Skip to main content

Distal and Proximal Influences on Men’s Intentions to Resist Condoms: Alcohol, Sexual Aggression History, Impulsivity, and Social-Cognitive Factors

AIDS and Behavior volume 20, pages 147–157 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent scientific evidence demonstrates that many young men commonly resist condom use with their female sex partners and that both alcohol intoxication and a history of sexual aggression may increase the risk of condom use resistance (CUR). Using a community sample of heterosexual male non-problem drinkers with elevated sexual risk (N = 311), this alcohol administration study examined the direct and indirect effects of intoxication and sexual aggression history on men’s CUR intentions through a sexual risk analogue. State impulsivity, CUR-related attitudes, and CUR-related self-efficacy were assessed as mediators. Results demonstrated that alcohol intoxication directly increased CUR intentions, and sexual aggression history both directly and indirectly increased CUR intentions. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both alcohol use and sexual aggression in risky sex prevention programs, as well as indicate the continued worth of research regarding the intersection of men’s alcohol use, sexual aggression, and sexual risk behaviors, especially CUR.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Analyses were also conducted using the traditional coding scheme of “most severe assault perpetrated.” The pattern of results did not differ between the two SES scoring methods.

References

  1. Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, Dunne EF, Mahajan R, Ocfemia MCB, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(3):187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance [Internet]. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014 [cited 2015 Jan 14]. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats13/default.htm.

  3. Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med. 2010;7(Suppl 5):266–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis KC, Stappenbeck CA, Norris J, George WH, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Schraufnagel TJ, et al. Young men’s condom use resistance tactics: a latent profile analysis. J Sex Res. 2014;51(4):454–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowleg L, Lucas KJ, Tschann JM. “The ball was always in his court”: an exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychol Women Q. 2004;28(1):70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy SB, Nolen S, Applewhite J, Waiter E. Urban African-American males’ perceptions of condom use, gender and power, and HIV/STD prevention program. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(12):1395–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Teitelman AM, Tennille J, Bohinski JM, Jemmott LS, Jemmott JBI. Unwanted unprotected sex: condom coercion by male partners and self-silencing of condom negotiation among adolescent girls. Adv Nurs Sci. 2011;34(3):243–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Measor L. Condom use: a culture of resistance. Sex Educ. 2006;6(4):393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis KC, Schraufnagel TJ, Kajumulo KF, Gilmore AK, Norris J, George WH. A qualitative examination of men’s condom use attitudes and resistance: “It’s just part of the game”. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(3):631–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peasant C, Parra GR, Okwumabua TM. Condom negotiation: findings and future directions. J Sex Res. 2015;52(4):470–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(1):142–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehm J, Shield KD, Joharchi N, Shuper PA. Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2012;107(1):51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2009;14(1):22–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wingrove J, Bond AJ. Impulsivity: a state as well as trait variable. Does mood awareness explain low correlations between trait and behavioural measures of impulsivity? Personal Individ Differ. 1997;22(3):333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dougherty DM, Marsh-Richard DM, Hatzis ES, Nouvion SO, Mathias CW. A test of alcohol dose effects on multiple behavioral measures of impulsivity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96(1–2):111–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Derefinko KJ, Peters JR, Eisenlohr-Moul TA, Walsh EC, Adams ZW, Lynam DR. Relations between trait impulsivity, behavioral impulsivity, physiological arousal, and risky sexual behavior among young men. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(6):1149–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbey A, Parkhill MR, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Saenz C. Alcohol’s role in men’s use of coercion to obtain unprotected sex. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(9–10):1329–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Purdie MP, Abbey A, Jacques-Tiura AJ. Perpetrators of intimate partner sexual violence: are there unique characteristics associated with making partners have sex without a condom? Violence Women. 2010;16(10):1086–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raj A, Santana MC, La Marche A, Amaro H, Cranston K, Silverman JG. Perpetration of intimate partner violence associated with sexual risk behaviors among young adult men. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(10):1873–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lisak D, Roth S. Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1988;55(5):795–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petty GM, Dawson B. Sexual aggression in normal men: incidence, beliefs, and personality characteristics. Personal Individ Differ. 1989;10(3):355–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spence JT, Losoff M, Robbins AS. Sexually aggressive tactics in dating relationships: personality and attitudinal correlates. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1991;10(3):289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingree JB, Thompson M. A comparison of risk factors for alcohol-involved and alcohol-uninvolved sexual aggression. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(9):1478–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pokorny AD, Miller BA, Kaplan HB. The brief MAST: a shortened version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Am J Psychiatry. 1972;129(3):342–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Friel PN, Logan BK, O’Malley D, Baer JS. Development of dosing guidelines for reaching selected target breath alcohol concentrations. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;60(4):555–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohsenow DJ, Marlatt GA. The balanced placebo design: methodological considerations. Addict Behav. 1981;6(2):107–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pihl RO, Paylan SS, Gentes-Hawn A, Hoaken PNS. Alcohol affects executive cognitive functioning differentially on the ascending versus descending limb of the blood alcohol concentration curve. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27(5):773–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giancola PR, Zeichner A. The biphasic effects of alcohol on human physical aggression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(4):598–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schacht RL, Stoner SA, George WH, Norris J. Idiographically determined versus standard absorption periods in alcohol administration studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(5):925–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bird ST, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, Johnson CH. Getting your partner to use condoms: interviews with men and women at risk of HIV/STDs. J Sex Res. 2001;38(3):233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abbey A, Parkhill MR, Koss MP. The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychol Women Q. 2005;29(4):364–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis KC, Gilmore AK, Stappenbeck CA, Balsan MJ, George WH, Norris J. How to score the Sexual Experiences Survey? A comparison of nine methods. Psychol Violence. 2014;4(4):445–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(4):665–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Muthén LK. Mplus users guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  36. West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. p. 209–31.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hayes AF. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  38. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson; 2007. p. 980.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cho Y-H, Span SA. The effect of alcohol on sexual risk-taking among young men and women. Addict Behav. 2010;35(8):779–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Davis KC, Hendershot CS, George WH, Norris J, Heiman JR. Alcohol’s effects on sexual decision making: an integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(6):843–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MacDonald TK, Fong GT, Zanna MP, Martineau AM. Alcohol myopia and condom use: can alcohol intoxication be associated with more prudent behavior? J Personal Soc Psychol. 2000;78(4):605–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Steele CM, Josephs RA. Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. Am Psychol. 1990;45(8):921–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Purdie MP, Norris J, Davis KC, Zawacki T, Morrison DM, George WH, et al. The effects of acute alcohol intoxication, partner risk level, and general intention to have unprotected sex on women’s sexual decision making with a new partner. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;19(5):378–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Frye V, Ompad D, Chan C, Koblin B, Galea S, Vlahov D. Intimate partner violence perpetration and condom use-related factors: associations with heterosexual men’s consistent condom use. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(1):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Peterson ZD, Janssen E, Heiman JR. The association between sexual aggression and HIV risk behavior in heterosexual men. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(3):538–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bandura A. Adolescent development from agentic perspective. In: Pajares F, Urdan TC, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. Self-efficacy, adolescents’ risk-taking behaviors, and health. In: Pajares F, Urdan TC, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Johnson BT. Eroticizing creates safer sex: a research synthesis. J Prim Prev. 2006;27(6):619–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Abbey A, Wegner R, Woerner J, Pegram SE, Pierce J. Review of survey and experimental research that examined the relationship between alcohol consumption and men’s sexual aggression perpetration. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(4):265–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Davis KC, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Stappenbeck CA, Danube CL, Morrison DM, Norris J, George WH. Men's condom use resistance: Alcohol effects on Theory of Planned Behavior constructs. Health Psychol. In press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA017608).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, University of Washington, Box 354900, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Kelly Cue Davis

  2. Institutional Research and Decision Support, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA

    Cinnamon L. Danube

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Elizabeth C. Neilson, William H. George & Kelly F. Kajumulo

  4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Cynthia A. Stappenbeck

  5. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Jeanette Norris

Authors
  1. Kelly Cue Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cinnamon L. Danube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth C. Neilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cynthia A. Stappenbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jeanette Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. William H. George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kelly F. Kajumulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Cue Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, K.C., Danube, C.L., Neilson, E.C. et al. Distal and Proximal Influences on Men’s Intentions to Resist Condoms: Alcohol, Sexual Aggression History, Impulsivity, and Social-Cognitive Factors. AIDS Behav 20 (Suppl 1), 147–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1132-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1132-9

Keywords

  • Condom use resistance
  • Alcohol
  • Sexual aggression
  • Impulsivity