Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 1982 Medicaid Funding Cessation for Circumcision in California and Circumcision Rates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated California’s 1982 decision to stop funding Medicaid neonatal circumcision. We examined male neonatal circumcision rates for those born 1977–1981 and 1983–1987 by region, race, and insurance status. Overall, West-Medicaid circumcision rates decreased from 56.5% in 1979-81 to 26.7% in 1983-85. California’s 1982 decision to defund Medicaid circumcision coverage was associated with a 25.0-30.8% point decrease in West-Medicaid circumcision rates compared other groups, p < 0.01. This provides the earliest data to support that funding coverage for neonatal circumcision affects circumcision rates and magnifies healthcare disparities. Other states have since defunded Medicaid male neonatal circumcision. Circumcision have been associated with lower rates of sexually transmitted infections including HIV, and urinary tract infections. Lawmakers should consider re-funding Medicaid male neonatal circumcision.

Resumen

La cesación de financiamiento por Medicaid en 1982 para la circuncisión y el impacto de su tasa en California.

Aquí investigamos la decisión del gobierno de California en 1982 de dejar de financiar la circuncisión neonatal por Medicaid. Examinamos las tasas de circuncisión neonatal masculina para los nacidos entre 1977 a 1981 y entre 1983 a 1987 por región, raza y estatus de seguro médico. En general, las tasas de circuncisión de West-Medicaid disminuyeron 56.5% en 1979-81 a 26.7% en 1983-85. La decisión de California en 1982 de desfinanciar la cobertura de circuncisión por Medicaid se asoció con una disminución de 25.0 a 30.8 puntos porcentuales en las tasas de circuncisión de West-Medicaid en comparación con otros grupos, p < 0.01. Esto provee los primeros datos que demuestra la cobertura de financiamiento para la circuncisión neonatal afecta las tasas de circuncisión y aumenta las disparidades en cuidado médico. Desde entonces, otros estados han desfinanciado la circuncisión neonatal masculina por Medicaid. La circuncisión se ha asociado con tasas más bajas de infecciones de transmisión sexual, incluyendo el VIH, e infecciones del tracto urinario. Los legisladores deberían considerar refinanciar la circuncisión neonatal masculina por Medicaid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability (data transparency)

Upon request.

Code Availability

Upon request.

References

  1. Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, To TT. Cost analysis of neonatal circumcision in a large health maintenance organization. The Journal of Urology. 2006 Mar 1;175(3):1111-5.

  2. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2007 Feb;24(9562):643–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2007 Feb;24(9562):657–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Kong X, et al. The effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention and effects on risk behaviors in a post-trial follow up study in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS (London, England). 2012 Mar 3;26(5):609.

  6. Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1298–309.

  7. Auvert B, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Cutler E, et al. Effect of male circumcision on the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in young men: results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Orange Farm, South Africa. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009 Jan 1;199(1):14 – 9.

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV. surveillance report. 2018. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 May; 31.

  9. The global HIV/AIDS epidemic [Internet]. Kaiser Family KFF Foundation; 2020 [cited 2021Feb4]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-global-hivaids-epidemic/.

  10. Warner L, Ghanem KG, Newman DR, Macaluso M, Sullivan PS, Erbelding EJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection among heterosexual African American men attending Baltimore sexually transmitted disease clinics. J Infect Dis. 2009 Jan;199(1)(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreiss JK, Hopkins SG. The association between circumcision status and human immunodeficiency virus infection among homosexual men. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1993 Dec 1;168(6):1404-8.

  12. Buchbinder SP, Vittinghoff E, Heagerty PJ, et al. Sexual risk, nitrite inhalant use, and lack of circumcision associated with HIV seroconversion in men who have sex with men in the United States. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2005 May 1;39(1):82 – 9.

  13. Wiswell TE, Enzenauer RW, Holton ME, Cornish JD, Hankins CT. Declining frequency of circumcision: implications for changes in the absolute incidence and male to female sex ratio of urinary tract infections in early infancy. Pediatrics. 1987 Mar;79(3):338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenberg ML, Galusha D, Kennedy WA, Cullen MR. The relationship between neonatal circumcision, urinary tract infection, and health. World J Men’s Health. 2018 Sep;36(3):176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Larke NL, Thomas SL, dos Santos Silva I, Weiss HA. Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes & Control. 2011 Aug;22(8):1097–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Births financed by Medicaid [Internet]. Kaiser Family KFF Foundation; 2019 [cited 2021Feb4]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/births-financed-by-medicaid/.

  17. Zambrano Navia M, Jacobson DL, Balmert LC, et al. State-level public insurance coverage and neonatal circumcision rates. Pediatrics. 2020 Nov 1;146(5).

  18. Leibowitz AA, Desmond K, Belin T. Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):138–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Products - vital statistics of the US - homepage [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [cited 2021Dec13]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm.

  20. Waskett JH. Hospital discharge data underestimate circumcision rates. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2007 Aug 1;34(8):624.

  21. Xu F, Markowitz LE, Sternberg MR, Aral SO. Prevalence of circumcision and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in men in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2004. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Jul;1:479–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leibowitz AA, Desmond K. Infant male circumcision and future health disparities. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2012 Oct 1;166(10):962-3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Amanda Bowes, Lindsay Dawson, Angela Hernandez, Joseph Prejean, and Anna Satcher Johnson for their help with this project. We thank Dean Winslow, Donna Zulman, and Ezra Golberstein for their review of the manuscript.

Funding

University of Kansas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RYL contributed to the data sourcing and interpretation. RW contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation. DS oversaw the project, including statistical analysis and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J.G. Slusky.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing Interests (include appropriate disclosures)

None.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linfield, R.Y., Wendling, R. & Slusky, D.J. The 1982 Medicaid Funding Cessation for Circumcision in California and Circumcision Rates. AIDS Behav 27, 1647–1652 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03896-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03896-y

Keywords

Navigation