Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Love with No Exceptions: A Statewide Faith-Based, University–Community Partnership for Faith-Based HIV Training and Assessment of Needs in the Deep South

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This project established a faith-based, university–community partnership with the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church in Alabama to develop a statewide training model to address HIV knowledge and stigma, promote discussion and generate action plans to address HIV in the Deep South. A community-engaged research team consisting of church leadership and university researchers developed and implemented the model, “Love with No Exceptions.” Mixed methods were used to evaluate the model delivered in 3-h sessions in five state regions (N = 146 clergy and laity). The majority of participants reported feeling better prepared to serve those living with or affected by HIV and would implement education and awareness activities in their churches. Participants’ HIV knowledge increased from pre- to post-training. Stigma-related attitudes showed minor changes from baseline. These results reflect that partnerships between academic institutions and churches can deliver promising steps towards impactful HIV education in the Deep South.

Resumen

Este proyecto se basó en una colaboración entre la Universidad de Alabama y la Iglesia Episcopal Metodista Africana (AME) en Alabama para desarrollar un modelo de capacitación en todo el estado para abordar los temas del estigma y del conocimiento sobre el VIH; promover el debate al respecto, y generar planes de acción en el sur de los Estados Unidos. Un equipo de investigación basado en participación comunitaria formado por líderes de la iglesia e investigadores universitarios, desarrolló e implementó el modelo “Amor sin Excepciones”. Se utilizaron métodos mixtos para evaluar el modelo que se administró en sesiones de 3 horas en 5 regiones estatales (n = 146 clérigos y laicado). La mayoría de los participantes informaron que se sentían mejor preparados para servir a las personas que viven con o están afectadas por el VIH y que estarían dispuestos a implementar actividades de educación y sensibilización en sus iglesias. El conocimiento sobre el VIH entre los participantes aumentó después de la capacitación. Las actitudes relacionadas con el estigma mostraron cambios menores comparados con actitudes antes de la intervención. Estos resultados demuestran que las asociaciones entre instituciones académicas e iglesias pueden incrementar la educación sobre el VIH. Los resultados son prometedores y pueden impactar el sur de los Estados Unidos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health and Human Services. U.S. Statistics. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Alabama State Health Profile. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/stateprofiles/pdf/alabama_profile.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  3. Southern AIDS Coalition. HIV/AIDS in Alabama. https://southernaids.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/alabama-hiv-diagnoses-2015-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the Southern United States. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/policies/cdc-hiv-in-the-south-issue-brief.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  5. Abara W, Coleman JD, Fairchild A, Gaddist B, White J. A faith-based community partnership to address HIV/AIDS in the Southern United States: implementation, challenges, and lessons learned. J Relig Health. 2015;54(1):122–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report: diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  7. Alabama Department of Public Health. Brief facts on African-Americans and HIV in Alabama, 2017.

  8. Aral SO, Adimora AA, Fenton KA. Understanding and responding to disparities in HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in African Americans. Lancet. 2008;372(9635):337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nunn A, Cornwall A, Chute N, et al. Keeping the faith: African American faith leaders’ perspectives and recommendations for reducing racial disparities in HIV/AIDS infection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reif S, Safley D, McAllaster C, Wilson E, Whetten K. State of HIV in the US Deep South. J Commun Health. 2017;42(5):844–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malcolm A, Aggleton P, Bronfman M, Galvao J, Mane P, Verrall J. HIV-related stigmatization and discrimination: Its forms and contexts. Crit Public Health. 1998;8(4):347–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein SJ, Karchner WD, O’connell DA. Interventions to prevent HIV-related stigma and discrimination: Findings and recommendations for public health practice. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2002;8(6):44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beaulieu M, Adrien A, Potvin L, Dassa C. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS: validation of a measurement scale. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark HJ, Lindner G, Armistead L, Austin B-J. Stigma, disclosure, and psychological functioning among HIV-infected and non-infected African-American women. Women Health. 2004;38(4):57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yehia BR, Stewart L, Momplaisir F, et al. Barriers and facilitators to patient retention in HIV care. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vyavaharkar M, Moneyham L, Corwin S, Saunders R, Annang L, Tavakoli A. Relationships between stigma, social support, and depression in HIV-infected African American women living in the rural Southeastern United States. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2010;21(2):144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herek GM, Capitanio JP, Widaman KF. HIV-related stigma and knowledge in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1991–1999. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(3):371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman JD, Tate AD, Gaddist B, White J. Social determinants of HIV-related stigma in faith-based organizations. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(3):492–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown L, Macintyre K, Trujillo L. Interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS stigma: what have we learned? AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(1):49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindley LL, Coleman JD, Gaddist BW, White J. Informing faith-based HIV/AIDS interventions: HIV-related knowledge and stigmatizing attitudes at Project FAITH churches in South Carolina. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(1_suppl):12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coughlin SS. Community-based participatory research studies on HIV/AIDS prevention, 2005-2014. Jacobs J Commun Med. 2016;2(1):019.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Foster PP, Bradley EL, Aduloju-Ajijola N, et al. Testing our FAITHH: HIV stigma and knowledge after a faith-based HIV stigma reduction intervention in the Rural South. AIDS Care. 2018;30(2):232–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith J, Simmons E, Mayer KH. HIV/AIDS and the Black Church: what are the barriers to prevention services? J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(12):1682.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Foster PP, Cooper K, Parton JM, Meeks JO. Assessment of HIV/AIDS prevention of rural African American Baptist leaders: implications for effective partnerships for capacity building in American communities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011;103(4):323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffith DM, Campbell B, Allen JO, Robinson KJ, Stewart SK. YOUR Blessed Health: an HIV-prevention program bridging faith and public health communities. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(1):4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. About The Black Church & HIV: the social justice imperative. https://theblackchurchandhiv.org/. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  27. African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church. HALT-2: Leader Training on HIV/AIDS 2016.

