AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 3279–3286 | Cite as

The Where and How for Reaching Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men with HIV Prevention Services in Guatemala

  • William M. Miller
  • William C. Miller
  • Clare Barrington
  • Sharon S. Weir
  • Sanny Y. Chen
  • Michael E. Emch
  • Audrey E. Pettifor
  • Gabriela Paz-Bailey
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aims to describe the transgender women and men who have sex with men (MSM) missed through venue-based sampling and illustrate how data on venues can be used to prioritize service delivery. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and time-location sampling (TLS) were used concurrently in 2010 for behavioral surveillance among MSM and transgender women in Guatemala City. RDS recruits who did not frequent venues (n = 106) were compared to TLS recruits (n = 609). TLS participants recruited at different types of venues were compared. RDS recruits who did not frequent venues were less educated, less likely to identify as gay, more likely to have concurrent partners and female sexual partners. Participants recruited at NGOs, saunas, hotels, streets and parks had more partners, were more likely to receive money for sex or have concurrent partners. Prevention programs for MSM and transgender women should characterize social venues and people that frequent them and improve service coverage through venues and social networks.

Keywords

HIV MSM Surveillance HIV prevention RDS TLS 

Resumen

El estudio tiene como objetivo describir la población de mujeres transgénero y hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH) no alcanzada a través de muestreo por tiempo-lugar e ilustrar cómo utilizar los datos referentes a los puntos de encuentro para priorizar la prestación de servicios de prevención del VIH. En 2010 se implementaron en paralelo el muestreo dirigido por los participantes (RDS) y el muestreo de tiempo-lugar (TLS) para la vigilancia del comportamiento entre los HSH y mujeres trans en la Ciudad de Guatemala. Se compararon el comportamiento sexual y el acceso a servicios de prevención entre participantes de RDS que no frecuentaban puntos de encuentro (n = 106) y participantes de TLS (n = 609). Tambien se hizo la comparación entre los participantes de TLS reclutados en diferentes tipos de sitios. Los participantes de RDS que no frecuentaron sitios de reunión presentaron un menor nivel educativo, una menor probabilidad de identificarse como gay y ser más propensos a tener parejas concurrentes y parejas sexuales femeninas. Los participantes reclutados en las ONG, las saunas, hoteles, calles y parques tenían más parejas, eran más propensos a recibir dinero por sexo o tener parejas concurrentes. Los programas de prevención para los HSH y mujeres trans deben caracterizar los sitios de encuentro y a las personas que los frecuentan y mejorar la cobertura de los servicios a través de los sitios y redes sociales.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank institutions and venue owners involved in the conduct of this study. The authors recognize the contribution of the field staff and technical consultants: Berta Alvarez, Nelson Arambu, Flor de Maria Hernandez, Jose Manuel Aguilar, Sabrina Boyce, Andres Alvarado, Sonia Morales Miranda, Jessica España, Norma Zuniga and Cesar Galindo.

