Sex Partner Behavior Variation Related to Network Position of and Residential Proximity to Sex Partners Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men

Abstract

This analysis examines how sex behaviors are influenced by a sex partner’s network bridging position and the residential proximity between the two. The study sample consisted of 437 young black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) in Chicago and their sex partners (2013–2014). Dyadic analyses that clustered on individuals using generalized estimating equations (n = 1095 relationships) were conducted to assess the associations between different HIV-related sexual behaviors and the network position of and residential proximity to a partner. The odds of group sex was higher with partners who had high network bridging, regardless of how close they lived to one another. The odds of transactional sex was higher with partners who had high network bridging and lived in a different region of the city. Sex behaviors associated with an increased risk of HIV transmission were associated with the network structural position of and residential proximity to partners among YBMSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    CDC. HIV infection risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men—national HIV behavioral surveillance, 20 U.S. cities, 2014. HIV Surveillance Special Report. 2016;15.

  2. 2.

    Sullivan PS, Rosenberg ES, Sanchez TH, Kelley CF, Luisi N, Cooper HL, et al. Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 198425(6):(6): p. 445–454.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL, Wilson PA, et al. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management. 2003;21(5):501–348.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management. 2005;14(15):2083–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tieu H-V, Koblin BA, Latkin C, Curriero FC, Greene ER, Rundle A, et al. Neighborhood and network characteristics and the HIV care continuum among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0266-2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bauermeister JA, Connochie D, Eaton L, Demers M, Stephenson R. Geospatial indicators of space and place: a review of multilevel studies of HIV prevention and care outcomes among young men who have sex with men in the United States. J Sex Res. 2017;54(4–5):446–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schneider J, Cornwell B, Ostrow D, Michaels S, Schumm P, Laumann EO, et al. Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):e28–e36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen Y-T, Kolak M, Duncan DT, Schumm P, Michaels S, Fujimoto K, et al. Neighbourhoods, networks and pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness: a multilevel analysis of a sample of young black men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053639.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schneider J, Cornwell B, Jonas A, Lancki N, Behler R, Skaathun B, et al. A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics. 2016;171(2):116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hurt CB, Matthews DD, Calabria MS, Green KA, Adimora AA, Golin CE, et al. Sex with older partners is associated with primary HIV infection among men who have sex with men in North Carolina. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54(2):185.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tieu H-V, Liu T-Y, Hussen S, Connor M, Wang L, Buchbinder S, et al. Sexual networks and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men in 6 US cities. PLoS ONE ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schneider JA, Zhou AN, Laumann EO. A new HIV prevention network approach: sociometric peer change agent selection. Soc Sci Med. 2015;125:192–202.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Skaathun B, Voisin DR, Cornwell B, Lauderdale DS, Schneider JA. A longitudinal examination of factors associated with network bridging among YMSM: implications for HIV prevention. AIDS Behav. 2018;23(5):1326–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Morgan E, Skaathun B, Duvoisin R, Michaels S, Schneider JA. Are HIV seroconversions among young men who have sex with men associated with social network proximity to recently or long-term HIV-infected individuals? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(2):128–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Khanna AS, Goodreau SM, Michaels S, Schneider JA. Using partially-observed Facebook networks to develop a peer-based HIV prevention intervention: case study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(9):e11652.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Valente TW, Fujimoto K. Bridging: locating critical connectors in a network. Soc Netw. 2010;32(3):212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Young LE, Schumm P, Alon L, Bouris A, Ferreira M, Hill B, et al. PrEP Chicago: a randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among young Black men who have sex with men. Clin Trials. 2017;15(1):44–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Burt RS. Soc Netw. 2010;24(4):333–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Laumann EO, Ellingson SE, Mahay JE, Paik AE, Youm YE. The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zenilman JM, Ellish N, Fresia A, Glass G. The geography of sexual partnerships in Baltimore: applications of core theory dynamics using a geographic information system. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(2):75–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Youm Y, Laumann EO. Social network effects on the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(11):689–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fujimoto K, Williams ML, Ross MW. A network analysis of relationship dynamics in sexual dyads as correlates of HIV risk misperceptions among high-risk MSM. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;91(2):130–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    United States Census Bureau. 2005–2009 American community survey 5-year estimates. Washington, DC; 2011.

  24. 24.

    Chicago Department of Public Health. HIV/STI surveillance report. 2018.

  25. 25.

    Burt RS. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In: Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS, editors. Social capital: theory and research. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Burt RS. Reinforced structural holes. Soc Netw. 2015;43:149–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jacobs S, Khanna A, Madduri K, Bader D. InfluenceR: software tools to quantify structural importance of nodes in a network. 2015. https://github.com/rcc-uchicago/influenceR.

  28. 28.

    Bauermeister J, Eaton L, Stephenson R. A multilevel analysis of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transactional sex with casual partners among young men who have sex with men living in metro Detroit. Behav Med. 2016;42(3):(3):197–18–204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bond KT, Yoon IS, Houang ST, Downing MJ, Grov C, Hirshfield S. Transactional sex, substance use, and sexual risk: comparing pay direction for an internet-based U.S. sample of men who have sex with men. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2019;16:255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ. Transactional sex and the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM): results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(12):(12):2177–204–2183.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Newcomb ME, Mongrella MC, Weis B, McMillen SJ, Mustanski B. Partner disclosure of PrEP use and undetectable viral load on geosocial networking apps: frequency of disclosure and decisions about condomless sex. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(2):200–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rich AJ, Lachowsky NJ, Cui Z, Sereda P, Lal A, Moore DM, et al. Event-level analysis of anal sex roles and sex drug use among gay and bisexual men in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(6):1443–511.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the uConnect study participants for the time they contributed to this study. We would also like to thank the staff for the collection of the data. This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health [Grant Numbers: R01 DA033875, R01 MH112406, R01 DA039934]. The funding sources did not have involvement in the development of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yen-Tyng Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YT., Issema, R.S., Hotton, A. et al. Sex Partner Behavior Variation Related to Network Position of and Residential Proximity to Sex Partners Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav 24, 2327–2335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02792-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Men who have sex with men
  • Sexual behaviors
  • Social network analysis
  • African-American
  • Geography