Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamicity of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Usage Pattern and Association with Executed Adherence in MSM: An Implementation Study in Hong Kong

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 1 Altmetric

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been shown to be effective for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men (MSM). PrEP use coverage aside, maintenance of high PrEP adherence is crucial in ensuring the achievement of HIV prevention. In this PrEP implementation study in Hong Kong, we examined the patterns of PrEP use in MSM and evaluated their association with prevention-effective adherence for HIV prevention. In January 2020–June 2021 in Hong Kong, 312 recruited MSM (median 30 years old) were followed up for 1 year, with HIV and creatinine testing, consultation, and PrEP refill. No HIV breakthrough infection was observed. As a measure of prevention-effective adherence, executed adherence (EA) was expressed as the proportion of days with HIV risk that were protected by PrEP and/or condom in 6 months. In 65,585 diary entries of 215 MSM, the median proportion of EA achieved was 89% (IQR 84–93%). Three latent classes of PrEP users were identified by latent class analysis. Taking Class 1 “daily dominant PrEP” (n = 113, 53%) as reference, Class 2 “episodic PrEP” (n = 76, 35%) was adopted by MSM with less sexual activity, had less PrEP refill and lower EA level, while Class 3 “mixed PrEP schedule” (n = 26, 12%) MSM were more sexually active but with a similar EA level. The study findings showed varied and dynamic PrEP usage patterns in the real-world setting. Strategies for promoting adherence are needed to ensure the maintenance of high EA level among PrEP-using MSM especially those on episodic PrEP schedule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, Buchbinder S, Lama JR, Guanira JV, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:151ra125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Molina JM, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. What’s the 2+1+1? Event-driven oral pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV for men who have sex with men: Update to WHO’s recommendation on oral PrEP. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/what-s-the-2-1-1-event-driven-oral-pre-exposure-prophylaxis-to-prevent-hiv-for-men-who-have-sex-with-men. Accessed 22 July 2022.

  4. UNAIDS. 2025 AIDS targets. 2021. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/topics/2025_target_setting. Accessed 6 July 2023.

  5. Saberi P, Scott HM. On-demand oral pre-exposure prophylaxis with tenofovir/emtricitabine: what every clinician needs to know. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1285–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyer L, van den Elshout MAM, Achterbergh RCA, Matser A, Schim van der Loeff MF, Davidovich U, et al. Understanding pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) regimen use: switching and discontinuing daily and event-driven PrEP among men who have sex with men. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29–30:100650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Consultation on PrEP adherence: meeting report, June 2014. 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/145706. Accessed 22 July 2022.

  8. Bavinton BR, Grulich AE. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: scaling up for impact now and in the future. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6:e528–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR, Baeten JM, Curran K, Koechlin F, Amico KR, et al. Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm. AIDS. 2015;29:1277–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hendrickson C, Long L, van de Vijver D, Boucher C, O’Bra H, Claassen CW, et al. Novel metric for evaluating pre-exposure prophylaxis programme effectiveness in real-world settings. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e294–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwan TH, Lui GCY, Lam TTN, Lee KCK, Wong NS, Chan DPC, et al. Comparison between daily and on-demand PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) regimen in covering condomless anal intercourse for men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: a randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover trial. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24:e25795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bavinton BR, Vaccher S, Jin F, Prestage GP, Holt M, Zablotska-Manos IB, et al. High levels of prevention-effective adherence to HIV PrEP: an analysis of substudy data from the EPIC-NSW trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;87:1040–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu HJ, Wen-Wei KuS, Chang HH, Li CW, Ko NY, Strong C. Imperfect adherence in real life: a prevention-effective perspective on adherence to daily and event-driven HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men—a prospective cohort study in Taiwan. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24:e25733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Haberer JE, Kidoguchi L, Heffron R, Mugo N, Bukusi E, Katabira E, et al. Alignment of adherence and risk for HIV acquisition in a demonstration project of pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV serodiscordant couples in Kenya and Uganda: a prospective analysis of prevention-effective adherence. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20:21842.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooney EE, Reisner SL, Saleem HT, Althoff KN, Beckham SW, Radix A, et al. Prevention-effective adherence trajectories among transgender women indicated for PrEP in the United States: a prospective cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2022;70:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Virtual AIDS Office of Hong Kong—HIV surveillance reports. 2023. Available from: https://www.aids.gov.hk/english/surveillance/off_surreport.html. Accessed 3 July 2023.

  17. Scientific Committee on AIDS and STI, Hong Kong SAR Government. Guidance on the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Hong Kong. 2022. Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/guidance_on_prep_use_in_hk_aug_2022.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2023.

  18. Wong NS, Kwan TH, Chan DPC, Lui GCY, Lee SS. Regular testing of HIV/STI with self-collected samples from multi-anatomic sites for sexual health monitoring in men who have sex with men: a pilot study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(11):e40996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann HM, Eekman SW, Achterbergh RC, Schim van der Loeff MF, Prins M, de Vries HJ, et al. Motives for choosing, switching and stopping daily or event-driven pre-exposure prophylaxis—a qualitative analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22:e25389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Philpot SP, Murphy D, Chan C, Haire B, Fraser D, Grulich AE, Bavinton BR. Switching to non-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay and bisexual men in Australia: implications for improving knowledge, safety, and uptake. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2022;19:1979–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reyniers T, Nöstlinger C, Laga M, De Baetselier I, Crucitti T, Wouters K, et al. Choosing between daily and event-driven pre-exposure prophylaxis: results of a Belgian PrEP demonstration project. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Xu JJ, Wang HY, Huang XJ, Chen YK, Wang H, et al. Preference for daily versus on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV and correlates among men who have sex with men: the China real-world oral PrEP demonstration study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24:e25667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerras JM, Hoyos Miller J, Agustí C, Chanos S, Pichon F, Kuske M, et al. Association of sexualized drug use patterns with HIV/STI transmission risk in an internet sample of men who have sex with men from seven European countries. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50:461–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong NS, Kwan TH, Lee KCK, Lau JYC, Lee SS. Delineation of chemsex patterns of men who have sex with men in association with their sexual networks and linkage to HIV prevention. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;75:102591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wray TB, Chan PA, Kahler CW, Simpanen EM, Liu T, Mayer KH. Vulnerable periods: characterizing patterns of sexual risk and substance use during lapses in adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80:276–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Reyniers T, Rotsaert A, Thunissen E, Buffel V, Masquillier C, Van Landeghem E, et al. Reduced sexual contacts with non-steady partners and less PrEP use among MSM in Belgium during the first weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown: results of an online survey. Sex Transm Infect. 2021;97:414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Levy I, Michael S, Olmer L, Gofen R, Davidson O, Zooker R, et al. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on men having sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2022.2049197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong N, Lee K, Lui G, Chung S, Chan D, Kwan T. PrEP service utilization during COVID-19 epidemic in Hong Kong. Reviews in antiviral therapy & infectious diseases 3, 2021. Abstract 19. https://academicmedicaleducation.com/meeting/apacc-2021/abstract/prep-service-utilization-during-covid-19-epidemic-hong-kong.

  29. Gillespie D, Couzens Z, de Bruin M, Hughes DA, Jones A, Ma R, et al. PrEP use, sexual behaviour, and PrEP adherence among men who have sex with men living in Wales prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 2022;26:2746–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gilead Sciences for the study drug donation. We thank the staff of the AIDS Concern, AIDS Foundation, C.H.O.I.C.E., Blessed Ministry Community Church, Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs Association of Hong Kong, Integrated Treatment Centre of the Department of Health, Princess Margaret Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, and Social Hygiene Clinic in the referral of potential participants. We thank Mr. CY Poon and Ms. KY So for their assistance in the laboratory work, Mr. CQ Ye and Ms. Mandy Li for project coordination and assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by the Council for the AIDS Trust Fund (MSS325R), Hong Kong. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SSL, GC-YL, KC-KL, THK, DP-CC, and NSW designed and implemented the study. NSW conducted all analyses. SSL and NSW wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed, made critical recommendations, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shui Shan Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

SSL has served as a member of the Advisory Boards of Merck, GSK and Gilead Sciences, and received grants, drug donation and sponsorship for conference participation from Gilead Sciences. GL has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur and GSK, speaker for Merck and Gilead, and has received research grants from Gilead, Merck, Janssen and GSK. NSW has received a research grant and sponsorship for conference participation from Gilead.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, N.S., Chan, D.PC., Kwan, T.H. et al. Dynamicity of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Usage Pattern and Association with Executed Adherence in MSM: An Implementation Study in Hong Kong. AIDS Behav 28, 1327–1344 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04167-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04167-0

Keywords

Navigation