Skip to main content

Dilemmas of Practice: Challenges to Program Quality Encountered by Youth Program Leaders

Abstract

To create and sustain high quality youth development programs it is important to understand the challenging situations and dilemmas that emerge in program leaders’ daily work with youth. In this research the experiences of leaders in 12 programs were followed over a 2–9 month period, which led to the identification of 250 dilemma situations. Qualitative analyses identified 5 categories and 12 subcategories of dilemmas that reflected distinct types of considerations (e.g., youth’s personalities, relationships with the community). The analyses also found that the experienced leaders in the study typically responded to these dilemmas in ways that were youth-centered and that balanced multiple considerations. It is argued that researchers need to go beyond identifying features of high quality programs, and more fully examine how effective leaders create and sustain high quality in response to the challenging situations of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. (Ed.). (1999). Ethical issues in youth work. London, England: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. (2005). The ethical practitioner in formation: Issues in courage, competence and commitment. Social Work Education, 24, 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualizing vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Reynolds, M. (1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulation perspective. Child Development, 70, 1121–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camino, L. (2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). The present and future research on activity settings as developmental contexts. In J. Mahoney, J. Eccles, & R. Larson (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 353–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, E. T., Evertson, C. M., & Worsham, M. E. (2003). Classroom management for secondary teachers (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superiour expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 683–704). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 767–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R. (2005). Instrumental relationships: A potential relational model for inner-city youth programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (2004). Contexts for mentoring: Adolescent-adult relationships in workplaces and communities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 395–428). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B., & Smyth, L. (2000). Art show: Youth and community development. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imam, U. F. (1999). Youth workers as mediators and interpreters: Ethical issues in work with black young people. In S. Banks (Ed.), Ethical issues in youth work (pp. 125–144). London, England: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs, T., & Banks, S. (1999). Youth workers as controllers. In S. Banks (Ed.), Ethical issues in youth work (pp. 93–109). London, England: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, M. (2005). Four themes in youth work practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., Pearce, N., Sullivan, P., & Jarrett, R. L. (2007). Participation in youth programs as a catalyst for negotiation of family autonomy with connection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Walker, K. (2006). Learning about the “real world” in an urban arts program. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 244–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. B. (1994). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, S., & Quintrall, M. (2001). Managing effective classrooms. In J. Dillon & M. Maguire (Eds.), Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching (2nd Ed.) (pp. 150–161), Philadelphia (2nd ed., pp. 150–161). Philadelphia, Pa: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three strikes rule against pure discovery learning?: The case for methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (2000). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M., Irby, M., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIMH Consortium of Editors on Development and Psychopathology. (1999). Editorial statement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 489–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, J. L., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (2004). Professional development in the youth development field. Issues, trends, opportunities, and challenges. In D. B. Fink (Ed.), New directions for youth development: Doing the right thing: Ethical development across diverse environments no. 108 (pp. 13–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K., Shafer, J. L., & Klein, G. (2006). Professional judgments and “naturalistic decision making”. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 403–419). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Back to the rough ground: Beyond theory to practice in evaluation. Evaluation, 9, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Hohmann, C. (2005). Youth program quality assessment youth validation study: Findings for instrument validation. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2003). The essential youth worker. In F. A. Villarruel, D. F. Perkins, L. M. Borden, & J. G. Keith (Eds.), Community youth development: Programs, policies, and practices (pp. 373–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. C., & Larson, R. W. (2006). Balancing the professional and the personal. In D. A. Blyth & J. A. Walker (Eds.), New directions for youth development: Exceptional learning experiences for the middle years: Where high quality programs meet basic youth needs. no. 112 (pp. 109–118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. B., Kreider, H., Lopez, M. E., & Chatman, C. M. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing educators to involve families: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohalem, N., & Pittman, K. (2006). Putting youth work on the map. Washington, DC: Forum on Youth Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (2007). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment, Impact Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. (1999). The art of youth work. Lyme Regis: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S., & Camino, L. (1999). Youth leadership: Linking research and program theory to exemplary practice. Research and Practice, 15, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the program leaders and youth who shared their experiences with us. We also thank the William T. Grant Foundation for its support of this research; Joyce Walker, Andrew Tonachel, and Ted Christians for their input and ideas; and Nickki Pearce, Vikki Rompala, Aimee Rickman, Jane Brown, Patrick Sullivan, and Chidori Harris for valuable contributions to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reed W. Larson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, R.W., Walker, K.C. Dilemmas of Practice: Challenges to Program Quality Encountered by Youth Program Leaders. Am J Community Psychol 45, 338–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9307-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9307-z

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Youth practice
  • Program quality
  • Youth development
  • Practitioner dilemmas
  • Youth work