Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimates of CDC-Funded and National HIV Diagnoses: A Comparison by Demographic and HIV-related Factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether CDC-funded HIV testing programs are reaching persons disproportionately affected by HIV infection. The percentage distribution for HIV testing and diagnoses by demographics and transmission risk group (diagnoses only) were calculated using 2013 data from CDC’s National HIV Surveillance System and CDC’s national HIV testing program data. In 2013, nearly 3.2 million CDC-funded tests were provided to persons aged 13 years and older. Among persons who received a CDC-funded test, 41.1 % were aged 20–29 years; 49.2 % were male, 46.2 % were black/African American, and 56.2 % of the tests were conducted in the South. Compared with the characteristics of all persons diagnosed with HIV in the United States in 2013, among persons diagnosed as a result of CDC-funded tests, a higher percentage were aged 20–29 years (40.3 vs 33.7 %) and black/African American (55.3 vs 46.0 %). CDC-funded HIV testing programs are reaching young people and blacks/African Americans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 Dependent Areas—2013. 2015;20(2). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/. Accessed 31 Dec 2015.

  2. Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen R. Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen R. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(4):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Skarbinski J, Rosenberg E, Paz-Bailey G, Hall HI, Rose CE, Viall AH, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission at each step of the care continuum in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:588–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2013; vol 25. Atlanta, GA. February 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/. Accessed 31 Dec 2015.

  7. U. S. Census Bureau. Total Population 2013 [December 16,2015]. Available from: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_13_1YR_S0101&prodType=table.

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV testing at CDC funded sites United States, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, 2011. Atlanta, GA: 2013.

  9. Harrison KM, Kajese T, Hall HI, Song R. Risk factor redistribution of the national HIV/AIDS surveillance data: an alternative approach. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(5):618–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson AS, Beer L, Sionean C, Hu X, Furlow-Parmley C, Le B, et al. HIV infection - United States, 2008 and 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62(Suppl 3):112–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e17502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. An Q, Prejean J, Hall HI. Racial disparity in U.S. diagnoses of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, 2000–2009. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):461–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inungu J, Lewis A, Mustafa Y, Wood J, O’Brien S, Verdun D. HIV testing among adolescents and youth in the United States: update from the 2009 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Open AIDS J. 2011;5:80–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Committee on Pediatric AIDS, Emmanuel PJ, Martinez J. Adolescents and HIV infection: the pediatrician’s role in promoting routine testing. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):1023–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stigma and Discrimination: National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; 2010 [updated March 10, 2015; cited 2015 March 16th]. http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/stigma-and-discrimination.htm.

  16. Latkin CA, Vlahov D. Socially desirable response tendency as a correlate of accuracy of self-reported HIV serostatus for HIV seropositive injection drug users. Addiction. 1998;93(8):1191–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the participating health department and localities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Krueger.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krueger, A., Dietz, P., Van Handel, M. et al. Estimates of CDC-Funded and National HIV Diagnoses: A Comparison by Demographic and HIV-related Factors. AIDS Behav 20, 2961–2965 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1293-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1293-1

Keywords

Navigation