Dilemmas of Practice: Challenges to Program Quality Encountered by Youth Program Leaders

Original paper


To create and sustain high quality youth development programs it is important to understand the challenging situations and dilemmas that emerge in program leaders’ daily work with youth. In this research the experiences of leaders in 12 programs were followed over a 2–9 month period, which led to the identification of 250 dilemma situations. Qualitative analyses identified 5 categories and 12 subcategories of dilemmas that reflected distinct types of considerations (e.g., youth’s personalities, relationships with the community). The analyses also found that the experienced leaders in the study typically responded to these dilemmas in ways that were youth-centered and that balanced multiple considerations. It is argued that researchers need to go beyond identifying features of high quality programs, and more fully examine how effective leaders create and sustain high quality in response to the challenging situations of practice.


Adolescence Youth practice Program quality Youth development Practitioner dilemmas Youth work 


  1. Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, S. (Ed.). (1999). Ethical issues in youth work. London, England: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, S. (2005). The ethical practitioner in formation: Issues in courage, competence and commitment. Social Work Education, 24, 737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualizing vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Reynolds, M. (1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulation perspective. Child Development, 70, 1121–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camino, L. (2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eccles, J. S. (2005). The present and future research on activity settings as developmental contexts. In J. Mahoney, J. Eccles, & R. Larson (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 353–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Emmer, E. T., Evertson, C. M., & Worsham, M. E. (2003). Classroom management for secondary teachers (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superiour expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 683–704). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 767–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halpern, R. (2005). Instrumental relationships: A potential relational model for inner-city youth programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (2004). Contexts for mentoring: Adolescent-adult relationships in workplaces and communities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 395–428). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heath, S. B., & Smyth, L. (2000). Art show: Youth and community development. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Communities.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Imam, U. F. (1999). Youth workers as mediators and interpreters: Ethical issues in work with black young people. In S. Banks (Ed.), Ethical issues in youth work (pp. 125–144). London, England: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jeffs, T., & Banks, S. (1999). Youth workers as controllers. In S. Banks (Ed.), Ethical issues in youth work (pp. 93–109). London, England: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  23. Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Krueger, M. (2005). Four themes in youth work practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson, R., Pearce, N., Sullivan, P., & Jarrett, R. L. (2007). Participation in youth programs as a catalyst for negotiation of family autonomy with connection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson, R., & Walker, K. (2006). Learning about the “real world” in an urban arts program. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lerner, R. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Levin, B. B. (1994). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 64–79.Google Scholar
  29. Macrae, S., & Quintrall, M. (2001). Managing effective classrooms. In J. Dillon & M. Maguire (Eds.), Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching (2nd Ed.) (pp. 150–161), Philadelphia (2nd ed., pp. 150–161). Philadelphia, Pa: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three strikes rule against pure discovery learning?: The case for methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McLaughlin, M. (2000). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.Google Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, M., Irby, M., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. NIMH Consortium of Editors on Development and Psychopathology. (1999). Editorial statement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 489–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pace, J. L., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quinn, J. (2004). Professional development in the youth development field. Issues, trends, opportunities, and challenges. In D. B. Fink (Ed.), New directions for youth development: Doing the right thing: Ethical development across diverse environments no. 108 (pp. 13–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, K., Shafer, J. L., & Klein, G. (2006). Professional judgments and “naturalistic decision making”. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: Its development, organization and content (pp. 403–419). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Back to the rough ground: Beyond theory to practice in evaluation. Evaluation, 9, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, C., & Hohmann, C. (2005). Youth program quality assessment youth validation study: Findings for instrument validation. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, J. (2003). The essential youth worker. In F. A. Villarruel, D. F. Perkins, L. M. Borden, & J. G. Keith (Eds.), Community youth development: Programs, policies, and practices (pp. 373–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, K. C., & Larson, R. W. (2006). Balancing the professional and the personal. In D. A. Blyth & J. A. Walker (Eds.), New directions for youth development: Exceptional learning experiences for the middle years: Where high quality programs meet basic youth needs. no. 112 (pp. 109–118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Weiss, H. B., Kreider, H., Lopez, M. E., & Chatman, C. M. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing educators to involve families: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Yohalem, N., & Pittman, K. (2006). Putting youth work on the map. Washington, DC: Forum on Youth Investment.Google Scholar
  47. Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (2007). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment, Impact Strategies.Google Scholar
  48. Young, K. (1999). The art of youth work. Lyme Regis: Russell House.Google Scholar
  49. Zeldin, S., & Camino, L. (1999). Youth leadership: Linking research and program theory to exemplary practice. Research and Practice, 15, 10–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Human and Community DevelopmentUniversity of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Extension Center for Youth DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations