AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 703–711 | Cite as

Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Integrating HIV and Nutrition Service Delivery: Pilots in Malawi and Mozambique

  • Julie N. Bergmann
  • Kenneth Legins
  • Tin Tin Sint
  • Sarah Snidal
  • UNICEF Research Group
  • Yanis Ben Amor
  • Gordon C. McCord
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper provides the first estimates of impact and cost-effectiveness for integrated HIV and nutrition service delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. HIV and undernutrition are synergistic co-epidemics impacting millions of children throughout the region. To alleviate this co-epidemic, UNICEF supported small-scale pilot programs in Malawi and Mozambique that integrated HIV and nutrition service delivery. We use trends from integration sites and comparison sites to estimate the number of lives saved, infections averted and/or undernutrition cases cured due to programmatic activities, and to estimate cost-effectiveness. Results suggest that Malawi’s program had a cost-effectiveness of $11–29/DALY, while Mozambique’s was $16–59/DALY. Some components were more effective than others ($1–4/DALY for Malawi’s Male motivators vs. $179/DALY for Mozambique’s One stop shops). These results suggest that integrating HIV and nutrition programming leads to a positive impact on health outcomes and should motivate additional work to evaluate impact and determine cost-effectiveness using an appropriate research design.

Keywords

HIV Nutrition Integration Service delivery Cost-effectiveness Sub-Saharan Africa 

Resumen

Este documento proporciona las primeras estimaciones del impacto y la relación costo-eficacia de la prestación integrada de servicios de VIH y nutrición en África subsahariana. El VIH y la desnutrición son coepidemias sinérgicas que afectan a millones de niños en toda la región. En un esfuerzo por aliviar esta co-epidemia, UNICEF apoyó la ejecución de programas piloto a pequeña escala en Malawi y Mozambique integrando la prestación de servicios de VIH y nutrición. Utilizamos las tendencias en los sitios de integración y sitios de comparación para estimar el número de vidas salvadas, el número de infecciones prevenidas y/o casos de desnutrición curados debido a las actividades programáticas, y estimamos la rentabilidad. Los resultados sugieren que el programa integrado de Malawi tuvo una costo-eficacia de $11–29 por AVAD, mientras que el de Mozambique fue de $16–59 por AVAD. Algunos componentes fueron más efectivos que otros ($1–4 por AVAD para el programa “Hombres Motivadores” de Malawi vs. $179 por AVAD del programa “Ventanillas Únicas” de Mozambique). Los resultados sugieren que la integración de programas de VIH y de nutrición tiene un impacto positivo sobre la salud y motivan más trabajo para evaluar el impacto y determinar costo-eficacia usando un diseño de investigación apropiado.

Supplementary material

10461_2016_1400_MOESM1_ESM.docx (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 89 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    UNICEF. The AIDS epidemic continues to take a staggering toll, especially in sub–Saharan Africa 2015 [cited 2015 February 17, 2015]. Available from: http://data.unicef.org/hiv–aids/global–trends.
  2. 2.
    Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low–income and middle–income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anema A, Vogenthaler N, Frongillo EA, Kadiyala S, Weiser SD. Food insecurity and HIV/AIDS: current knowledge, gaps, and research priorities. Curr HIV/AIDS Reports. 2009;6(4):224–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saloojee H, De Maayer T, Garenne ML, Kahn K. What’s new? Investigating risk factors for severe childhood malnutrition in a high HIV prevalence South African setting1. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(69 suppl):96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins S, Dent N, Binns P, Bahwere P, Sadler K, Hallam A. Management of severe acute malnutrition in children. Lancet. 2006;368(9551):1992–2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Musoke PM, Fergusson P. Severe malnutrition and metabolic complications of HIV–infected children in the antiretroviral era: clinical care and management in resource–limited settings. American J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6):1716S–20S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim MH, Cox C, Dave A, Draper HR, Kabue M, Schutze GE, et al. Prompt initiation of ART With therapeutic food is associated with improved outcomes in HIV–infected Malawian children with malnutrition. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(2):173–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trehan I, O’Hare BA, Phiri A, Heikens GT. Challenges in the management of HIV–infected malnourished children in sub–Saharan Africa. AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:790786. doi:10.1155/2012/790786.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WHO. Malawi: Neonatal and child health country profile. 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dube Q, Dow A, Chirambo C, Lebov J, Tenthani L, Moore M, et al. Implementing early infant diagnosis of HIV infection at the primary care level: experiences and challenges in Malawi. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(9):699–704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    WHO. Mozambique: Neonatal and Child Health Profile. 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Republic of Mozambique MoH, UNICEF, CHAI. Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV in Mozambique: Progress Report January 2009–December 2011. 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CIA. The World Factbook: Physician Density 2012 [July 24, 2015]. Available from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the–world–factbook/fields/2226.html.
  14. 14.
    Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1(2):e114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuznik A, Lamorde M, Hermans S, Castelnuovo B, Auerbach B, Semeere A, et al. Evaluating the cost–effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of mother–to–child transmission of HIV in Uganda. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(8):595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    WHO. Global Burden of Disease 2004 Update: Disability Weights For Diseases And Conditions. 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fasawe O, Avila C, Shaffer N, Schouten E, Chimbwandira F, Hoos D, et al. Cost–effectiveness analysis of option B+ for HIV prevention and treatment of mothers and children in Malawi. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57778.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adam T, Lim SS, Mehta S, Bhutta ZA, Fogstad H, Mathai M, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goodman C, Coleman P, Mills A. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 1999;354(9176):378–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puett C, Sadler K, Alderman H, Coates J, Fiedler JL, Myatt M. Cost–effectiveness of the community–based management of severe acute malnutrition by community health workers in southern Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(4):386–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sweat MD, O’Reilly KR, Schmid GP, Denison J, de Zoysa I. Cost–effectiveness of nevirapine to prevent mother–to–child HIV transmission in eight African countries. AIDS. 2004;18(12):1661–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie N. Bergmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth Legins
    • 3
  • Tin Tin Sint
    • 3
  • Sarah Snidal
    • 4
  • UNICEF Research Group
  • Yanis Ben Amor
    • 5
  • Gordon C. McCord
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of Global Public Health, Department of MedicineUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Public HealthSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.United Nations Children’s FundNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.LifeNet InternationalGlobal Health CorpsKampalaUganda
  5. 5.Center for Sustainable Development, The Earth InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.School of Global Policy and StrategyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations