Skip to main content
Log in

Vengeance, Condomless Sex and HIV Disclosure Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vengeance has been shown to be a risk factor for HIV nondisclosure. Research examining the associations between vengeance, condomless sex, and HIV nondisclosure is lacking. The aim of the current study was to explore the association between vengeance, condomless sex and disclosure (behavior, attitude and intention) among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV. Participants included 266 MSM who were a part of a disclosure intervention study. Men were recruited from local and state AIDS service organizations (ASOs), HIV-related venues and forums, and at local eating and drinking establishments in Tampa, Florida, and Columbus and Dayton, Ohio metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Advertisements were also placed in local daily newspapers. Vengeance was operationalized into three groups based on percentiles (least, more, and most vengeful) and as a continuous variable. Crude and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between vengeance and condomless sex in the past 30 days. Simple and multiple linear regression models were used to determine the association between vengeance and HIV disclosure. After adjusting for demographic and geographic characteristics, participants who were “most vengeful” had, on average, an approximate six-point decrease (β: −5.46; 95% CI −9.55, −1.36) in disclosure intention compared to MSM who were “least vengeful.” Prevention and intervention programs geared towards improving disclosure among MSM should address vengeance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabriel MA, Monaco GW. “Getting even”: clinical considerations of adaptive and maladaptive vengeance. Clin Soc Work J. 1994;22:165–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Socarides CW. On vengeance: the desire to “get even”. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1966;14:356–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Satici SA, Uysal R, Akin A. Forgiveness and vengeance: the mediating role of gratitude. Psychol Rep. 2014;114:157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cota-Mckinley AL, Woody WD, Bell PA. Vengeance: effects of gender, age, and religious background. Aggress Behav. 2001;27:343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elshout M, Nelissen RM, van Beest I. Vengeance is self-focused: comparing vengeful to anger-driven responses. Cogn Emot. 2015;29:1239–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stuckless N, Goranson R. The vengeance scale: development of a measure of attitudes toward revenge. J Soc Behav Personal. 1992;7:25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moskowitz DA, Roloff ME. Vengeance, HIV disclosure, and perceived HIV transmission to others. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:721–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bingman CR, Marks G, Crepaz N. Attributions about one’s HIV infection and unsafe sex in seropositive men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2001;5:283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wickens CM, Wiesenthal DL, Roseborough JE. Personality predictors of driver vengeance. Violence Vict. 2015;30:148–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fromm E. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walster E, Walster GW, Berschied E. Equity: theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Austin W, Walster E. Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1974;30:208–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Austin W, Walster E. Particpants’ reactions to equity with the world. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1974;10:528–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Austin W, Walster E. Equity with the world: an investigation of the trans-relational effects of equity and inequity. Sociometry. 1975;38:474–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards-Jackson N, Phanuphak N, Van Tieu H, et al. HIV serostatus disclosure is not associated with safer sexual behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) and their partners at risk for infection in Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS Res Ther. 2012;9:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown MJ, Serovich JM, Kimberly JA, et al. Disclosure and self-efficacy among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29:625–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dankoli RS, Aliyu AA, Nsubuga P, et al. HIV disclosure status and factors among adult HIV positive patients in a secondary health facility in North-Eastern Nigeria, 2011. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18(Suppl 1):4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Altman D. Categorizing continuous variables. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown RP. Vengeance is mine: narcissism, vengeance, and the tendency to forgive. J Res Personal. 2004;38:576–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walster E, Traupmann J, Walster GW. Equity and extramarital sexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 1978;7:127–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neal TM, Lichtenstein B, Brodsky SL. Clinical implications of stigma in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21:158–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the men who participated in the study.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082639).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monique J. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Monique J. Brown, Julianne M. Serovich, Judy A. Kimberly, and Jinxiang Hu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, M.J., Serovich, J.M., Kimberly, J.A. et al. Vengeance, Condomless Sex and HIV Disclosure Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 21, 2650–2658 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1645-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1645-x

Keywords

Navigation