World Health Organization. HIV/AIDS. [Web] http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/en/. Accessed 17 Nov 2016.
Põder A, Haldre M. HIV in Europe. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(2):282–5.
Marcus U, et al. Age biases in a large HIV and sexual behavior-related internet survey among MSM. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:826–37.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. HIV and STI prevention among men who have sex with men. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2016.
McCormack SM, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.
Grant RM, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99.
Molina JM, et al. On-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2237–46.
Molina J-M. PrEP roll-out in france, in World AIDS Conference. 2016: Durban, South Africa.
Reyniers T, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for men who have sex with men in Europe: Review of evidence for a much needed prevention tool. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;93:363–7.
Hendrix CW. Development of rectal enema as microbicide (DREAM). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2014.
Collins C. Rectal Microbicides Fact Sheet. 2016.
Leyva FJ, et al. Isoosmolar enemas demonstrate preferential gastrointestinal distribution, safety, and acceptability compared with hyperosmolar and hypoosmolar enemas as a potential delivery vehicle for rectal microbicides. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013;29(11):1487–95.
Hall EW, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis modality preferences among men who have sex with men and use social media in the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e111.
Marra E, Hankins CA. Perceptions among Dutch men who have sex with men and their willingness to use rectal microbicides and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis to reduce HIV risk: a preliminary study. AIDS Care. 2015;27(12):1493–500.
McGowan I, et al. A phase 1 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled rectal safety and acceptability study of tenofovir 1% gel (MTN-007). PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e60147.
McGowan I, et al. Project gel: a randomized rectal microbicide safety and acceptability study in young men and transgender women. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0158310.
Mitchell JW, et al. Anal douche practices and willingness to use a rectal microbicide enema for HIV prevention and associated factors among an internet sample of HIV-negative and HIV-discordant male couples in the US. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:2578–87.
Calabrese SK, et al. An event-level comparison of risk-related sexual practices between black and other-race men who have sex with men: condoms, semen, lubricant, and rectal douching. AIDS Patient Care STD. 2013;27(2):77–84.
Galea JT, et al. Rectal douching prevalence and practices among Peruvian men who have sex with men and transwomen: implications for rectal microbicides. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(11):2555–64.
Noor SW, Rosser BR. Enema use among men who have sex with men: a behavioral epidemiologic study with implications for HIV/STI prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(4):755–69.
Carballo-Diéguez A, et al. The use of rectal douches among HIV-uninfected and infected men who have unprotected receptive anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):860–6.
Chmiel JS, et al. Factors associated with prevalent human immunodeficiency virus infection in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:568–75.
Moss AR, et al. Risk factors for AIDS and HIV seropositivity in homosexual men. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125:1035–47.
Winkelstein W Jr, et al. Sexual practices and risk of infection by the human immunodeficiency virus. The San Francisco Men’s Health Study. JAMA. 1987;257(3):321–5.
Koziol DE, et al. A comparison of risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infections in homosexual men. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3(4):434–41.
Schreeder MT, et al. Hepatitis B in homosexual men: prevalence of infection and factors related to transmission. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(1):7–15.
de Vries HJ, et al. Lymphogranuloma venereum proctitis in men who have sex with men is associated with anal enema use and high-risk behavior. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:203–8.
Macdonald N, et al. Risk factors for rectal lymphogranuloma venereum in gay men: results of a multicentre case-control study in the U.K. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(4):262–8.
Ndimbie OK, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in a male homosexual cohort: risk factor analysis. Genitoruin Med. 1996;72(3):213–6.
Kinsler JJ, et al. Rectal douching among Peruvian men who have sex with men, and acceptability of a douche-formulated rectal microbicide to prevent HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(1):62.
Galea JT, et al. Rectal douching and implications for rectal microbicides among populations vulnerable to HIV in South America: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(1):33–5.
Newman PA, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S. A social ecology of rectal microbicide acceptability among young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(1):18476.
Carballo-Diéguez A, et al. Preference for gel over suppository as delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide: results of a randomised, crossover acceptability trial among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(6):483–7.
Achterbergh R, et al. Is rectal douching and sharing douching equipment associated with anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea? A cross-sectional study among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2016-052777.
Goedel WC, Duncan DT. Geosocial-network app usage patterns of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: survey among users of Grindr, a mobile dating app. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015;1(1):e4.
Landovitz RJ, et al. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles. California. J Urban Health. 2013;90(4):729–39.
Duncan DT, et al. Poor sleep health and its association with mental health, substance use and condomless anal intercourse among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Sleep Health. 2016;2(4):316–21.
Harkness J. Questionnaire translation, in cross-cultural survey methods. In: Harkness J, Van de Vijer F, Moher P, editors. Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003. p. 35–6.
Phillips G, et al. Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington. DC. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1630–7.
Zou H, Fan S. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;46(4):885–94.
Javanbakht M, et al. Prevalence and types of rectal douches used for anal intercourse: results from an inernational survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:95.
Anton PA, et al. RMP-02/MTN-006: a phase 1 rectal safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of tenofovir 1% gel compared with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28(11):1412–21.
Begay O, et al. Identification of personal lubricants that can cause rectal epithelial cell damage and enhance HIV type 1 replication in vitro. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27(9):1019–24.
Rebe KB, et al. Sexual lubricants in South Africa may potentially disrupt mucosal surfaces and increase HIV transmission among men who have sex with men. AS Afr Med J. 2013;104(1):49–51.
Guthmann JP, Fonteneau L, Lévy-Bruhl D. Assessment of vaccination coverage in France: Current sources and data. Saint-Maurice: French Institute for Public Health Surveillance; 2012.
Diez Roux AV. Neighborhoods and health: where are we and where do we go from here? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007;55:13–21.