  28. Compilation Committee. The Doctrine and Discipline of the African Methodist Episcopal Church. 50th - Bicentenntial ed. Nashville, TN: The AME Sunday School Union; 2016.

  29. Berkley-Patton J, Bowe-Thompson C, Bradley-Ewing A, et al. Taking it to the pews: a CBPR-guided HIV awareness and screening project with black churches. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010;22(3):218–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marcus M, Walker T, Swint JM, et al. Community-based participatory research to prevent substance abuse and HIV/AIDS in African-American adolescents. J Interprof Care. 2004;18(4):347–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carey MP, Schroder KE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(2):172–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wingood G. Diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBI) field guides: archived evaluation field guide & instruments—SISTA pre-test post-test surveys. https://effectiveinterventions.cdc.gov/en/2018-design/home/interventions-previously-supported-by-cdc/sista/EvaluationFieldGuideInstruments.aspx. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

  33. Brown EJ, Williams SE. Southern rural African American faith communities’ role in STI/HIV prevention within two counties: an exploration. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2006;4(3):47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart JM. Pastor and lay leader perceptions of barriers and supports to HIV ministry maintenance in an African American church. J Relig Health. 2014;53(2):317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. AME Church. African Methodist Episcopal Church: The Official Website. https://www.ame-church.com/. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  36. Gerbert B, Sumser J, Maguire BT. The impact of who you know and where you live on opinions about AIDS and health care. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):677–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS PrEP. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prep.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.

  38. Hart W, Albarracin D, Eagly AH, Brechan I, Lindberg MJ, Merrill L. Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(4):555–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Black Church and HIV for their co-sponsorship of the Town Hall. We also thank Dr. Dustin Long, Department of Biostatistics, Center for AIDS Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Amal Alyusuf for their helpful comments on the analysis. We are grateful to the Alabama Ninth Episcopal District of the AME Church, Bishop Harry L. Seawright, and all of the clergy, laity, church members from the AME local churches, as well as our panel participants including medical providers and local HIV organizations and agencies who provided on-site HIV testing, counseling, and HIV resources that were available at all sessions. Further, we wish to express our unwavering love and admiration for the people living and thriving with HIV who spoke at each of the sessions. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of UAB or any other organization.

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Center For AIDS Research CFAR, an NIH funded program (P30 AI027767) that was made possible by the following institutes: NIAID, NCI, NICHD, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, NIA, NIDDK, NIGMS, NIMHD, FIC, NIDCR and OAR and the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Center supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 5U48DP005037 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin G. Lanzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors included on this manuscript declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanzi, R.G., Footman, A.P., Jackson, E. et al. Love with No Exceptions: A Statewide Faith-Based, University–Community Partnership for Faith-Based HIV Training and Assessment of Needs in the Deep South. AIDS Behav 23, 2936–2945 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02604-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02604-7

Keywords

Navigation