Gender, HIV Testing and Stigma: The Association of HIV Testing Behaviors and Community-Level and Individual-Level Stigma in Rural South Africa Differ for Men and Women
- 1k Downloads
Stigma remains a significant barrier to HIV testing in South Africa. Despite being a social construct, most HIV-stigma research focuses on individuals; further the intersection of gender, testing and stigma is yet to be fully explored. We examined the relationship between anticipated stigma at individual and community levels and recent testing using a population-based sample (n = 1126) in Mpumalanga, South Africa. We used multi-level regression to estimate the potential effect of reducing community-level stigma on testing uptake using the g-computation algorithm. Men tested less frequently (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.14–0.33) and reported more anticipated stigma (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.6–10.1) than women. For men only, testing was higher among those reporting no stigma versus some (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.97–2.03; p = 0.07). For women only, each percentage point reduction in community-level stigma, the likelihood of testing increased by 3% (p < 0.01). Programming should consider stigma reduction in the context of social norms and gender to tailor activities appropriately.
KeywordsHIV Stigma South Africa Rural Community Gender
We would like to thank the research participants for their time and willingness to share information about their lives. We are deeply appreciative of the study staff, the community liaison office (LINC) staff, and data collection team whose hard work made this research possible, especially Amanda Selin, Rushina Cholera and Sheree Schwartz. We also thank Eric Vittinghoff for his assistance with programming the statistical analysis.
This work was supported by the United States National Institute of Mental Health under Grant 1R01MH087118-01 (Pettifor) and Grant 1R21MH090887-01 (Lippman). The Agincourt HDSS is supported by the Wellcome Trust, UK under Grants 058893/Z/99/A; 069683/Z/02/Z; 085477/Z/08/Z; 085477/B/08/Z; the South African Medical Research Council; and the University of Witwatersrand.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Sarah Treves-Kagan, Alison M. El Ayadi, Audrey Pettifor, Catherine MacPhail, Suzanne Maman, Dean Peacock, Kathleen Kahn, and Sheri A. Lippman declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and the University of California, San Francisco, and the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.World Health Organization. Prevalence of HIV among adults aged 15 to 49, estimates by country. 2013.Google Scholar
- 2.World Health Organization. Number of deaths due to HIV/AIDS, estimates by country. 2013.Google Scholar
- 3.South Africa National Department of Health. National consolidated guidelines for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) and the management of HIV in children, adolescents and adults. Pretoria: National Department of Health; 2015.Google Scholar
- 4.World Health Organization. Global update on HIV treatment 2013: results, impact and opportunities. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 6.Shisana ORT, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Zungu N, Labadarios D, Onoya D, et al. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 21.Treves-Kagan S, Steward WT, Ntswane L, Haller R, Gilvydis JM, Gulati H, Barnhart S, Lippman SA. Why increasing availability of ART is not enough: a rapid, community-based study on how HIV-related stigma impacts engagement to care in rural South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1.Google Scholar
- 29.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. Geneva: WHO Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- 30.Pettifor A, Lippman SA, Selin AM, Peacock D, Gottert A, Maman S, Rebombo D, Suchindran CM, Twine R, Lancaster K, Daniel T. A cluster randomized-controlled trial of a community mobilization intervention to change gender norms and reduce HIV risk in rural South Africa: study design and intervention. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):752.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pearl J. Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 43.Barker G, Ricardo C. Young men and the construction of masculinity in Sub-Saharan Africa: implications for HIV/AIDS, conflict and violence. The Workd Bank; 2005.Google Scholar
- 47.Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
- 57.Auerbach JD, Parkhurst JO, Caceres CF. Addressing social drivers of HIV/AIDS for the long-term response: conceptual and methodological considerations. Glob Public Health 2011; 6(Sup 3): S293–S309.Google Scholar
- 60.Chan BT, Tsai AC, Siedner MJ. Has anti-retroviral treatment scale-up in sub-Saharan Africa reduced HIV-related stigma in the general population? A cross-country analysis. Seattle: conference on retroviruses and opportunistic Infections; 2015.Google Scholar
- 62.Kabudula CW, and Gómez-Olivé, F.X. VCT service use at the primary health care units in Agincourt sub-district, rural South Africa (2006–2009). South Africa: MRC/wits rural public health and health transitions research unit, agincourt health and demographic surveillance system; 2010.Google Scholar