Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing the diversity of conversational collaborative recommendations: a comparison

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In conversational collaborative recommender systems, user feedback influences the recommendations. We report mechanisms for enhancing the diversity of the recommendations made by collaborative recommenders. We focus on techniques for increasing diversity that rely on collaborative data only. In our experiments, we compare different mechanisms and show that, if recommendations are diverse, users find target items in many fewer recommendation cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balabanović M and Shoham Y (1997). Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM 40(3): 66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley K, Smyth B (2001) Improving recommendation diversity. In: O’Donoghue D (ed) Proceedings of the 12th Irish conference on artificial intelligence and cognitive science. NUI Maynooth, pp 85–94

  • Bridge D, Ferguson A (2002) Diverse product recommendations using an expressive language for case retrieval. In: Craw S, Preece A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th European conference on case-based reasoning. Springer, pp 43–57

  • Bridge D, Göker MH, McGinty L and Smyth B (2006). Case-based recommender systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 20(3): 315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge D, Kelly JP (2005) Diversity-enhanced conversational collaborative recommendations. In: Creaney N (ed) Proceedings of the 16th Irish conference on artificial intelligence & cognitive science. University of Ulster, pp 29–38

  • Burke RD, Hammond KJ and Young BC (1997). The findme approach to assisted browsing. IEEE Expert 12(5): 32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle M, Cunningham P (2000) A dynamic approach to reducing dialog in on-line decision guides. In: Blanzieri E, Portinale L (eds) Proceedings of the 5th European workshop on case-based reasoning. Trento, Italy, Springer: pp 49–60

  • Herlocker J, Konstan JA, Terveen LG and Riedl JT (2004). Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22(1): 5–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlocker JL (2000) Understanding and improving automated collaborative filtering systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota

  • Linden, G, Hanks S, Lesh N (1997) Interactive assessment of user preference models: the automated travel assistant. In: Jameson A, Paris C, Tasso C (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on user modeling. Springer, pp 67–78

  • McGinty L, Smyth B (2002) Comparison-based recommendation. In: Craw S, Preece A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th European conference on case-based reasoning. Aberdeen, Scotland, Springer, pp 575–589

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinty L, Smyth B (2003) On the role of diversity in conversational recommender systems. In: Ashley K, Bridge D (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on case-based reasoning. Springer, pp 276–290

  • McSherry D (2002) Diversity-conscious retrieval. In: Craw S, Preece A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th European conference on case-based reasoning. Springer, pp 219–233

  • Pu P, Viappiani P, Faltings B (2006) Increasing user decision accuracy using suggestions. In: Grinter R et al (eds) Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI). ACM Press, pp 121–130

  • Rafter R, Smyth B (2004) Towards conversational collaborative filtering. In: McGinty L, Crean B (eds) Proceedings of the 15th artificial intelligence and cognitive science conference. pp 147–156

  • Reilly J, McCarthy K, McGinty L, Smyth B (2004) Dynamic critiquing. In: Funk P, González-Calero PA (eds) Proceedings of the 7th European conference on case-based reasoning. Madrid, Spain, Springer, pp 763–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick P and Varian HR (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3): 56–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl J, Konstan J (2002) Word of mouse: the marketing power of collaborative filtering. Warner Books

  • Sarwar BM, Karypis G, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th international world Wide Web Conference. pp 285–295

  • Schmitt S (2002). simVar; A similarity-influenced question selection criterion for e-sales dialogs. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(3–4): 195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazu H (2002). ExpertClerk: a conversational case-based reasoning tool for developing salesclerk agents in E-Commerce webshops. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(3–4): 223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth B, McClave P (2001) Similarity vs. diversity. In: Aha DW, Watson I (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on case-based reasoning. Springer, pp 347–361

  • Ziegler C-N, McNee SM, Konstan JA, Lausen G (2005) Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceedings of the 14th international World Wide Web Conference. ACM Press, pp 22–32

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Paul Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, J.P., Bridge, D. Enhancing the diversity of conversational collaborative recommendations: a comparison. Artif Intell Rev 25, 79–95 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9023-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9023-8

Keywords

Navigation