Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 3000–3012 | Cite as

Implementation of Evidence-Based HIV Interventions for Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • William L. JeffriesIV
  • Sherese Garrett
  • Miriam Phields
  • Babatunde Olubajo
  • Emily Lemon
  • Raydel Valdés-Salgado
  • Charles B. CollinsJr.
Original Paper

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides trainings to support implementation of five evidence-based HIV prevention interventions (EBIs) for men who have sex with men (MSM): d-up: Defend Yourself!; Many Men, Many Voices; Mpowerment; Personalized Cognitive Counseling; and Popular Opinion Leader. We evaluated trainees’ implementation of these EBIs and, using multivariable logistic regression, examined factors associated with implementation. Approximately 43% of trainees had implemented the EBIs for which they received training. Implementation was associated with working in community-based organizations (vs. health departments or other settings); acquiring training for Mpowerment or Popular Opinion Leader (vs. Personalized Cognitive Counseling); having ≥3 funding sources (vs. one); and having (vs. not having) sufficient time and necessary EBI resources. Findings suggest that implementation may vary by trainee characteristics, especially those related to employment setting, EBI training, funding, and perceived implementation barriers. Efforts that address these factors may help to improve EBI implementation among trainees.

Keywords

HIV Men who have sex with men Evidence-based intervention Implementation Training Evaluation 

Resumen

Los Centros para el Control y Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC, por sus siglas en inglés) proveen entrenamiento para apoyar la implementación de cinco intervenciones basadas en la evidencia para la prevención del VIH entre hombres que tienen sexo con hombres: d-up: Defend Yourself!; Many Men, Many Voices; Mpowerment; Personalized Cognitive Counseling; y Popular Opinion Leader. Nosotros evaluamos la implementación de esas intervenciones por parte de quienes recibieron entrenamiento y examinamos los factores asociados con la implementación, para lo cual usamos regresión logística multivariada. Aproximadamente 43% de los participantes habían implementado la intervención para la cual fueron entrenados. La implementación se asoció con trabajar en organizaciones comunitarias (vs. departamentos de salud u otras organizaciones); haber recibido los entrenamientos Mpowerment o Popular Opinion Leader (vs. Personalized Cognitive Counseling); tener ≥3 fuentes de financiamiento (vs. una); y tener (vs. no tener) suficiente tiempo y los recursos necesarios para la intervención. Los resultados sugieren que la implementación de las intervenciones puede variar según las características de los participantes, específicamente su lugar de empleo, intervención para la que fueron entrenados, financiamiento y las barreras percibidas para la implementación. Los esfuerzos para abordar esos factores puedieran ayudar a que los participantes implementen las intervenciones basadas en la evidencia para las que fueron entrenados.

Palabras Clave

VIH hombres que tienen sexo con hombres intervenciones basadas en la evidencia implementación entrenamiento evaluación 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Grace J. Hall, Ph.D., MPH and Christopher H. Johnson, M.S. for helpful comments regarding project conceptualization and data analyses.

Funding

This evaluation was funded by CDC (Contract #200-2011-41314).

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this evaluation were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the evaluation.

References

  1. 1.
    Purcell DW, Johnson CH, Lansky A, et al. Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the united states to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. Open AIDS J. 2012;6(1):98–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report: diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2015. 2016; https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  3. 3.
    Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(5):520–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in U.S. HIV Diagnoses, 2005–2014. 2016; http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/hiv-data-trends-fact-sheet-508.pdf. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  5. 5.
    Arreola S, Santos GM, Beck J, et al. Sexual stigma, criminalization, investment, and access to HIV services among men who have sex with men worldwide. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(2):227–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. EffectiveInterventions: HIV prevention that works. 2016; https://effectiveinterventions.cdc.gov/. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  7. 7.
    Rausch DM, Grossman CI, Erbelding EJ. Integrating behavioral and biomedical research in HIV interventions: challenges and opportunities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:S6–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins CB, Sapiano TN. Lessons learned from dissemination of evidence-based interventions for HIV prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51:S140–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Compendium of evidence-based interventions and best practices for HIV prevention. 2016; http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/research/interventionresearch/compendium/index.html. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  10. 10.
    Dilley JW, Woods WJ, Loeb L, et al. Brief cognitive counseling with HIV testing to reduce sexual risk among men who have sex with men: results from a randomized controlled trial using paraprofessional counselors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(5):569–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dilley JW, Woods WJ, Sabatino J, et al. Changing sexual behavior among gay male repeat testers for HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30(2):177–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilton L, Herbst J, Coury-Doniger P, et al. Efficacy of an HIV/STI prevention intervention for black men who have sex with men: findings from the Many Men. Many Voices project. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):532–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(2):168–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones KT, Gray P, Whiteside YO, et al. Evaluation of an HIV prevention intervention adapted for black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1043–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kegeles SM, Hays RB, Coates TJ. The Mpowerment Project: a community-level HIV prevention intervention for young gay men. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1129–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cunningham SD, Card JJ. Realities of replication: implementation of evidence-based interventions for HIV prevention in real-world settings. Implement Sci. 2014;9(5):1–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kegeles SM, Rebchook G, Pollack L, et al. An intervention to help community-based organizations implement an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention: the Mpowerment Project technology exchange system. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1–2):182–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly JA, Somlai AM, DiFranceisco WJ, et al. Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(7):1082–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stephenson R, Grabbe KL, Sidibe T, McWilliams A, Sullivan PS. Technical assistance needs for successful implementation of couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) intervention for male couples at US HIV testing sites. AIDS Behav. 2015;20:841–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witte SS, Wu E, El-Bassel N, et al. Implementation of a couple-based HIV prevention program: a cluster randomized trial comparing manual versus web-based approaches. Implement Sci. 2014;9:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. High-impact HIV prevention: CDC’s approach to reducing HIV infections in the United States. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dolcini MM, Gandelman AA, Vogan SA, et al. Translating HIV interventions into practice: community-based organizations’ experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs). Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(10):1839–46.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kegeles SM, Rebchook G, Tebbetts S, Arnold E. Facilitators and barriers to effective scale-up of an evidence-based multilevel HIV prevention intervention. Implement Sci. 2015;10(50):1–17.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Owczarzak J, Dickson-Gomez J. Provider perspectives on evidence-based HIV prevention interventions: barriers and facilitators to implementation. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2011;25(3):171–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chillag K, Bartholow K, Cordeiro J, et al. Factors affecting the delivery of HIV/AIDS prevention programs by community-based organizations. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(3 Suppl A):27–37.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National HIV prevention program monitoring & evaluation for CDC directly funded community-based organizations: overview and data collection guidance. 2012; https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/funding/announcements/ps11-1113/cdc-hiv-ps11-1113-nhme-cdc-directlyfundedcbosoverviewcollectionguidance.pdf. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  28. 28.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention annual report 2014: closing the gaps in HIV prevention & care. 2016; http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/policies/cdc-hiv-2014-dhap-annual-report.pdf. Accessed 03/15/2017.
  29. 29.
    The White House. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States: updated to 2020. 2015; https://www.aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas-update.pdf. Accessed 03/15/2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • William L. JeffriesIV
    • 1
  • Sherese Garrett
    • 2
  • Miriam Phields
    • 1
  • Babatunde Olubajo
    • 2
  • Emily Lemon
    • 2
  • Raydel Valdés-Salgado
    • 3
  • Charles B. CollinsJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of HIV/AIDS PreventionNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)AtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Population Health Sciences DivisionSciMetrika, LLCAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Population Health Sciences DivisionSciMetrika, LLCSilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations