Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 2659–2669 | Cite as

Drug use Discrimination Predicts Formation of High-Risk Social Networks: Examining Social Pathways of Discrimination

  • Natalie D. Crawford
  • Chandra Ford
  • Abby Rudolph
  • BoRin Kim
  • Crystal M. Lewis
Original Paper

Abstract

Experiences of discrimination, or social marginalization and ostracism, may lead to the formation of social networks characterized by inequality. For example, those who experience discrimination may be more likely to develop drug use and sexual partnerships with others who are at increased risk for HIV compared to those without experiences of discrimination. This is critical as engaging in risk behaviors with others who are more likely to be HIV positive can increase one’s risk of HIV. We used log-binomial regression models to examine the relationship between drug use, racial and incarceration discrimination with changes in the composition of one’s risk network among 502 persons who use drugs. We examined both absolute and proportional changes with respect to sex partners, drug use partners, and injecting partners, after accounting for individual risk behaviors. At baseline, participants were predominately male (70%), black or Latino (91%), un-married (85%), and used crack (64%). Among those followed-up (67%), having experienced discrimination due to drug use was significantly related to increases in the absolute number of sex networks and drug networks over time. No types of discrimination were related to changes in the proportion of high-risk network members. Discrimination may increase one’s risk of HIV acquisition by leading them to preferentially form risk relationships with higher-risk individuals, thereby perpetuating racial and ethnic inequities in HIV. Future social network studies and behavioral interventions should consider whether social discrimination plays a role in HIV transmission.

Keywords

HIV Social networks Discrimination Substance use Racial/ethnic inequities 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 019964-01). The authors also thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars program for its financial support. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the HIV/AIDS Substance Use Training and Trauma Program. Finally, the authors would like to thank the START staff and participants for their invaluable contributions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of the New York Academy of Medicine and Columbia University Medical Center.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(5):250–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raymond HF, McFarland W. Racial mixing and HIV risk among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):630–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Johnson DF, Secura GM, MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA. The effect of partner characteristics on HIV infection among African American men who have sex with men in the Young Men’s Survey, Los Angeles, 1999–2000. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(1 Suppl A):39–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with hiv prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):526–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latkin CA, Kuramoto SJ, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. Social norms, social networks, and HIV risk behavior among injection drug users. AIDS Behav. 2009;14(5):1159–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman SR, Aral S. Social networks, risk-potential networks, health, and disease. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):411–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, Sherman S. Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(3):465–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latkin CA, Hua W, Forman VL. The relationship between social network characteristics and exchanging sex for drugs or money among drug users in Baltimore, MD, USA. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14(11):770–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mustanski B, Birkett M, Kuhns LM, Latkin CA, Muth SQ. The role of geographic and network factors in racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: an egocentric network study. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):1037–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sullivan PS, Rosenberg ES, Sanchez TH, et al. Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25(6):445–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharmeen F, Arentze T, Timmermans H. Predicting the evolution of social networks with life cycle events. Transportation (Amst). 2015;42(5):733–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DiMaggio P, Garip F. How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. Am J Sociol. 2011;116(6):1887–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kadushin C. Social networks and inequality: how facebook contributes to economic (and other) inequality. 2012. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/understanding-social-networks/201203/social-networks-and-inequality.
  15. 15.
    Kreek MJ. Extreme marginalization: addiction and other mental health disorders, stigma, and imprisonment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1231:65–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones C. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmed AT, Mohammed SA, Williams DR. Racial discrimination & health: pathways & evidence. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(4):318–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams DR, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS. Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(2):200–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hallfors DD, Iritani BJ, Miller WC, Bauer DJ. Sexual and drug behavior patterns and HIV and STD racial disparities: the need for new directions. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:125–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brondolo E, Brady Ver Halen N, Pencille M, Beatty D, Contrada RJ. Coping with racism: a selective review of the literature and a theoretical and methodological critique. J Behav Med. 2009;32(1):64–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):1026–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crawford ND, Ford C, Galea S, Latkin C, Jones KC, Fuller CM. The relationship between perceived discrimination and high-risk social ties among illicit drug users in New York City, 2006–2009. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:419–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eng PM, Rimm EB, Fitzmaurice G, Kawachi I. Social ties and change in social ties in relation to subsequent total and cause-specific mortality and coronary heart disease incidence in men. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(8):700–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cornwell B, Laumann EO. The health benefits of network growth: new evidence from a national survey of older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2015;125:94–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    de la Haye K, Green HD Jr, Pollard MS, Kennedy DP, Tucker JS. Befriending risky peers: factors driving adolescents’ selection of friends with similar marijuana use. J Youth Adolesc. 2015;44(10):1914–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dingle GA, Stark C, Cruwys T, Best D. Breaking good: breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. Br J Soc Psychol. 2015;54(2):236–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stuber J, Galea S, Ahern J, Blaney S, Fuller C. The association between multiple domains of discrimination and self-assessed health: a multilevel analysis of Latinos and blacks in four low-income New York city neighborhoods. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(6 Pt 2):1735–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young M, Stuber J, Ahern J, Galea S. Interpersonal discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 2005;31(3):371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rudolph AE, Crawford ND, Latkin C, et al. Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21:280–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rudolph AE, Crawford ND, Latkin C, et al. Individual, study, and neighborhood level characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users in New York city: optimizing respondent driven sampling. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1097–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rudolph AE, Young AM, Lewis CF. Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York city. J Urban Health. 2015;92(2):352–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(8):1390–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. Critical race theory, race equity, and public health: toward antiracism praxis. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl 1):S30–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ford CL, Miller WC, Smurzynski M, Leone PA. Key components of a theory-guided HIV prevention outreach model: pre-outreach preparation, community assessment, and a network of key informants. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(2):173–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rudolph AE, Latkin C, Crawford ND, Jones KC, Fuller CM. Does respondent driven sampling alter the social network composition and health-seeking behaviors of illicit drug users followed prospectively? PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Anthony JC, Vlahov D, Celentano D, Menon AS, Margolick J, Cohn S. Self-report interview data for a study of HIV-1 infection among intravenous drug users: description of methods and preliminary evidence on validity. J Drug Issues. 1991;21(4):739–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vlahov D, Anthony JC, Celentano D, Solomon L, Chowdhury N. Trends of HIV-1 risk reduction among initiates into intravenous drug use 1982–1987. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 1991;17(1):39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee L, McKenna M, Sharpe T. HIV diagnoses among injection-drug users in states with HIV surveillance–25 states, 1994–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(27):634–6.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ahern J, Stuber J, Galea S. Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(2–3):188–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU, et al. The composite international diagnostic interview. An epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(12):1069–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rudolph AE, Crawford ND, Latkin C, et al. Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(4):280–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2249–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Knowlton A, Hua W, Latkin C. Social support among HIV positive injection drug users: implications to integrated intervention for HIV positives. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(4):357–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ford CL, Daniel M, Earp JA, Kaufman JS, Golin CE, Miller WC. Perceived everyday racism, residential segregation, and HIV testing among patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 1):S137–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rothenberg R. Maintenance of endemicity in urban environments: a hypothesis linking risk, network structure and geography. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(1):10–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rothenberg R, Muth SQ, Malone S, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE. Social and geographic distance in HIV risk. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(8):506–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Crawford ND, Borrell L, Ford C, Galea S, Latkin C, Link B, Fuller C. Neighborhood differences in the relationship between discrimination and high-risk social networks among illicit drug users. J Commun Health. 2013;38(2):328–37.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Des Jarlais DC, et al. Social intervention against AIDS among injecting drug users. Br J Addict. 1992;87(3):393–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie D. Crawford
    • 1
  • Chandra Ford
    • 2
  • Abby Rudolph
    • 3
  • BoRin Kim
    • 4
  • Crystal M. Lewis
    • 5
  1. 1.Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  4. 4.College of Health and Human ServicesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Division of Social Solutions and Services Research, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchNew York State Office of Mental HealthLathamUSA

Personalised recommendations