Skip to main content

Charges for Criminal Exposure to HIV and Aggravated Prostitution Filed in the Nashville, Tennessee Prosecutorial Region 2000–2010

Abstract

This paper examines comprehensive data on arrests for HIV-specific crimes within a single jurisdiction, the Nashville Tennessee prosecutorial region, over 11 years. There were 25 arrests for HIV exposure and 27 for aggravated prostitution. Eleven of the arrests for HIV exposure involved nonsexual behaviors; none alleged transmission. Sixteen of the arrests for HIV exposure involved sexual behavior; three alleged transmission. Aggravated prostitution cases (i.e. prostitution while knowing one has HIV) often involved solicitation of oral sex; none alleged transmission. Maximum sentences for HIV-specific crimes ranged from 5 to 8 years. We conclude that enforcement of US HIV-specific laws is underestimated. Fifty-two arrests over 11 years were recorded in one jurisdiction. Over half of the arrests involved behaviors posing minimal or no HIV transmission risk. Despite concerns about malicious, intentional HIV transmission, no cases alleged malice or intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Criminal exposure of another to HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or to hepatitis C virus (HCV). 2012; Tenn. Code Ann. §39-13-109.

  2. 2.

    Aggravated prostitution. 2012; Tenn. Code Ann. §39-13-516.

  3. 3.

    Lazzarini Z, Bray S, Burris S. Evaluating the impact of criminal laws on HIV risk behavior. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):239–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bennet-Carlson R, Faria D, Hanssens C. Ending and defending against HIV criminalization: a manual for advocates Vol 1, 1st ed. State and Federal Laws and Prosecutions; 2011. www.hivlawandpolicy.org/resources/download/564. Accessed 24 Oct 12.

  5. 5.

    Authorized terms of imprisonment and fines for felonies and misdemeanors. 2012; Tenn. Code Ann. §40-35-111.

  6. 6.

    Prostitution. 2012; Tenn. Code Ann. §39-13-513.

  7. 7.

    Tennessee sexual offender and violent sexual offender registration. verification, and tracking act of 2004. 2012; Tenn. Code Ann. §40-39-201-215.

  8. 8.

    National Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS Directors. Understanding State Departments of Health and Corrections Collaboration: a summary of survey findings –Part II and strategic guidance towards ending criminalization-related stigma and discrimination; 2011. www.nastad.org/HIVC/decriminalization_findings.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 12.

  9. 9.

    UNAIDS. Brief policy: criminalization of HIV transmission. 2008. http://www.data.unaids.org/.../20080731_jc1513_policy_criminalization_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 12.

  10. 10.

    Burris S, Cameron E. The case against criminalization of HIV transmission. JAMA. 2008;300(5):578–81.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD. Conflicting messages: how criminal HIV disclosure laws undermine public health efforts to control the spread of HIV. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):451–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, MacQueen K, Buchbinder SP. Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(3):306–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily M. Systematic review of orogenital HIV-1 transmission probabilities. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:1255–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Friedman H. To protect and serve? Trial. 2011;47:14–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dodds C, Bourne A, Weait M. Responses to criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission among gay men with HIV in England and Wales. Reprod Health Matters. 2009;17(34):135–45.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dodds C, Keogh P. Criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission: people living with HIV respond. Int J STD AIDS. 2006;17:315–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Galletly CL, Dickson-Gomez JB. HIV sero-positive status disclosure to prospective sex partners and criminal laws that require it: perspectives of persons living with HIV. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(9):613–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Galletly CL, DiFranceisco W, Pinkerton SD. HIV-positive persons’ awareness and understanding of their states’ criminal HIV disclosure law. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:1262–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Horvath KJ, Weinmeyer R, Rosser S. Should it be illegal for HIV-positive persons to have unprotected sex without disclosure? An examination of attitudes among US men who have sex with men and the impact of state law. AIDS Care. 2010;22:1221–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    U.S. positive women’s network. diagnosis, sexuality, and choice: women living with hiv and the quest for equality, dignity and quality of life in the U.S. Oakland California; 2011. http://www.pwn-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/PWN-HR-Survey-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 12.

  21. 21.

    Klitzman R, Kirshenbaum S, Kittel L, et al. Naming names: perceptions of name-based reporting, partner notification, and the criminalization of nondisclosure among persons living with HIV. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2004;1(3):38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD, DiFrancesico W. A quantitative study of Michigan’s criminal HIV exposure law. AIDS Care. 2011;24(2):174–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Burris S, Beletsky L, Burleson J, Case P, Lazzarini Z. Do criminal laws influence HIV risk behavior? An empirical trial. Arizona State Law J. 2007;39:467–519.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    O’Byrne P, Bryan A, Woodyatt C. Nondisclosure prosecutions and HIV prevention: results from an Ottawa-based gay men’s sex survey. J Assoc Nurses in AIDS Care. 2012;[ahead of publication].

  25. 25.

    Adam BD, Elliott R, Husbands W, Murray J, Maxwell J. Effects of the criminalization of HIV transmission in Cuerrier on men reporting unprotected sex with men. Can J Law and Soc. 2008;23:143–59.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Galletly CL, Glasman LR, Pinkerton SD, DiFranceisco W. New Jersey’s HIV exposure law and the HIV-related attitudes, beliefs, and sexual and seropositive status disclosure behaviors of persons living with HIV. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):2135–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mykhalovskiy E. The problem of “significant risk”: exploring the public health impact of criminalizing HIV non-disclosure. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:668–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hoppe T. Punishing HIV: how michigan trial courts frame felony HIV disclosure cases. Presentation at International AIDS Conference 2012, Washington, DC; 25 Jun 2012.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol L. Galletly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galletly, C.L., Lazzarini, Z. Charges for Criminal Exposure to HIV and Aggravated Prostitution Filed in the Nashville, Tennessee Prosecutorial Region 2000–2010. AIDS Behav 17, 2624–2636 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0408-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • HIV-specific criminal statutes
  • HIV exposure laws
  • Persons living with HIV
  • Criminal law
  • HIV seropositive status disclosure
  • HIV transmission prevention