Funding

This study was carried out in collaboration with Tephinet Inc. and the HIV Unit of the Center of Health Studies from the Universidad del Valle de Guatemala and supported by the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under the terms of Cooperative Agreements SD43GH000014-05 and GH0000575. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4(12):e339.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baral SD, Poteat T, Stromdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(3):214–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller WM, Buckingham L, Sanchez-Dominguez MS, Morales-Miranda S, Paz-Bailey G. Systematic review of HIV prevalence studies among key populations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(Suppl 1):S65–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morales-Miranda S, Álvarez-Rodríguez B, Arambú N, Aguilar-Martínez J, Huamán Zevallos B, Figueroa W, et al. Encuesta de Vigilancia de Comportamiento Sexual y Prevalencia del VIH e ITS, en poblaciones vulnerables y poblaciones clave. Guatemala 2013: Universidad del Valle Guatemala, MSPAS, HIVOS Inc., septiembre 2013 Publicacion UVG No. 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steen R, Hontelez JA, Veraart A, White RG, de Vlas SJ. Looking upstream to prevent HIV transmission: can interventions with sex workers alter the course of HIV epidemics in Africa as they did in Asia? AIDS. 2014;28(6):891–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Binson D, Woods WJ, Pollack L, Paul J, Stall R, Catania JA. Differential HIV risk in bathhouses and public cruising areas. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(9):1482–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stanekova D, Kramarova P, Wimmerova S, Habekova M, Takacova M, Mojzesova M. HIV and risk behaviour among men who have sex with men in Slovakia (2008–2009). Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014;22(4):239–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan H, Ding Y, Wong FY, Ning Z, Zheng T, Nehl EJ, et al. Epidemiological and molecular characteristics of HIV infection among money boys and general men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. Infect Genet Evol J Mol Epidemiol Evol Genet Infect Dis. 2015;31:135–41.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holland CE, Papworth E, Billong SC, Tamoufe U, LeBreton M, Kamla A, et al. Antiretroviral treatment coverage for men who have sex with men and female sex workers living with HIV in Cameroon. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(Suppl 2):S232–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Firestone R, Rivas J, Lungo S, Cabrera A, Ruether S, Wheeler J, et al. Effectiveness of a combination prevention strategy for HIV risk reduction with men who have sex with men in Central America: a mid-term evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo Y, Zhu C, Chen S, Geng Q, Fu R, Li X, et al. Risk factors for HIV and syphilis infection among male sex workers who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study in Hangzhou, China, 2011. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holland CE, Papworth E, Billong SC, Kassegne S, Petitbon F, Mondoleba V, et al. Access to HIV services at non-governmental and community-based organizations among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Cameroon: an integrated biological and behavioral surveillance analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0122881.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barrington C, Wejnert C, Guardado ME, Nieto AI, Bailey GP. Social network characteristics and HIV vulnerability among transgender persons in San Salvador: identifying opportunities for HIV prevention strategies. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(1):214–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inciardi JA, Surratt J, Felles RR, et al. Sex, drugs, and the culture of transvestimo in Rio de Janeiro. In: Bockting W, Kirk S, editors. Transgender and HIV: risks, prevention and care. New York: Haworth Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clements-Nolle K, Wilkinson W, Kitano K, Marx R. HIV prevention and health service needs of the transgender community in San Francisco. In: Bockting W, Kirk S, editors. Transgender and HIV: risks, prevention and care Binghamton. NY: Haworth Press, Inc.; 2001. p. 69–89.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Operario D, Nemoto T, Iwamoto M, Moore T. Unprotected sexual behavior and HIV risk in the context of primary partnerships for transgender women. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(3):674–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Murrill C, Guilin V, Dean L. Risk behaviors and psychosocial stressors in the new york city house ball community: a comparison of men and transgender women who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(2):351–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paz-Bailey G, Miller W, Shiraishi RW, Jacobson JO, Abimbola TO, Chen SY. Reaching men who have sex with men: a comparison of respondent-driven sampling and time-location sampling in Guatemala City. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):3081–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burt RD, Thiede H. Evaluating consistency in repeat surveys of injection drug users recruited by respondent-driven sampling in the Seattle area: results from the NHBS-IDU1 and NHBS-IDU2 surveys. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):354–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burt RD, Thiede H. Assessing differences in groups randomized by recruitment chain in a respondent-driven sample of Seattle-area injection drug users. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(11):861–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCreesh N, Frost SD, Seeley J, Katongole J, Tarsh MN, Ndunguse R, et al. Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling. Epidemiology. 2012;23(1):138–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wei C, McFarland W, Colfax GN, Fuqua V, Raymond HF. Reaching black men who have sex with men: a comparison between respondent-driven sampling and time-location sampling. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(8):622–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kendall C, Kerr LR, Gondim RC, Werneck GL, Macena RH, Pontes MK, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(4 Suppl):S97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao J, Cai R, Chen L, Cai W, Yang Z, Richardus JH, et al. A comparison between respondent-driven sampling and time-location sampling among men who have sex with men in Shenzhen, China. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):2055–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lau JT, Lin C, Hao C, Wu X, Gu J. Public health challenges of the emerging HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in China. Public Health. 2011;125(5):260–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang H, Hao C, Huan X, Yan H, Guan W, Xu X, et al. HIV incidence and associated factors in a cohort of men who have sex with men in Nanjing, China. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(4):208–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng L, Ding X, Lu R, Liu J, Sy A, Ouyang L, et al. High HIV prevalence detected in 2006 and 2007 among men who have sex with men in China’s largest municipality: an alarming epidemic in Chongqing, China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(1):79–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hong FC, Zhou H, Cai YM, Pan P, Feng TJ, Liu XL, et al. Prevalence of syphilis and HIV infections among men who have sex with men from different settings in Shenzhen, China: implications for HIV/STD surveillance. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85(1):42–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thiede H, Jenkins RA, Carey JW, Hutcheson R, Thomas KK, Stall RD, et al. Determinants of recent HIV infection among Seattle-area men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 1):S157–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao J, Chen L, Cai WD, Tan JG, Tan W, Zheng CL, et al. HIV infection and sexual behaviors among non-commercial men who have sex with men at different venues. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(4):801–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fuqua V, Chen YH, Packer T, Dowling T, Ick TO, Nguyen B, et al. Using social networks to reach Black MSM for HIV testing and linkage to care. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(2):256–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vargo S, Agronick G, O’Donnell L, Stueve A. Using peer recruitment and OraSure to increase HIV testing. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(1):29–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Latkin CA, Davey-Rothwell MA, Knowlton AR, Alexander KA, Williams CT, Boodram B. Social network approaches to recruitment, HIV prevention, medical care, and medication adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(Suppl 1):S54–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kabakchieva E, McAuliffe TL, Vassileva S. Evaluation of a social network HIV prevention intervention program for young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(3):205–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kabakchieva E, Kirsanova AV, Vassileva S, Takacs J, et al. A randomized social network HIV prevention trial with young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS. 2005;19(16):1897–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weir SS, Pailman C, Mahlalela X, Coetzee N, Meidany F, Boerma JT. From people to places: focusing AIDS prevention efforts where it matters most. AIDS. 2003;17(6):895–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stahlman S, Johnston LG, Yah C, Ketende S, Maziya S, Trapence G, et al. Respondent-driven sampling as a recruitment method for men who have sex with men in southern sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional analysis by wave. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92(4):292–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William M. Miller
    • 1
  • William C. Miller
    • 1
    • 2
  • Clare Barrington
    • 3
    • 4
  • Sharon S. Weir
    • 1
    • 4
  • Sanny Y. Chen
    • 5
  • Michael E. Emch
    • 1
    • 4
    • 6
  • Audrey E. Pettifor
    • 1
    • 4
  • Gabriela Paz-Bailey
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Division of Global HIV/AIDSCenters for Disease Control and Prevention – Central America Regional OfficeGuatemala CityGuatemala
  6. 6.Department of GeographyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  7. 7.Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (TEPHINET) Central American OfficeGuatemala CityGuatemala

Personalised recommendations