1–2, pp 115–123 | Cite as

Young Children as Protagonists and the Role of Participatory, Visual Methods in Engaging Multiple Perspectives

Original Paper


How can the perspectives, insights and interests of young children, under 6 years-old, be given status in processes of change? This paper will examine the contribution participatory and visual methods can make to enabling young children to document their experiences and to facilitate exchange with adults. Examples will be drawn from three research studies in educational settings which have developed a specific research method, the Mosaic approach (Clark and Moss 2001; Clark 2004; Clark 2005) which brings together visual and verbal research tools. This paper will discuss how researching with young children rather than on young children can redraw the boundaries between adults’ and children’s roles in the research process including the relationship with the research audience.


Participatory action research Visual research methods Young children 


  1. Burke, C. (2008). ‘Play in focus’: children’s visual voice in participative research. In P. Thomson (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 23–36). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Carr, M. (2000). Seeking children’s perspectives about their learning. In A. Smith, N. Taylor, & M. Gollop (Eds.), Children’s voices: Research, policy and practice (pp. 37–55). Auckland: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowledge, education and action research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the last first. London: Intermediate Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, P. (2004). Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representation. Children and Society, 18, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, P., & James, A. (Eds.). (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. (2004). The Mosaic approach and research with young children. In V. Lewis, M. Kellett, C. Robinson, S. Fraser, & S. Ding (Eds.), The Reality of research with children and young people (pp. 142–161). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. (2005). Ways of seeing: Using the Mosaic approach to listen to young children’s perspectives. In A. Clark, P. Moss, & A. Kjørholt (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 29–49). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (2007). Views from inside the shed: Young children’s perspectives of the outdoor environment. Education, 3–13, 35(4), 349–363.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. (2008). Early childhood spaces: Involving young children and practitioners in the design process. Working Paper 43. The Hague: Bernard van leer Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A. (2010). Transforming children’s spaces: Children’s and adults’ participation in designing learning environments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  14. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: the new tyranny?. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Einarrsdottir, J. (2005). Playschool in pictures: Children’s photographs as a research method. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 523–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emond, R. (2005). Ethnographic research methods with children and young people. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experiences: Approaches and methods (pp. 123–139). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fals-Borda, O. (2006). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition (pp. 27–37). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, M. (2007). A Brief history of the participatory action research collective. Participatory Action Research Collective. Retrieved from Jan 29 2009.
  19. Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2006). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition (pp. 71–82). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experience: Methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Harmon, K. (Ed.). (2004). You are here: Personal geographies and other maps of the imagination. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hart, R. (1997). Children’s participation. UNICEF and London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  23. Lambert, B., & Clyde, M. (2000). Rethinking early childhood theory and practice. Sydney: Social Science Press.Google Scholar
  24. Langsted, O. (1994). Looking at quality from the child’s perspective. In P. Moss & A. Pence (Eds.), Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality (pp. 28–42). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  25. Mandell, N. (1991). The least–adult role in studying children. In F. Waksler (Ed.), Studying the social worlds of children (pp. 38–60). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mayall, B. (2008). Conversations with children: working with generational issues. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 109–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Park, P. (2006). Knowledge and participatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition (pp. 83–93). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research: Concise, paperback edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? In C. Giudici & M. Krechevsky (Eds.), Making learning visible, Children as individual and group learners (pp. 78–89). Cambridge, MA: Project Zero and Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  30. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rogoff, B., Goodman Turkanis, C., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Adults and children in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thomson, P. (Ed.). (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Torbert, W. (2006). The practice of action inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition (pp. 207–218). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wells, G. (1986). The Meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Childhood, Development and LearningThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations