Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Opportunities for Improving Partner Notification for HIV: Results from a Community-Based Participatory Research Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To identify actionable opportunities for improving Partner Notification (PN) for HIV among men who have sex with men (MSM), we characterized the perspectives and experiences of PN among Medical Case Managers (case managers), Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS), and MSM. In partnership with an AIDS service organization and the Connecticut State Health Department, we conducted a focus group of case managers (n = 14) and in-depth interviews with DIS (n = 7) and MSM (n = 24). We found differences between MSM’s and providers’ (case managers and DIS) perspectives regarding (1) determinants of sexual risk behaviors; (2) considerations impacting HIV disclosure; and (3) barriers to trusting relationships between MSM and providers. Factors impacting MSM perspectives on PN were incompletely appreciated by both case managers and DIS. PN may be improved through improving provider understanding of the complexities for MSM regarding sexual risk behaviors and disclosure and transcending barriers to trusting relationships between MSM and providers.

Resumen

Para identificar los posibles oportunidades de mejora de Notificación (PN) de VIH entre los hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH), se caracterizan las perspectivas y experiencias de la NP entre médicos encargados de caso (caso), especialistas en Intervención de Enfermedades (DIS), así como los HSH. En colaboración con una organización de servicios relacionados con el SIDA y el estado de Connecticut Departamento de Salud, se realizó una sesión de grupo de administradores de casos (n = 14) y de entrevistas en profundidad a DIS (n = 7) y HSH (n = 24). Se han encontrado diferencias entre HSH y de los proveedores de los encargados del caso y (DIS) las perspectivas en lo que se refiere a 1) factores determinantes de comportamientos sexuales de alto riesgo; 2) consideraciones que afectan EL VIH divulgación; y 3) las barreras de relaciones de confianza entre HSH y proveedores. Los factores que afectan las perspectivas de HSH PN fueron muy apreciada tanto por los administradores de casos y DIS. PN puede ser mejorado a través de la mejora médica comprensión de las complejidades para los HSH en relación con conductas sexuales de riesgo y la divulgación y trasciende las barreras de relaciones de confianza entre HSH y los proveedores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hogben M, McNally T, McPheeters M, Hutchinson AB. The effectiveness of HIV partner counseling and referral services in increasing identification of HIV-positive individuals a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(2 Suppl):S89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song B, Begley EB, Lesondak L, Voorhees K, Esquivel M, Merrick RL, et al. Partner referral by HIV-infected persons to partner counseling and referral services (PCRS)—results from a demonstration project. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, Lombard C, Guttmacher S, Oxman A, et al. A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13(5):285–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Golden MR, Stekler J, Kent JB, Hughes JP, Wood RW. An evaluation of HIV partner counseling and referral services using new disposition codes. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(2):95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(RR-9):1–83; quiz CE1-4.

  6. Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e17502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(37):1201–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late HIV testing ‐ 34 states, 1996–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(24):661–5.

  9. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(4):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson W, Jenkins H, Roome, A. HIV Sex Partner Notification Services Available. Conn Epidemiol. 2009;29(3):9–10.

  11. Simon Rosser BR, Horvath KJ, Hatfield LA, Peterson JL, Jacoby S, Stately A. Predictors of HIV disclosure to secondary partners and sexual risk behavior among a high-risk sample of HIV-positive MSM: results from six epicenters in the US. AIDS Care. 2008;20(8):925–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mimiaga MJ, Fair AD, Tetu AM, Novak DS, Vanderwarker R, Bertrand T, et al. Acceptability of an internet-based partner notification system for sexually transmitted infection exposure among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1009–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Tetu AM, Bonafide KE, Cranston K, Bertrand T, et al. Partner notification after STD and HIV exposures and infections: knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Massachusetts men who have sex with men. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(1):111–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Tetu AM, Cranston K, Bertrand T, Novak DS, et al. Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of partner notification after HIV and STI exposure and infection among MSM. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):738–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mimiaga MJ, Tetu AM, Gortmaker S, Koenen KC, Fair AD, Novak DS, et al. HIV and STD status among MSM and attitudes about Internet partner notification for STD exposure. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(2):111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Golden MR, Hopkins SG, Morris M, Holmes KK, Handsfield HH. Support among persons infected with HIV for routine health department contact for HIV partner notification. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32(2):196–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogben M, Paffel J, Broussard D, Wolf W, Kenney K, Rubin S, et al. Syphilis partner notification with men who have sex with men: a review and commentary. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(10 Suppl):S43–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patton M. Qualitative research and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Power R. The role of qualitative research in HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 1998;12(7):687–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ activities using community-based participatory research to address healthcare disparities. Rockville; 2009.

  24. Wilson PA, Moore TE. Public health responses to the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men: a qualitative study of US health departments and communities. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):1013–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cole CA, Edelman EJ, Boshnack N, Jenkins H, Richardson W, Rosenthal MS. Time, dual roles, and departments of public health: lessons learned in CBPR by an AIDS service organization. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013;7(3):323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Minkler M. Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. J Urban Health. 2005;82(2 Suppl 2):ii3–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Flicker S, Wilson M, Travers R, Bereket T, McKay C, van der Meulen A, et al. Community-based research in AIDS-service organizations: what helps and what doesn’t? AIDS Care. 2009;21(1):94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cashman SB, Adeky S, Allen AJ 3rd, Corburn J, Israel BA, Montano J, et al. The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1407–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenthal MS, Lucas GI, Tinney B, Mangione C, Schuster MA, Wells K, et al. Teaching community-based participatory research principles to physicians enrolled in a health services research fellowship. Acad Med. 2009;84(4):478–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan DL. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol. 1996;22:129–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995;311(6999):251–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Adamson J, Donovan JL. Research in black and white. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(6):816–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rhodes PJ. Race-of-interviewer effects—a brief comment. Sociology. 1994;28(2):547–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation. 2009;119(19):2633–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Edelman EJ, Cole CA, Boshnack N, Jenkins H, Richardson W, Rosenthal MS. Promoting HIV testing among partners of HIV-positive clients. CES4Health.info; 2013 [cited 2013 3/14/2013]. http://www.ces4health.info/find-products/view-product.aspx?code=C6NX2HTH.

  39. CT-RI Public Health Training Center. HIV partner referral services: program overview and the role of public health professionals [webinar] 2013 [updated 7.09.20137.09.2013]. https://ct.train.org/DesktopModules/eLearning/CourseDetails/CourseDetailsForm.aspx?tabid=96&courseid=1041132&backURL=L0Rlc2t0b3BTaGVsbC5hc3B4P3RhYklkPTk2.

  40. Obermeyer CM, Baijal P, Pegurri E. Facilitating HIV disclosure across diverse settings: a review. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(6):1011–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Passin WF, Kim AS, Hutchinson AB, Crepaz N, Herbst JH, Lyles CM. A systematic review of HIV partner counseling and referral services: client and provider attitudes, preferences, practices, and experiences. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(5):320–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. St Lawrence JS, Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Phillips WR, Armstrong K, Leichliter JS. STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1784–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Elam G, Macdonald N, Hickson FC, Imrie J, Power R, McGarrigle CA, et al. Risky sexual behaviour in context: qualitative results from an investigation into risk factors for seroconversion among gay men who test for HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(6):473–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, Hart T, Greenwood G, Paul J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):939–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Herrick AL, Stall R, Chmiel JS, Guadamuz TE, Penniman T, Shoptaw S, et al. It gets better: resolution of internalized homophobia over time and associations with positive health outcomes among MSM. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(4):1423–30.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Williams JK. Gender role conflict among African American men who have sex with men and women: associations with mental health and sexual risk and disclosure behaviors. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):127–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jeffries WLt, Marks G, Lauby J, Murrill CS, Millett GA. Homophobia is associated with sexual behavior that increases risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV infection among black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(4):1442–53.

  48. Kubler-Ross E. AIDS: The ultimate challenge. New York: Touchstone; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rudy ET, Aynalem G, Cross J, Ramirez F, Bolan RK, Kerndt PR. Community-embedded disease intervention specialist program for syphilis partner notification in a clinic serving men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(9):701–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was generously supported by the Yale School of Medicine, the Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Foundation, and the United States Department of Veteran Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Jennifer Edelman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edelman, E.J., Cole, C.A., Richardson, W. et al. Opportunities for Improving Partner Notification for HIV: Results from a Community-Based Participatory Research Study. AIDS Behav 18, 1888–1897 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0692-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0692-9

Keywords

Navigation