Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Pharmacy Proximity and Delivery Services on HIV Viral Suppression Among Low Income Urban Patients

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adherence to antiretrovirals is essential to achieve viral suppression in HIV patients. Unfortunately, numerous barriers to adherence and subsequent viral suppression still exist. This study examines the association between pharmacy location and viral suppression for low income HIV patients. We evaluated whether home delivery services or closer proximity to in-store pharmacies was associated with viral suppression. Patients utilizing delivery pharmacy had increased likelihood of sustained viral suppression compared to in-store pharmacy patients (aOR = 3.430). For patients traveling to pharmacies, there were no differences in proximity for suppressed and non-suppressed patients. Home delivery may aid adherence and improve viral suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gunthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV Infection in adults: 2016 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA. 2016;316(2):191–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(6):793–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. ONAP. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States. Updated to 2020. In: Policy OoNA, editor. 2015.

  4. Census Bureau. 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year estimates for Cleveland city, OH. 2008-2012.

  5. CCBH. 2015-2016 Post medicaid and ACA expansion needs assessment report. In: Health CCBo, editor. 2017.

  6. Krummenacher I, Spencer B, Pasquier S, Bugnon O, Cavassini M, Schneider M. Qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators encountered by HIV patients in an ART adherence programme. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(4):716–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sagrestano LM, Clay J, Finerman R, Gooch J, Rapino M. Transportation vulnerability as a barrier to service utilization for HIV-positive individuals. AIDS Care. 2014;26(3):314–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Castelino S, Miah H, Auyeung V, Vogt F. Determination of the influence of home delivery of HIV therapy on virological outcomes and adherence. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(2):93–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iyengar RN, Balagere DS, Henderson RR, LeFrancois AL, Rabbitt RM, Frazee SG. Association between dispensing channel and medication adherence among medicare beneficiaries taking medications to treat diabetes, high blood pressure, or high blood cholesterol. JMCP J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(8):851–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keller S, Yehia BR, Eberhart MG, Brady KA. Accuracy of definitions for linkage to care in persons living with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:622–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nachega JB, Pariente JJ, Uthman OA, et al. Lower pill burden and once-daily antiretroviral treatment regimens for hiv infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):1297–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer L, Bradley H, Mattson CL, et al. Trends in racial and ethnic disparities in antiretroviral therapy prescription and viral suppression in the United States, 2009-2013: Trends in disparities in HIV care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(4):446–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by AIDS Funding Collaborative. The sponsors had no role in study design, data accrual, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. NP and AA were responsible for study concept and design. NP acquired data and SL analyzed data. Drafting of the manuscript was done by NP, AA, and SL. Funding was obtained by AA. All the authors had full and independent access to the data and manuscript and were able to revise drafts and approve of the final version. All authors could vouch for the integrity and accuracy of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Avery.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

NP is a consultant with FundRx. AA declares that she has no conflict of interest. SL declares he has no conflict of interest.

Research involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required. All study procedures were approved by MetroHealth IRB (IRB 11-01458).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, N., Lewis, S. & Avery, A. Impact of Pharmacy Proximity and Delivery Services on HIV Viral Suppression Among Low Income Urban Patients. AIDS Behav 22, 1025–1029 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1823-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1823-5

Keywords

Navigation