Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness and Acceptability of Undetectable = Untransmittable Among a U.S. National Sample of HIV-Negative Sexual and Gender Minorities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the “Undetectable = Untransmittable” (U=U) message is widely endorsed, little is known about its breadth and reach. Our study describes socio-demographic characteristics and sexual behaviors associated with having heard of and trusting in U =U in a U.S. national sample of HIV-negative participants. Data were derived from the Together 5,000 cohort study, an internet-based U.S. national cohort of cis men, trans men and trans women who have sex with men. Approximately 6 months after enrollment, participants completed an optional survey included in the present cross-sectional analysis (n = 3286). Measures included socio-demographic and healthcare-related characteristics; questions pertaining to knowledge of and trust in U=U (dependable variable). We used descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic models to identify characteristics associated with these variables and explored patterns in willingness to engage in condomless anal sex (CAS) with regard to trust in U=U. In total, 85.5% of participants reported having heard of U=U. Among those aware of U=U, 42.3% indicated they trusted it, 19.8% did not, and 38.0% were unsure about it. Latinx, Asian, lower income, and Southern participants were less likely to have heard of U=U. Having had a recent clinical discussion about PrEP or being a former-PrEP user were associated with trust in U=U. Willingness to engage in CAS was positively associated with trust in U=U, and varied based on the partner’s serostatus, PrEP use and viral load. Although we found high rates of awareness and low levels of distrust, our study indicated that key communities remain unaware and/or skeptical of U=U.

Resumen

Mientras que el mensaje de “Indetectable=Intransmisible” (I=I) es ampliamente respaldado, poco se conoce acerca de su alcance y amplitud. Nuestro estudio describe características socio-demográficas y los comportamientos sexuales asociados con haber escuchado de y confiar en I=I en una muestra nacional Estadounidense de participantes VIH-negativos. Los datos se derivaron de Together 5,000, un estudio cohorte en donde se recopiló datos de un cohorte basado en internet de hombres cis, hombres trans y mujeres trans que tienen sexo con otros hombres. Aproximadamente 6 meses después de la inscripción, los participantes completaron una encuesta opcional cuyos datos son presentados en este análisis transversal (n = 3286). Los instrumentos incluyeron características socio-demografías y relacionadas al cuidado de la salud; preguntas pertinentes al conocimiento de y confianza en I=I (variable dependiente). Usamos estadísticas descriptivas y modelos logísticos multivariables para identificar características asociadas a estas variables y exploramos los patrones en la disposición a participar de sexo anal sin condones (CAS) con respecto a la confianza en I=I. En total, 85.5% de los participantes reportaron haber escuchado de I=I. Entre esos, 42.3% indicó que confiaban en el mensaje, 19.8% no confiaban, y 38.0% estaban inseguros. Los participantes latinx, asiáticos, de bajos recursos y del sur tenían menos probabilidad de haber escuchado de I=I. El haber tenido una discusión clínica reciente sobre PrEP o el ser un ex usuario de PrEP se asociaron con la confianza en I=I. La disposición a participar de CAS se asoció positivamente con la confianza en I=I, y varió en función del estado serológico de las parejas, el uso de PrEP y la carga viral. Aunque encontramos altas tasas de conciencia y bajos niveles de desconfianza, nuestro estudio indicó que comunidades clave siguen sin conocer y/o escépticas de I=I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collaboration H-C. The effect of combined antiretroviral therapy on the overall mortality of HIV-infected individuals. AIDS (London, England). 2010;24(1):123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vernazza P, Hirschel B, Bernasconi E, Flepp M. Les personnes séropositives ne souffrant d’aucune autre MST et suivant un traitement antirétroviral efficace ne transmettent pas le VIH par voie sexuelle. Bulletin des médecins suisses| Schweizerische Ärztezeitung| Bollettino dei medici svizzeri. 2008;89(5):165–9.

  4. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):830–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, Van Lunzen J, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2016;316(2):171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bavinton BR, Pinto AN, Phanuphak N, Grinsztejn B, Prestage GP, Zablotska-Manos IB, et al. Viral suppression and HIV transmission in serodiscordant male couples: an international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(8):e438–e447447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prevention Access Campaign. Risk of Sexual Transmission of HIV from a Person Living with HIV Who Has an Undetectable Viral Load: Messaging Primer & Consensus Statement 2016 [Available from: https://www.preventionaccess.org/consensus.

  8. McCray E, Mermin JH. Dear Colleague: September 27, 2017. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017.

  9. Eisinger RW, Dieffenbach CW, Fauci AS. HIV viral load and transmissibility of HIV infection: undetectable equals untransmittable. JAMA. 2019;321(5):451–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prevention Access Campaign. Community Partners 2020 [Available from: https://www.preventionaccess.org/community.

  11. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rendina HJ, Parsons JT. Factors associated with perceived accuracy of the Undetectable= Untransmittable slogan among men who have sex with men: Implications for messaging scale-up and implementation. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(1):e25055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrato EH, Rabin B, Proctor J, Cicutto LC, Battaglia CT, Lambert-Kerzner A, et al. Bringing it home: expanding the local reach of dissemination and implementation training via a university-based workshop. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baltimore City Health Deparment. Our Stories - UU 2020 [Available from: https://www.uequalsumaryland.org/our-stories/.

  15. The Well project. Undetectable Equal Unstrasmittable: Building Hope and Ending HIV Stigma 2020 [Available from: https://www.thewellproject.org/hiv-information/undetectable-equals-untransmittable-building-hope-and-ending-hiv-stigma.

  16. Grov C, Westmoreland DA, Carneiro PB, Stief M, MacCrate C, Mirzayi C, et al. Recruiting vulnerable populations to participate in HIV prevention research: findings from the Together 5000 cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;35:4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nash D, Stief M, MacCrate C, Mirzayi C, Patel VV, Hoover D, Pantalone DW, Golub S, Millett G, D’Angelo AB, Westmoreland DA. A web-based study of HIV prevention in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis among vulnerable HIV-negative gay and bisexual men, transmen, and transwomen who have sex with men: Protocol for an observational cohort study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(9):e13715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. SAS Institute Incorporated. SAS 9.4 ed. Cary, NC 2013.

  19. CDC. Trends in US HIV diagnoses, 2005–2014. Fact Sheet. 2016.

  20. King MF, Bruner GC. Social desirability bias: a neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychol Market. 2000;17(2):79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khosropour CM, Sullivan PS. Predictors of retention in an online follow-up study of men who have sex with men. Journal of medical Internet research. 2011;13(3).

  22. Sharma A, Sullivan PS, Khosropour CM. Willingness to take a free home HIV test and associated factors among internet-using men who have sex with men. J Int Assoc Phys AIDS Care. 2011;10(6):357–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to additional members of the T5K study team: Denis Nash, David Pantalone, Sarit A. Golub, Gregorio Millett, Don Hoover, Sarah Kulkarni, Matthew Stief, Alexa D’Angelo, Chloe Mirzayi, Corey Morrison, Fatima Zohra, & Javier Lopez-Rios. Thank you to the members of our Scientific Advisory Board: Adam Carrico, Michael Camacho, Demetre Daskalakis, Sabina Hirshfield, Jeremiah Johnson, Claude Mellins, and Milo Santos. And thank you to the program staff at NIH: Gerald Sharp, Sonia Lee, and Michael Stirratt. While the NIH financially supported this research, the content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect official views of the NIH. We also like to thank the anonymous reviewer who provided indispensable commentary that helped shape the interpretation of our results.

Funding

Together 5,000 was funded by the National Institutes for Health (UG3 AI 133675—PI Grov). Viraj Patel was supported by a career development award (K23MH102118). Other forms of support include the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, the Einstein-Rockefeller-CUNY Center for AIDS Research (ERC CFAR, P30 AI124414).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Grov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carneiro, P.B., Westmoreland, D.A., Patel, V.V. et al. Awareness and Acceptability of Undetectable = Untransmittable Among a U.S. National Sample of HIV-Negative Sexual and Gender Minorities. AIDS Behav 25, 634–644 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02990-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02990-3

Keywords

Navigation