Advertisement

A review of alignment based similarity measures for web usage mining

  • Vinh-Trung Luu
  • Germain ForestierEmail author
  • Jonathan Weber
  • Paul Bourgeois
  • Fahima Djelil
  • Pierre-Alain Muller
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

In order to understand web-based application user behavior, web usage mining applies unsupervised learning techniques to discover hidden patterns from web data that captures user browsing on web sites. For this purpose, web session clustering has been among the most popular approaches to group users with similar browsing patterns that reflect their common interest. An adequate web session clustering implementation significantly depends on the measure that is used to evaluate the similarity of sessions. An efficient approach to evaluate session similarity is sequence alignment, which is known as the task of determining the similarity of elements between sequences. In this paper, we review and compare sequence alignment-based measures for web sessions, and also discuss sequence similarity measures that are not alignment-based. This review also provides a perspective of sequence similarity measures that manipulate web sessions in usage clustering process.

Keywords

Web mining Sequence alignment Clustering Sequence similarity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thanks the Beampulse company for providing datasets to perform experiments. They also like to thanks VIET and Campus France for funding this research.

References

  1. Algiriyage N, Jayasena S, Dias G (2015) Web user profiling using hierarchical clustering with improved similarity measure. In: Moratuwa engineering research conference (MERCon). IEEE, pp 295–300Google Scholar
  2. Anandhi D, Ahmed MI (2017) Prediction of user’s type and navigation pattern using clustering and classification algorithms. Clust Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1090-2
  3. Anupama D, Gowda SD (2015) Clustering of web user sessions to maintain occurrence of sequence in navigation pattern. Procedia Comput Sci 58:558–564Google Scholar
  4. Aruk T, Ustek D, Kursun O (2012) A comparative analysis of smith-waterman based partial alignment. In: IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC). IEEE, pp 000250–000252Google Scholar
  5. Azimpour-Kivi M, Azmi R (2011) A webpage similarity measure for web sessions clustering using sequence alignment. In: International symposium on artificial intelligence and signal processing (AISP). IEEE, pp 20–24Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee A, Ghosh J (2001) Clickstream clustering using weighted longest common subsequences. In: Proceedings of the web mining workshop at the 1st SIAM conference on data mining, vol 143. Citeseer, p 144Google Scholar
  7. Barton C, Flouri T, Iliopoulos CS, Pissis SP (2015) Global and local sequence alignment with a bounded number of gaps. Theor Comput Sci 582:1–16MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bose RJC, van der Aalst WM (2012) Process diagnostics using trace alignment: opportunities, issues, and challenges. Inf Syst 37(2):117–141Google Scholar
  9. Bouguessa M (2011) A practical approach for clustering transaction data. In: Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition. Springer, pp 265–279Google Scholar
  10. Breitinger F, Baier H (2012) A fuzzy hashing approach based on random sequences and hamming distance. In: Proceedings of the conference on digital forensics, security and law. Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, p 89Google Scholar
  11. Bucka-Lassen K, Caprani O, Hein J (1999) Combining many multiple alignments in one improved alignment. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 15(2):122–130Google Scholar
  12. Buscaldi D, Tournier R, Aussenac-Gilles N, Mothe J (2012) Irit: textual similarity combining conceptual similarity with an n-gram comparison method. In: Proceedings of the first joint conference on lexical and computational semantics-volume 1: proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and volume 2: proceedings of the sixth international workshop on semantic evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 552–556Google Scholar
  13. Chakraborty A, Bandyopadhyay S (2013a) Clustering of web sessions by fogsaa. In: IEEE recent advances in intelligent computational systems (RAICS). IEEE, pp 282–287Google Scholar
  14. Chakraborty A, Bandyopadhyay S (2013b) FOGSAA: fast optimal global sequence alignment algorithm. Sci Rep 3:1746Google Scholar
  15. Chaofeng L (2009) Research on web session clustering. J Softw 4(5):460–468Google Scholar
  16. Chitraa V, Thanamni AS (2012) An enhanced clustering technique for web usage mining. Int J Eng Res Technol 1:1–5Google Scholar
  17. Chordia BS, Adhiya KP (2011) Grouping web access sequences using sequence alignment method. Indian J Comput Sci Eng (IJCSE) 2(3):308–314Google Scholar
  18. Daily J (2016) Parasail: SIMD C library for global, semi-global, and local pairwise sequence alignments. BMC Bioinform 17(1):81MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Della Vedova G (2000) Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic reconstruction: theory and methods in biological data analysis. Ph.D. thesis, CiteseerGoogle Scholar
  20. Delmestri A, Cristianini N (2010) String similarity measures and PAM-like matrices for cognate identification. UOB-ISLTR2010Google Scholar
  21. Deza MM, Deza E (2013) Distances and similarities in data analysis. In: Encyclopedia of distances. Springer, pp 291–305Google Scholar
  22. Dhandi M, Chakrawarti RK (2016) A comprehensive study of web usage mining. In: Symposium on colossal data analysis and networking (CDAN). IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  23. Di Tommaso P, Moretti S, Xenarios I, Orobitg M, Montanyola A, Chang JM, Taly JF, Notredame C (2011) T-coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and rna sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res 39(suppl-2):W13–W17Google Scholar
  24. Dimopoulos C, Makris C, Panagis Y, Theodoridis E, Tsakalidis A (2010) A web page usage prediction scheme using sequence indexing and clustering techniques. Data Knowl Eng 69(4):371–382Google Scholar
  25. Eddy SR (2004) What is a hidden markov model? Nat Biotechnol 22(10):1315–1316Google Scholar
  26. Edgar RC (2004) Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5):1792–1797Google Scholar
  27. Edgar RC, Edgar RC, Edgar RC, USCLE M (2005) Muscle user guide. Technical report. http://www.drive5.com/muscle/docs.htm. Accessed Jan 2019
  28. El Azab A, Mahmood MA, El-Aziz A (2017) Effectiveness of web usage mining techniques in business application. The dark web: breakthroughs in research and practice, p 227Google Scholar
  29. Gauch S, Speretta M, Chandramouli A, Micarelli A (2007) User profiles for personalized information access. In: The adaptive web. Springer, pp 54–89Google Scholar
  30. Gonnet GH, Benner SA (1996) Probabilistic ancestral sequences and multiple alignments. In: Scandinavian workshop on algorithm theory. Springer, pp 380–391Google Scholar
  31. Gündüz Ş, Özsu MT (2003) A web page prediction model based on click-stream tree representation of user behavior. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 535–540Google Scholar
  32. Hay B, Wets G, Vanhoof K (2004) Mining navigation patterns using a sequence alignment method. Knowl Inf Syst 6(2):150–163Google Scholar
  33. Higgins D (1997) Multiple sequence alignment. In: Genetic databases. Elsevier, pp 165–183Google Scholar
  34. Howard RA (1966) Dynamic programming. Manag Sci 12(5):317–348Google Scholar
  35. Hung JH, Weng Z (2016) Sequence alignment and homology search with blast and clustalw. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2016(11):pdb–prot093088Google Scholar
  36. Hung YS, Chen KLB, Yang CT, Deng GF (2013) Web usage mining for analysing elder self-care behavior patterns. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):775–783Google Scholar
  37. Kondrak G (2005) N-gram similarity and distance. In: International symposium on string processing and information retrieval. Springer, pp 115–126Google Scholar
  38. Li C (2009) Research on web session clustering. J Softw 4(5):460–468Google Scholar
  39. Li C, Lu Y (2007) Similarity measurement of web sessions by sequence alignment. In: IFIP international conference on network and parallel computing workshops, NPC Workshops. IEEE, pp 716–720Google Scholar
  40. Li H, Homer N (2010) A survey of sequence alignment algorithms for next-generation sequencing. Brief Bioinform 11(5):473–483Google Scholar
  41. Liu Y, Li Z, Xiong H, Gao X, Wu J (2010) Understanding of internal clustering validation measures. In: International conference on data mining. IEEE, pp 911–916Google Scholar
  42. Liu Z, Wang Y, Dontcheva M, Hoffman M, Walker S, Wilson A (2017) Patterns and sequences: Interactive exploration of clickstreams to understand common visitor paths. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 23(1):321–330Google Scholar
  43. Lopes P, Roy B (2015) Dynamic recommendation system using web usage mining for e-commerce users. Procedia Comput Sci 45:60–69Google Scholar
  44. Lu L, Dunham M, Meng Y (2005) Discovery of significant usage patterns from clusters of clickstream data. In: Proceedings of WebKDD. Citeseer, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  45. Luu VT, Forestier G, Fondement F, Muller PA (2015) Web site audience segmentation using hybrid alignment techniques. In: Trends and applications in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer, pp 29–40Google Scholar
  46. Luu VT, Forestier G, Ripken M, Fondement F, Muller PA (2016a) Web usage prediction and recommendation using web session clustering. In: Eleventh international conference on digital information management (ICDIM). IEEE, pp 107–113Google Scholar
  47. Luu VT, Ripken M, Forestier G, Fondement F, Muller PA (2016b) Using glocal event alignment for comparing sequences of significantly different lengths. In: Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition. Springer, pp 58–72Google Scholar
  48. Madeira F, Park YM, Lee J, Buso N, Gur T, Madhusoodanan N, Basutkar P, Tivey A, Potter S, Finn RD, Lopez R (2019) The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz268
  49. Maetschke SR, Kassahn KS, Dunn JA, Han SP, Curley EZ, Stacey KJ, Ragan MA (2010) A visual framework for sequence analysis using n-grams and spectral rearrangement. Bioinformatics 26(6):737–744Google Scholar
  50. Maleki S, Musuvathi M, Mytkowicz T (2016) Efficient parallelization using rank convergence in dynamic programming algorithms. Commun ACM 59(10):85–92Google Scholar
  51. Malik ZK, Fyfe C (2012) Review of web personalization. J Emerg Technol Web Intell 4(3):285–296Google Scholar
  52. Mandal OP, Azad HK (2014) Web access prediction model using clustering and artificial neural network. Int J Eng Res Technol 3Google Scholar
  53. Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1986) A study of the comparability of external criteria for hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivar Behav Res 21(4):441–458Google Scholar
  54. Mishra R, Kumar P, Bhasker B (2014) An alternative approach for clustering web user sessions considering sequential information. Intell Data Anal 18(2):137–156Google Scholar
  55. Nakamura A, Kudo M (2011) Packing alignment: alignment for sequences of various length events. In: Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer, pp 234–245Google Scholar
  56. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48(3):443–453Google Scholar
  57. Neelima G, Rodda S (2016) Predicting user behavior through sessions using the web log mining. In: International conference on advances in human machine interaction (HMI). IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  58. Pandi M, Kashefi O, Minaei B et al (2011) A novel similarity measure for sequence data. J Inf Process Syst 7(3):413–424Google Scholar
  59. Petitjean F, Forestier G, Webb G, Nicholson AE, Chen Y, Keogh E, et al (2014) Dynamic time warping averaging of time series allows faster and more accurate classification. In: International conference on data mining. IEEE, pp 470–479Google Scholar
  60. Pinkham J (2010) Method of tracking and targeting internet payloads based on time spent actively viewing. US Patent App. 12/393,546Google Scholar
  61. Poornalatha G, Prakash SR (2013) Web sessions clustering using hybrid sequence alignment measure (HSAM). Soc Netw Anal Min 3(2):257–268Google Scholar
  62. Poornalatha G, Raghavendra P (2011a) Alignment based similarity distance measure for better web sessions clustering. Procedia Comput Sci 5:450–457Google Scholar
  63. Poornalatha G, Raghavendra PS (2011b) Web user session clustering using modified k-means algorithm. In: Advances in computing and communications. Springer, pp 243–252Google Scholar
  64. Pramanik S, Setua S (2017) An opposition based differential evolution to solve multiple sequence alignment. In: International conference on computational intelligence, communications, and business analytics. Springer, pp 440–450Google Scholar
  65. Raphaeli O, Goldstein A, Fink L (2017) Analyzing online consumer behavior in mobile and PC devices: a novel web usage mining approach. Electron Commer Res Appl 26:1–12Google Scholar
  66. Rendón E, Abundez I, Arizmendi A, Quiroz E (2011) Internal versus external cluster validation indexes. Int J Comput Commun 5(1):27–34Google Scholar
  67. Rosenberg MS (2009) Sequence alignment: methods, models, concepts, and strategies. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  68. Shi P (2009) An efficient approach for clustering web access patterns from web logs. Int J Adv Sci Technol 5(1):354–362Google Scholar
  69. Si J, Li Q, Qian T, Deng X (2012) Discovering \(k\) web user groups with specific aspect interests. In: Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition. Springer, pp 321–335Google Scholar
  70. Smith TF, Waterman MS (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147(1):195–197Google Scholar
  71. Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R (1995) A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene 167(1):GC1–GC10Google Scholar
  72. Taly JF, Magis C, Bussotti G, Chang JM, Di Tommaso P, Erb I, Espinosa-Carrasco J, Kemena C, Notredame C (2011) Using the t-coffee package to build multiple sequence alignments of protein, RNA, DNA sequences and 3D structures. Nat Protoc 6(11):1669Google Scholar
  73. Tan CW, Herrmann M, Forestier G, Webb GI, Petitjean F (2018) Efficient search of the best warping window for dynamic time warping. In: Proceedings of the 2018 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, pp 225–233Google Scholar
  74. Ting IH, Clark L, Kimble C (2009) Identifying web navigation behaviour and patterns automatically from clickstream data. Int J Web Eng Technol 5(4):398–426Google Scholar
  75. Tong JC (2013) Blocks substitution matrix (BLOSUM). In: Encyclopedia of systems biology. Springer, pp 152–152Google Scholar
  76. Vorontsov IE, Kulakovskiy IV, Makeev VJ (2013) Jaccard index based similarity measure to compare transcription factor binding site models. Algorithms Mol Biol 8(1):1Google Scholar
  77. Wagh R, Patil J (2017) Enhanced web personalization for improved browsing experience. Adv Comput Sci Technol 10(6):1953–1968Google Scholar
  78. Wang W, Zaïane OR (2002) Clustering web sessions by sequence alignment. In: Proceedings of 13th international workshop on database and expert systems applications. IEEE, pp 394–398Google Scholar
  79. Wang XD, Liu JX, Xu Y, Zhang J (2015) A survey of multiple sequence alignment techniques. In: International conference on intelligent computing. Springer, pp 529–538Google Scholar
  80. Wang G, Zhang X, Tang S, Zheng H, Zhao BY (2016) Unsupervised clickstream clustering for user behavior analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 225–236Google Scholar
  81. Yan R, Xu D, Yang J, Walker S, Zhang Y (2013) A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction. Sci Rep 3:2619Google Scholar
  82. Yang J, Huang H, Jin X (2017) Mining web access sequence with improved apriori algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on computational science and engineering (CSE) and embedded and ubiquitous computing (EUC), vol 1. IEEE, pp 780–784Google Scholar
  83. Yilmaz H, Senkul P (2010) Using ontology and sequence information for extracting behavior patterns from web navigation logs. In: IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, pp 549–556Google Scholar
  84. Zahid SK, Hasan L, Khan AA, Ullah S (2015) A novel structure of the smith-waterman algorithm for efficient sequence alignment. In: International conference on digital information, networking, and wireless communications (DINWC). IEEE, pp 6–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRIMASUniversité de Haute-AlsaceMulhouseFrance

Personalised recommendations