AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 36–40 | Cite as

Unmet HIV Service Needs Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States

  • David R. Holtgrave
  • J. Janet Kim
  • Chris Adkins
  • Cathy Maulsby
  • Kali D. Lindsey
  • Kim M. Johnson
  • Daniel C. Montoya
  • Robin T. Kelley
Brief Report

Abstract

The National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) clearly emphasized the need to provide services to black men who have sex with men (MSM). However, there are no estimates of the unmet HIV-related service delivery needs among black MSM. We estimate that of 195,313 black MSM living with HIV in the US, 50,196 were not yet diagnosed, and 145,118 were aware of their seropositivity (of whom 67,625 were not linked to care and 77,493 were linked to care). Also, of those already diagnosed, ~43,390 had undetectable viral load and 101,728 had detectable viral load. Approximately 19,545 of diagnosed black MSM engage in unprotected risk behavior in serostatus-discordant partnerships. The cost of delivering services needed to meet the NHAS goals is ~$2.475 billion in 2011 U.S. dollars. Mathematical modeling suggests that provisions of these services would avert 6213 HIV infections at an economically favorable cost of $20,032 per quality-adjusted life year saved.

Keywords

HIV Policy analysis Economic evaluation Mathematical modeling Gay men MSM 

References

  1. 1.
    CDC. HIV and AIDS among Gay and Bisexual Men. CDC Fact Sheet 2012;6:1–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men—21 Cities, United States, 2008. MMWR 2010;59(37):1201–1207.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The White House Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States. Washington DC: White House, July 13, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(12 suppl):DS197–DS199.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions: a primer. In: Holtgrave DR, editor. Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. New York: Plenum Press; 1998. p. 34–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holtgrave DR, Wolitski RJ, Pals SL, et al. Cost-utility analysis of the housing and health intervention for homeless and unstably housed persons living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2012;17(5):1626–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holtgrave DR. On the epidemiologic and economic importance of the National AIDS Strategy for the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(2):139–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holtgrave DR, Hall HI, Wehrmeyer L, Maulsby C. Costs, consequences and feasibility of strategies for achieving the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy in the United States: a closing window for success? AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1365–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lieb S, Fallon SJ, Friedman SR, Thompson DR, Gates GJ, Liberti TM, Malow RM. Statewide estimation of racial/ethnic populations of men who have sex with men in the U.S. Public Health Rep. 2011;126:60–72.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Section 1: Population. Tables 3 and 4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Section 1: Population. Table 11.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CDC. Prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection among persons aged ≥13 years—National HIV Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:57–64.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahle GK, Tang T, Shouse L, Mermin J, Hall HI. Using the HIV surveillance system to monitor the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freedman M, Mattson C, Johnson C, et al. Medical Monitoring Project, 2009 to 2010. National representative estimates of sexual risk behaviors among HIV + adults receiving medical care: U.S. 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Seattle, Washington, 2012 (abstract #1090).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berry M, Raymond HF, McFarland W. Same race and older partner selection may explain higher HIV prevalence among black men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2007;21(17):2349–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raymond HF, McFarland W. Racial mixing and HIV risk among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):630–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tieu HV, Murrill C, Xu G, Koblin BA. Sexual partnering and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men: New York City. J Urban Health. 2010;87:113–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen RS. Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1447–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall HI, Holtgrave DR, Tang T, Rhodes P. HIV transmission in the United States: Considerations of viral load, risk behavior, and health disparities. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1632–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanchez T, Kelley C, O’Hara B, et al. Lack of awareness of HIV infection: problems and solutions with self-reported HIV serostatus of men who have sex with men (MSM): AIDS 2012, XIX International AIDS Conference. Washington, July 22–27, 2012 (poster abstract MOPE290).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CDC. Establishing a holistic framework to reduce inequities in HIV, viral hepatitis, STDs, and tuberculosis in the United States: An NCHHSTP white paper on social determinants of health. 2010. Online document available at http://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/docs/SDH-White-Paper-2010.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Holtgrave
    • 1
  • J. Janet Kim
    • 1
  • Chris Adkins
    • 1
  • Cathy Maulsby
    • 1
  • Kali D. Lindsey
    • 2
  • Kim M. Johnson
    • 3
  • Daniel C. Montoya
    • 2
  • Robin T. Kelley
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health, Behavior and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.National Minority AIDS CouncilWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Division of Community Advancement and Leadership StrategiesNational Minority AIDS CouncilWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations