Advertisement

Four Keys to Success (Theory, Implementation, Evaluation, and Resource/System Support): High Hopes and Challenges in Participation

  • Abraham WandersmanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this article, I attempt to merge two themes. First, there is often a large gap between high hopes about impacts of policies or programs and the demonstrated results. I describe four keys/threats to success in any social problem area: theory, implementation, evaluation, and resource/system support. Second, I present theory and research from over 30 years of work on participation, conducted by my colleagues and myself that can illuminate and be illuminated by theory, implementation, evaluation, and resource/system support. I offer ideas for solutions that increase the probability of success. I conclude with the need to have high hopes tempered by theory and research to develop realistically ambitious solutions to social problems.

Keywords

Participation Theory Implementation Evaluation Resource/systems support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article describes a personal and professional journey of over 35 years. At the 2007 Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA) biennial, I gave an address in recognition of receiving the SCRA award for Distinguished Contributions to Theory and Research. The address was called “Optimism about participation: High hopes and challenges in neighborhood organizations, community coalitions, and empowerment evaluation systems”, and it was a major basis for this article. The article is an attempt to highlight some messages and underlying themes in over 35 years of work, described within a chronological history. At the biennial, I was very pleased to be introduced by Jean Ann Linney, whose remarks are also published in this volume.

I would like to gratefully acknowledge the enrichment of the work described in this article by the colleagues I have collaborated with over the years (many of whom are cited in this article). I am thankful for the thoughtful comments of many who have helped me think about many previous drafts of the article including: Victoria Chien, Steven Goldstein, Jason Katz, Jim Kelly, Cathy Lesesne, Jean Ann Linney, Emily Novick, Lois Pall Wandersman, and members of my graduate classes in community psychology.

References

  1. Albee, G. W. (2006). Psychologist sought social cures. The Washington Post, B06.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. (2005). An introduction to theory of change. Evaluation Exchange, Summer, Volume XI, 2. http://www.hfrp.org/evaluation/the-evaluation-exchange/issue-archive/evaluation-methodology/an-introduction-to-theory-of-change.
  3. Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, C. (1984). The art of coalition building: A guide for community leaders. New York, NY: American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  5. Butterfoss, F. D. B. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., et al. (2008). The Getting To Outcomes demonstration and evaluation: An Illustration of the prevention support system. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 206–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting To Outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation. (No. TR-TR101). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Available at http://www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR101/.
  8. Chinman, M., Imm, P., Wandersman, A., Kaftarian, S., Neal, J., Pendleton, K. T., et al. (2001). Using the Getting To Outcomes (GTO) model in a statewide prevention initiative. Health Promotion Practice, 2, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinman, M. T., & Wandersman, A. (1999). The benefits and costs of volunteering in community organizations: Review and practical implications. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton, J., Elias, M., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  11. Daniels, R. S., & O’Neil, C. (1979). The reverse RFP. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(1), 43–44.Google Scholar
  12. Dienstbier, J. (2006). Editorial column. International Herald Tribune.Google Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, D., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Wandersman, A. (2006). Getting to outcomes with developmental assets. Minneapolis: Search Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.Google Scholar
  18. Florin, P., Chavis, D., Wandersman, A., & Rich, R. (1992). A systems approach to understanding and enhancing grassroots community organizations: The block booster project. In R. Levine & H. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Analysis of dynamic psychological systems. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1984). Cognitive social learning variables and participation in community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fromm, E. (1968). The revolution of hope, toward a humanized psychology. NewYork: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Green, L. W. (2006). Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? American Journal of Public Health, 96, 406–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2002). Fighting back or fighting themselves? Community coalitions against substance abuse and their use of best practices. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossman, L. (2006). Time’s person of the year: You. Time Magazine. Accessed August 20, 2008, from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html?aid=434.
  24. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Livert, D., & Kadushin, C. (2002). Fighting back against substance abuse: Are community coalitions winning? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 237–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heller, K., Price, R., Riger, S., Reinharz, S., & Wandersman, A. (1984). Psychology and community change (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  26. Herbert, W. (2006). The passing of a visionary. Psychotherapy Networker, 1 Sept 2006.Google Scholar
  27. Hingson, R. W., Zakocs, R. C., Heeren, T., Winter, M. R., Rosenbloom, D., & DeJong, W. (2005). Effects on alcohol related fatal crashes of a community based initiative to increase substance abuse treatment and reduce alcohol availability. Injury Prevention, 11(2), 84–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoppenfeld, M. (1967). A sketch of the planning-guiding process for Columbia Maryland. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33, 398–409.Google Scholar
  29. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Keener, D. C., Snell-Johns, J., Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Lessons that influenced the current conceptualization of empowerment evaluation: Reflections from two evaluation projects. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Principles in practice (pp. 73–91). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, J. G. (1971). Qualities for the community psychologist. American Psychologist, 26, 897–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., & Young, L. A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 49–63.Google Scholar
  33. Lesesne, C. A., Lewis, K. M., White, C. P., Green, D., Duffy, J., & Wandersman, A. (2008). Promoting science-based approaches to teen pregnancy prevention: Proactively engaging the three systems of the interactive systems framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 379–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Livet, M., Courser, M., & Wandersman, A. (2008). The prevention delivery system: Organizational context and use of comprehensive programming frameworks. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 361–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Organizational functioning: Facilitating effective interventions and increasing the odds of programming success. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Principles in practice (pp. 123–154). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Merzel, C., & D’Afflitti, J. (2003). Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 557–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, R. L., & Campbell, R. (2006). Taking stock of empowerment evaluation: An empirical review. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3), 296–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller, F. D., Malia, G., & Tsemberis, S. (1979). Community activism and the maintenance of urban neighborhoods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York.Google Scholar
  39. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K., Morrissey-Kane, E., Seybolt, D., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 449–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozer, E., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 472–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Packard, V. (1972). A nation of strangers. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  42. Patton, M. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (2003) http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov.
  44. Prestby, J., & Wandersman, A. (1985). An empirical exploration of a framework of organizational viability: Maintaining block organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prestby, J., Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Chavis, D. (1990). Benefits, costs, incentive management and participation in voluntary organizations: A means to understanding and promoting empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reich, C. A. (1970). The greening of America. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenbaum, D. P. (1986). Community crime prevention: Does it work?. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sarason, S. B. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  51. Saxe, L., Kadushin, C., Tighe, E., Beveridge, A., Brodsky, D., Livert, D., et al. (2002). The front lines of the war against drugs: Can research help direct policy?. Mass, Waltham: Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management.Google Scholar
  52. Scriven, M. (2005). Review of the book: Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life (2nd ed.). New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  54. Shapiro, J. (1982). Evaluation as theory testing: An example from Head Start. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 341–353.Google Scholar
  55. Shapiro, J. Z. (1985). Evaluation of a worksite program in health science and medicine: An application of Stake’s model of contingency and congruence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 341–353.Google Scholar
  56. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  57. Slater, P. (1970). The pursuit of loneliness. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  58. Trickett, E. J. (2007). From “Water boiling in a Peruvian town” to “Letting them die”: Culture, community psychology, and the metabolic balance of patience and zeal. Keynote address presented to the Society for Community Research and Action 11th biennial conference in Pasadena Ca.Google Scholar
  59. Wandersman, A. (1979a). User participation: A study of types of participation, effects, mediators and individual differences. Environment and Behavior, 11, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wandersman, A. (1979b). User participation in planning environments: A conceptual framework. Environment and Behavior, 11, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, S., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 171–181.Google Scholar
  62. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Chavis, D., Rich, R., & Prestby, J. (1985). Getting together and getting things done. Psychology Today, 19, 64–71.Google Scholar
  64. Wandersman, A., & Giamartino, G. (1980). Community and individual differences characteristics as influences on initial participation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wandersman, A., Goodman, R. M., & Butterfoss, F. D. (2005a). Understanding coalitions and how they operate. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (2nd ed., pp. 292–313). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (1999). Getting to outcomes: Methods and tools for planning, evaluation and accountability. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.Google Scholar
  67. Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and program planning, 23, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wandersman, A., Jakubs, J., & Giamartino, G. (1981). Participation in block organizations. Journal of Community Action, 1, 40–47.Google Scholar
  69. Wandersman, A., Snell-Johns, J., Lentz, B., Fetterman, D., Keener, D., Livet, M., et al. (2005b). The principles of empowerment evaluation. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wandersman, L. P., Wandersman, A., & Kahn, S. (1980). Social support in the transition to parenthood. Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yates, D. (1973). Neighborhood democracy. Lexington, MA: Health.Google Scholar
  72. Yin, R. K., Kaftarian, S. J., Yu, P., & Jansen, M. A. (1997). Outcomes from CSAP’s community partnership program: Findings from the national cross-site evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations