Bayesian networks (BNs) constitute a powerful framework for probabilistic reasoning and have been extensively used in different research domains. This paper presents an improved hybrid learning strategy that features parameterized genetic algorithms (GAs) to learn the structure of BNs underlying a set of data samples. The performance of GAs is influenced by the choice of multiple initial parameters. This work is concerned with designing a series of parameter-less hybrid methods on a build-up basis: first the standard implementation is refined with the previously-developed data-informed evolutionary strategies. Then, two novel knowledge-driven parent controlling enhancements are presented. The first improvement works upon the parent limitation setting. BN structure learning algorithms typically set a bound for the maximum number of parents a BN node can possess to comply with the computational feasibility of the learning process. Our proposed method carefully selects the parents to rule out based on a knowledge-driven strategy. The second enhancement aims at reducing the sensitivity of the parent control setting by dynamically adjusting the maximum number of parents each node can hold. In the experimental section, it is shown how the adopted baseline outperforms the competitor algorithms included in the benchmark: thanks to its global search capabilities, the genetic methodology can efficiently prevail over other state-of-the-art structural learners on large networks. Presented experiments also prove how the proposed methods enhance the algorithmic efficiency and sensitivity to parameter setting, and address the problem of data fragmentation with respect to the baseline, with the advantage of higher performances in some cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Berzan C (2012) An exploration of structure learning in Bayesian networks. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford
Bromley J, Jackson N, Clymer O, Giacomello A, Jensen F (2005) The use of Hugin to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ Model Soft 20:231–242
Buntine W (1994) Operations for learning with graphical models. J Artif Intell Res 2:159–225. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.62
Buntine WL (1991) Theory refinement on Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the seventh conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Los Angeles, pp 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-55860-203-8.50010-3
Carvalho A (2011) A cooperative coevolutionary genetic algorithm for learning Bayesian network structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th genetic and evolutionary computation conference. ACM, New York, pp 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2001576.2001729
Chickering DM, Heckerman D, Meek C (2004) Large-sample learning of Bayesian networks is NP-hard. J Mach Learn Res 5:1287–1330
Chow CK, Liu CN (1968) Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 14:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1968.1054142
Contaldi C, Vafaee F, Nelson PC (2017) The role of crossover operator in Bayesian network structure learning performance: a comprehensive comparative study and new insights. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, GECCO ’17. ACM, New York, pp 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1145/3071178.3071240
Cooper GF, Herskovits E (1992) A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Mach Learn 9:309–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00994110
de Campos LM, Fernández-Luna JM, Huete JF (2004) Bayesian networks and information retrieval: an introduction to the special issue. Inf Process Manag 40:727–733
Dunn OJ (1961) Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc 56(293):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
Eades P, Lin X, Smyth WF (1993) A fast and effective heuristic for the feedback arc set problem. Inf Process Lett 47:319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(93)90079-o
Eiben AE, Hinterding R, Michalewicz Z (1999) Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 3(2):124–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.771166
Friedman N, Geiger D, Goldszmidt M (1997) Bayesian networks classifiers. Mach Learn 29:131–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465528199
Friedman N, Nachman I, Peér D (1999) Learning Bayesian network structure from massive datasets: the “sparse candidate” algorithm. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, association for uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AUAI), Stockholm, pp 206–215
Hill SM, Lu Y, Molina J, Heiser LM, Spellman PT, Speed TP, Gray JW, Mills GB, Mukherjee S (2012) Bayesian inference of signaling network topology in a cancer cell line. Bioinformatics 28:2804–2810
Kabli R, Herrmann F, McCall J (2007) A chain-model genetic algorithm for Bayesian network structure learning. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/1276958.1277200
Kahn CE, Roberts LM, Shaffer KA, Haddawy P (1997) Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput Biol Med 27:19–29
Larrañaga P, Kuijpers CMH, Murga RH, Yurramendi Y (1996) Learning Bayesian network structures by searching for the best ordering with genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 26:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.508827
Leray P, Francois O (2004) BNT structure learning package: documentation and experiments. Technical report, Laboratoire PSI, Universitè et INSA de Rouen
McDonald JH (2014) Handbook of biological statistics, 3rd edn. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore
Pearl J (2000) Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press, New York
Pearson K (1900) On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos Mag 50:157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440009463897
Pellet J, Elisseeff A (2008) Using Markov blankets for causal structure learning. J Mach Learn Res 9:1295–1342
Rudolph G (1994) Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:96–101
Sachs K, Perez O, Pe’er D (2005) Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 308:523–529
Scutari M (2016) Bayesian network repository. URL http://www.bnlearn.com/bnrepository/
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practices of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412280
Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R (2000) Causation, predition and search, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9
Teyssier M, Koller D (2005) Ordering-based search: a simple and effective algorithm for learning Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Edinburgh, pp 584–590
Tsamardinos I, Brown LE, Aliferis C (2006) The max–min hill-climbing Bayesian network structure learning algorithm. Mach Learn 65:31–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6889-7
Uusitalo L (2007) Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol Modell 203:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033
Uusitalo L, Kuikka S, Romakkaniemi A (2005) Estimation of Atlantic salmon smolt carrying capacity of rivers using expert knowledge. ICES J Mar Sci 62:708–722
Vafaee F (2014) Learning the structure of large-scale Bayesian networks using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598223
Vafaee F, Turán G, Nelson PC, Berger-Wolf TY (2014a) Among-site rate variation: adaptation of genetic algorithm mutation rates at each single site. In: Proceedings of the 2014 annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598216
Vafaee F, Turán G, Nelson PC, Berger-Wolf TY (2014b) Balancing the exploration and exploitation in an adaptive diversity guided genetic algorithm. In: 2014 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, Beijing. https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.2014.6900257
Van Rijsbergen CJ (1979) Information retrieval, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London
Villanueva E, Maciel CD (2014) Efficient methods for learning Bayesian network super-structures. Neurocomputing 123:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2012.10.035
Wong ML, Lee SY, Leung KS (2004) Data mining of Bayesian networks using cooperative co-evolution. Decis Support Syst 38:451–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00115-5
Wooldridge S, Done T (2004) Learning to predict large-scale coral bleaching from past events: a Bayesian approach using remotely sensed data, in-situ data, and environmental proxies. Coral Reefs 23:96–108
Xia J, Neapolitan R, Barmadaand MM, Visweswaran S (2011) Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria. BMC Bioinform 12:89
Yehezkel R, Lerner B (2009) Bayesian network structure learning by recursive autonomy identification. J Mach Learn Res 10:1527–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/11815921_16
Conflicts of interest
This study acts in accordance with the ethical standards. There was no funding particularly associated with this study and the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Contaldi, C., Vafaee, F. & Nelson, P.C. Bayesian network hybrid learning using an elite-guided genetic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 52, 245–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9615-5
- Bayesian networks
- Structure learning
- Genetic algorithms
- Parent control