Abstract
In this paper, discrimination between two populations following the growth curve model is considered. A likelihood-based classification procedure is established, in the sense that we compare the two likelihoods given that the new observation belongs to respective population. The possibility to classify the new observation as belonging to an unknown population is discussed, which is shown to be natural when considering growth curves. Several examples and simulations are given to emphasize this possibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, J. M., Kshirsagar, A. M. (1993). The reduced-rank growth curve model for discriminant analysis of longitudinal data. Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 345–357.
Anderson, T. W. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley series in probability and statistics (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Barnard, M. M. (1935). The secular variations of skull characters in four series of Egyptian skulls. Annals of Eugenics, 6, 352–371.
Bartlett, M. S. (1938). Further aspects of the theory of multiple regression. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 34, 33–40.
Bartlett, M. S. (1939). A note on tests of significance in multivariate analysis. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 35, 180–185.
Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The goodness of fit of a single hypothetical discriminant function in the case of several groups. Annals of Eugenics, 16, 199–214.
Burnaby, T. P. (1966). Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics, 22, 96–110.
Dasgupta, S. (1993). The evolution of the D\(^2\) statistic of Mahalanobis. Sankhyā, 55, 442–459.
Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179–188.
Fisher, R. A. (1938). The statistical utilization of multiple measurements. Annals of Eugenics, 8, 376–386. (Revised 1950, in Contributions to Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York).
Hodges, J. L. (1950). Discriminatory analysis. I. Survey of discriminatory analysis (Report No. 1, Project No. 21-49-004). USAF School of Aviation Medicine, October 1950. (NTIS No. PB 102-690).
Hotelling, H. (1931). The generalization of Student’s ratio. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 360–378.
Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variables. Biometrika, 28, 321–377.
Huberty, C. J. (1975). Discriminant analysis. Review of Educational Research, 45, 543–598.
Khatri, C. G. (1966). A note on a MANOVA model applied to problems in growth curve. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 18, 75–86.
Kollo, T., and von Rosen, D. (2005). Advanced multivariate statistics with matrices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kshirsagar, A. M. (1962). A note on the direction and collinearity factors in canonical analysis. Biometrika, 9, 255–259.
Kshirsagar, A. M., Davis, T. M. (1983a). Direction and collinearity factors of Wilks’ \(\Lambda \) associated with the Growth Curve model. Australian Journal of Statistics, 25, 467–481.
Kshirsagar, A. M., Davis, T. M. (1983b). Discriminant functions from the dummy variable space for growth curve models. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 12, 427–440.
Lee, J. C. (1982). Classification of Growth Curves. In Classification, pattern recognition and reduction of dimensionality, Handbook of statist. (Vol. 2, pp. 121–137). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, 2, 49–55.
McLachlan, G. J. (2004). Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. Hoboken: Wiley.
Mentz, G. B., Kshirsagar, A. M. (2004). Classification using growth curves. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 33, 2487–2502.
Muirhead, R. J. (1982). Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.
Ngailo, E. K., von Rosen, D., Singull, M. (2021). Asymptotic approximation of misclassification probabilities in linear discriminant analysis with repeated measurements. Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis de Mathematica, 25, 67–85.
Pearson, K. (1915). On the problem of sexing osteometric material. Biometrika, 10, 479–487.
Pearson, K. (1926). On the coefficient of racial likeness. Biometrika, 18, 105–117.
Potthoff, R. F., Roy, S. N. (1964). A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems. Biometrika, 51, 313–326.
Rao, C. R. (1948). The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 10, 159–203.
Rao, C. R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves. Biometrics, 14, 1–17.
Rao, C. R. (1959). Some problems involving linear hypotheses in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 46, 49–58.
Rao, C. R. (1966). Discriminant function between composite hypotheses and related problems. Biometrika, 53, 339–345.
Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Seal, B. (1911). Meaning of race, tribe, nation. In G. Spiller (Ed.) Inter-racial problems (pp. 1–12). London: Universal Races Congress. https://archive.org/details/papersoninterrac00univiala/page/n51/mode/2up?q=Seal.
Srivastava, M. S. (2002). Method of multivariate statistics. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Srivastava, M. S., Khatri, C. G. (1979). An introduction to multivariate statistics. New York-Oxford: North-Holland.
von Rosen, D. (2018). Bilinear regression analysis: An introduction. Lecture notes in statistics (Vol. 220). New York: Springer.
Wald, A. (1944). On a statistical problem arising in the classification of an individual into one of two groups. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 15, 145–162.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable and helpful suggestions which have significantly improved the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
von Rosen, D., Singull, M. Using the growth curve model in classification of repeated measurements. Ann Inst Stat Math 76, 511–534 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-024-00900-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-024-00900-1